Skip to main content
. 2022 Oct 6;12:16764. doi: 10.1038/s41598-022-20779-3

Table 2.

Log-dose probit estimated data of imidacloprid, profenofos and thiodicarb against field populations of Phenacoccus solenopsis.

Insecticide Population n Slope ± SE χ2 (df) P LC50 (mg L−1) FL 95% RR LC99 (mg L−1) FL 95%
Imidacloprid Junagadh 210 0.804 ± 0.125 3.284 (5) 0.511 16.89 8.996–30.269 5.78 224.42 126.95–596.10
Ludhiana 210 0.462 ± 0.114 0.553 (5) 0.968 4.87 0.816–12.855 1.67 127.61 63.01–416.26
Saoner 203 0.798 ± 0.126 6.445 (5) 0.168 25.68 7.475–90.063 8.79 348.76 157.65–868.36
Chhindwara 210 0.811 ± 0.126 4.468 (5) 0.346 23.34 4.289–117.15 7.99 408.35 207.42–946.48
Lab population 232 0.792 ± 0.194 0.922 (5) 0.038 2.92 2.333–3.672 1.00 56.132 31.24–139.05
Profenofos Junagadh 220 0.747 ± 0.129 5.009 (5) 0.287 82.23 33.057–65.14 55.94 506.10 278.51–974.16
Ludhiana 232 0.785 ± 0.124 0.782 (5) 0.941 27.74 5.519–55.21 18.87 405.22 221.43–737.91
Saoner 210 0.769 ± 0.128 0.429 (5) 0.980 88.00 24.730–20.57 59.86 525.60 267.76–805.05
Chhindwara 240 0.693 ± 0.122 1.978 (5) 0.740 54.76 22.842–12.61 37.25 694.79 219.78–869. 26
Lab population 240 1.294 ± 0.275 0.392 (5) 0.096 1.47 1.011–2.091 1.00 24.92 10.55–51.65
Thiodicarb Junagadh 210 1.304 ± 0.163 2.131 (5) 0.712 16.75 11.041–5.116 6.36 616.25 242.12–1155.30
Ludhiana 222 0.785 ± 0.124 0.280 (5) 0.991 52.88 39.92–110.46 20.07 421.79 205.22–817.72
Saoner 242 0.619 ± 0.119 2.861 (5) 0.582 5.643 1.832–11.926 2.14 89.57 49.35–241.59
Chhindwara 210 0.699 ± 0.121 2.946 (5) 0.567 35.38 18.341–53.874 13.43 558.85 259.91–802.63
Lab population 232 0.676 ± 0.221 1.467 (5) 0.367 2.635 2.038–3.371 1.00 44.412 35.56–158.46

n, number of insects tested; SE, Standard Error; χ2, chi-square testing goodness of fit of concentration-mortality response; df, Degrees of freedom; LC in mg L−1, Lethal Concentration; FL, Fiducial Limits; Relative Resistance (RR) = LC50 of field collected test population/LC50 of Laboratory Susceptible check.