Table 2.
Comparison between this study and other studies.
| No. | Process | Removal | Process conditions | References |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Microfiltration and visible-light-driven photocatalysison g-C3N4nanosheet/reduced graphene oxide membrane | TOC = 21 %, Turbidity = 84% by memberance TOC= 42%, Turbidity = 90% by integrated process | Time = 1 h. For the g-C3N4NS/RGO/CA (100 gm in 200 mL) membrane under visible light irradiation, the stable permeation flux = 140 L m−2h−1, pH = 7.1. | 50 |
| 2 | Solar photocatalysis using TiO2/ZnO/H2O2 to pretreat reverse osmosis (membrane fouling) | TOC = 76.5% | Reaction time = 179 min, TiO2 =,0.51 g/L, ZnO = 0.46 g/L, pH= 6.9 and H2O2 = 0.89 mL/L | 51 |
| 3 | Photocatalytic by bi-polymer electrospun nanofibers embedding Ag3PO4/P25 composite | TOC = 86 %, turbidity = 50% | Reaction time = 150 min, flow rate (5 mL/h), pH = 7 | 52 |
| 4 | photocatalysis, Fenton-based processes and ozonation | TOC < 20%, TOC = 74% by ozonation combined with H2O2 | Reaction time = 4 h, H2O2/Fe = 0.5O3= 4 g h−1 , H2O2 = 1500 mg L−1 , pH =10, reaction time = 2 h , temperature= 20 °C | 53 |
| 5 | hybrid ultrafiltration/ reverse osmosis (UF/RO) systeme | TOC = 98% | TMP = 3 bar, CFV =1 m/s, temperature = 40 °C, and pH = 9 | 54 |
| 6 | Solar photocatalysis reactor by UV, UV/H2O2, and UV/TiO2 and ultrafiltration membrane fouling | By UV TOC = 20%, Turbidity = 40% by UV/H2O2 TOC= 30%, Turbidity= 95% by UV/TiO2 TOC = 50%, Turbidity = 87.8% by | Reaction time of 6 hr., solar radiation of 14.8–18.4 w/m2.hr, pH = 7.0, H2O2 = 15 mg/L, and flow rate = 50 mL/min | This study |