Table 2.

Hazard ratios (HRs) for the association between SUA and the risk of CRC.

Group	Cases/person-years	Crude models		Adjusted models
		HR (95%CI)	p-value	HR (95%CI)	p-value
Traditional Cox models
T1 group	164/385,559	Ref		Ref
T2 group	188/383,406	1.47 (1.02, 2.01)	0.044	1.13 (0.92, 1.67)	0.435
T3 group	231/373,106	2.30 (1.53, 3.40)	< 0.001	1.55 (1.09, 2.30)	0.019
P for trend			< 0.001		0.004
SD models
T1 group	164/385,559	Ref		Ref
T2 group	188/383,406	1.44 (0.99, 2.01)	0.057	1.07 (0.87, 1.56)	0.510
T3 group	231/373,106	2.29 (1.52, 3.40)	< 0.001	1.50 (1.05, 2.25)	0.029
P for trend			< 0.001		0.005
CS models
T1 group	164/385,559	Ref		Ref
T2 group	188/383,406	1.47 (1.02, 2.01)	0.045	1.13 (0.91, 1.67)	0.460
T3 group	231/373,106	2.29 (1.53, 3.39)	< 0.001	1.55 (1.09, 2.30)	0.020
P for trend			< 0.001		0.005

Models were adjusted for age (every 10 years), sex, family income, educational background, marital status, BMI, TG, TC, TBIL, ALT, CRP, smoking status, drinking status, physical activity, sedentary lifestyle, tea consumption, high-fat diet, diabetes, hypertension, chronic kidney disease, and family history of cancer.

SD models: the sub-distribution hazard function models.

CS models: the cause-specific hazards models.