Table 5.
Diagnostic criteriaa.
| References | Diagnostic criteria | Global functioning | Subjective cognitive complaints | Cognitive decline | Objective cognitive impairment | Normal functional abilities | Absence of dementia | Normal mental status |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Afgin et al. (29) | Morris (30) | CDR = 0.5 | ||||||
| Alkhunizan et al. (31) | Trzepacz (32) | MoCA < 26 | ||||||
| Amer et al. (33) | MoCA < 26 | MoCA < 26 | ||||||
| Anstey et al. (34) | Petersen (7) | – | – | – | – | – | – | – |
| Busse et al. (35) | Petersen (7) | √ | √ | √ | √ | |||
| Busse et al. (35) | aMCI-modified: no criterion regarding subjective cognitive complaints | √ | √ | √ | ||||
| Busse et al. (36) | Petersen (7) | √ | √ | √ | √ | |||
| Busse et al. (36) | aMCI-modified: no criterion regarding subjective cognitive complaints | √ | √ | √ | ||||
| Chuang et al. (37) | Albert (1) | √ | √ | √ | √ | |||
| Clark et al. (38) | Jak (13) Criterion 1: At least one test blow the cut-off Criterion 2: At least two tests below the cut-off for one cognitive domain | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| Dimitrov et al. (39) | Petersen's criteria modified by Portet (40) | √ | √ | √ | √ | √ | ||
| Ding et al. (41) | Petersen (3) | √ | √ | √ | √ | |||
| Dlugaj et al. (42) | MCI- original criteria (3, 45) | √ | √ | √ | √ | |||
| Dlugaj et al. (42) | MCI- modified criteria: no criterion regarding subjective cognitive complaints | √ | √ | √ | ||||
| Fernández - Blázquez et al. (43) | Albert (1) | CDR = 0.5 | ||||||
| Ganguli et al. (44) | Criterion 1 | CDR = 0.5 | ||||||
| Ganguli et al. (44) | Criterion 2: Ad hoc | |||||||
| Ganguli et al. (44) | Criterion 3: Petersen (3) | √ | √ | √ | √ | MMSE ≥ 21 | ||
| Ganguli et al. (44) | Criterion 4: Winblad (45) | √ | √ | √ | √ | MMSE ≥ 21 | ||
| Gavrila et al. (46) | Caracciolo (47) | √ | √ | MMSE ≥ 1DS | ||||
| GjØra et al. (48) | DSM-5 | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| González et al. (49) | Albert (1) | √ | √ | √ | √ | |||
| Han et al. (50) | Petersen (3) | √ | √ | √ | ||||
| Hanninen et al. (51) | Petersen (7) | CDR = 0.5 | √ | √ | √ | √ | √ | |
| Jia et al. (17) | Petersen (3) Winblad (45) | CDR = 0.5 | √ | √ | √ | |||
| Juarez-Cedillo et al. (102) | Petersen (95) | √ | √ | √ | √ | MMSE > 23 | ||
| Juncos-Rabadan et al. (52) | Petersen (3) | – | – | – | – | – | – | – |
| Katz et al. (53) | Artero (54) | √ | √ | √ | √ | |||
| Khedr et al. (55) | – | CDR = 0.5 | √ | √ | √ | |||
| Kim et al. (56) | Petersen (3) | – | – | – | – | – | – | – |
| Kochan et al. (57) | Petersen (3) | – | – | – | – | – | – | – |
| Kumar et al. (58) | Petersen (7) | – | – | – | – | – | – | – |
| Lara et al. (59) | Albert (1) | √ | √ | √ | √ | |||
| Lee et al. (60) | Petersen (3) | √ | √ | √ | MMSE >1.5 DS | |||
| Li et al. (61) | Petersen (3) | √ | √ | √ | √ | MMSE > 23 | ||
| Limongi et al. (62) | Dlugaj (42) | √ | √ | √ | MMSE > 23.8 | |||
| Lindgren et al. (63) | Knopman (64) | TICS-m = 28–31 | ||||||
| Liu et al. (65) | Albert (1) | √ | √ | √ | ||||
| Liu et al. (66) | Albert (1) | √ | √ | √ | √ | |||
| Lopez et al. (67) | – | √ | √ | √ | √ | |||
| Lopez-Anton et al. (68) | Petersen (7) | √ | √ | √ | √ | √ | √ | |
| Lopez-Anton et al. (68) | DSM-5 | √ | √ | √ | √ | |||
| Luck et al. (69) | Original criteria (45) | √ | √ | √ | √ | √ | ||
| Luck et al. (69) | Modified criteria: no criterion regarding subjective cognitive complaints | √ | √ | √ | √ | |||
| Ma et al. (70) | Petersen (3) | √ | √ | √ | √ | √ | ||
| Meguro et al. (71) | Petersen (7) | √ | √ | √ | √ | √ | ||
| Mohan et al. (72) | Portet (40) | √ | √ | √ | √ | √ | ||
| Mooi and Hamid (73) | Shahar (74) | MMSE ≤ 21 | ||||||
| Moretti et al. (75) | Winblad (45) Definition A: no criterion regarding subjective cognitive complaints | – | – | – | – | – | – | – |
| Moretti et al. (75) | Winblad (45) Definition B: original criteria | – | – | – | – | – | – | – |
| Noguchi-Shinohara et al. (76) | Winblad (45) | √ | √ | √ | √ | |||
| Ogunniyi et al. (77) | Petersen (9) | – | – | – | – | – | – | – |
| Paddick et al. (78) | Winblad (45) | – | – | – | – | – | – | – |
| Parlevliet et al. (79) | Krabbe (80) | √ | √ | √ | ||||
| Peltz et al. (81) | Petersen (82) | √ | √ | MMSE ≥ 24 | ||||
| Petersen et al. (83) | Petersen (3) | √ | √ | √ | √ | |||
| Radford et al. (84) | Winblad (45) | – | – | – | – | – | – | – |
| Rao et al. (85) | Petersen (3) | √ | √ | √ | √ | |||
| Rentería et al. (86) | Jak (13) | √ | ||||||
| Robertson et al. (27) | Trittschuh (87) | – | – | – | – | – | – | – |
| Ruan et al. (88) | – | RCS = 6–7 | ||||||
| Sasaki et al. (89) | – | √ | √ | √ | √ | |||
| Shahnawaz et al. (90) | Winblad (45) | √ | √ | √ | √ | |||
| Shimada et al. (19) | Jungwirth (91) | √ | √ | √ | √ | |||
| Sosa et al. (28) | Petersen (9) | √ | √ | √ | √ | |||
| Su et al. (92) | Petersen (3) | √ | √ | √ | √ | √ | ||
| Teh et al. (26) | Winblad (9) | √ | √ | √ | √ | |||
| Tognoni et al. (93) | Petersen (7) | √ | √ | √ | √ | √ | √ | |
| Tsolaki et al. (94) | Method 1: Ad hoc Method 2: Same criteria as method 1 but MMSE score is adjusted for age and schooling Method 3: Petersen (95) Method 4: Same criteria as method 1 but MMSE score is adjusted for age and schooling | MMSE/HINDI score | √ | |||||
| Tsoy et al. (96) | Winblad (45) | √ | √ | √ | √ | |||
| Vlachos et al. (97) | Petersen (3) | √ | √ | √ | ||||
| Welstead et al. (98) | Albert (1) | √ | √ | √ | √ | MMSE ≥ 24 | ||
| Wu et al. (99) | – | MMSE score | ||||||
| Xu et al. (100) | Petersen (7) | √ | √ | √ | √ | √ | ||
| Yang et al. (101) | Petersen (3) | CDR ≤ 0.5 MoCA ≤ 23 |
√ | √ | √ |
a
The abbreviations that are present in this table are reported in the Appendix.