TABLE 2.
Sampling method | Collection mechanism a | Collection media | Flow rate range | Captured particle range (d50, μm) | Advantages | Disadvantages | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Passive air sampling | Sedimentation | A petri dish is opened and exposed to the air for specified periods of time to determine what microbiological particles may be present in the environment, as they may settle out of the ambient air and on the media surface of the petri dish | Filter | NA | Depending on the filter porosity | Not aggressive. Lower cost | Qualitative analysis. Collection duration is longer |
Active air sampling | Impactor | Particles in the incoming airstream accelerate through small nozzles (in the form of holes or slits), and those with high inertia impact on the surface of collection media | Agar, slide or filter | ~1–125 L/min | <1 (single‐stage) or 0.01–10 (multi‐stage) | Collect viruses in different particle sizes. More efficient for larger particles | Wall loss. Virus deactivation upon collection. Low‐efficiency for small virus particles |
Cyclone | Centrifugal forces deviate particles from the airflow to impact on the collection wall | Dry vial | ~10–400 L/min | >0.5 | Collect viruses in different particle sizes. More efficient for larger particles | Wall loss. Virus deactivation upon collection. Low‐efficiency for small virus particles. | |
Filter | Particles are collected on the filter media through interception, inertial impaction, and diffusion | Filter or membrane media | ~1–1000 L/min (filter dependent) | Dependent on filter porosity (<1) | Efficient for particles from 20 nm to 10 μm or even larger. Easy to use | Inactivation of viruses due to dehydration or extraction from filters | |
Impinger | Abrupt change in the airstream direction inside the bottle impacts particles into the liquid collection medium | Liquid | ~10–500 L/min | >1 | Maintain viability of viruses. No need to extract viruses from a surface or filter | Wall loss or inlet loss. Low efficiency for small virus particles | |
Water‐based condensation | A laminar‐flow condensation growth tube (CGT) encapsulates airborne particles into liquid droplets and gently deposits the droplets on a liquid surface | Liquid | ~10–1000 L/min | <0.5 | Maintain viability of viruses. Efficient for particles from 8 nm to 10 μm or even larger | Bulky and complex to operate |
Abbreviation: NA, not applicable.
Adapted from Pan et al. 6