Table 7.

Comparison results of overlap scores on LIDC dataset in the state-of-the-art methods.

Method	Overlap scores
Kostis et al. (2003) [3]	0.57 ± 0.20
Okada et al. (2005) [23]	0.45 ± 0.21
Kuhnigk et al. (2006) [20]	0.56 ± 0.18
Kubota et al. (2011) [14]	0.66 ± 0.18
Messay et al. (2015) [52]	0.77 ± 0.09
Ye et al. (2019) [33]	0.81 ± 0.13
Wang et al. (2021) [34]	0.84 ± 0.10
Our method	0.86 ± 0.08