Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2022 Oct 7.
Published in final edited form as: Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2022 Apr 30;194(1):79–89. doi: 10.1007/s10549-022-06607-2

Table 2.

Magnetic resonance elastography (MRE) parameters and Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) background parenchymal enhancement (BPE) by risk status and breast density

Characteristic Average risk
High risk
Non-dense (N = 16) Dense (N = 34) p-valuea Non-dense (N = 31) Dense (N = 55) p-valuea

Breast stiffness 0.14 0.09
 Mean (SD) 1.07 (0.18) 1.16 (0.21) 1.69 (1.19) 2.14 (1.12)
 Median (range) 1.05 (0.65–1.44) 1.15 (0.76–1.67) 1.09 (0.54–4.36) 1.37 (0.92–4.09)
Breast elasticity 0.01 0.06
 Mean (SD) 0.96 (0.15) 1.10 (0.20) 1.57 (1.08) 2.03 (1.08)
 Median (range) 0.96 (0.61–1.21) 1.10 (0.74–1.58) 1.03 (0.52–3.85) 1.32 (0.74–3.99)
Breast viscosity 0.78 0.13
 Mean (SD) 0.23 (0.09) 0.23 (0.07) 0.26 (0.27) 0.35 (0.24)
 Median (range) 0.23 (0.08–0.39) 0.23 (0.11–0.44) 0.20 (0.0–1.39) 0.27 (−0.05–1.05)
BPE (#, % minimal or mild) 14 (87.5%) 20 (58.8%) 0.06 28 (90.3%) 35 (63.6%) 0.01

Breast stiffness, elasticity, and viscosity were averaged across the left and right breasts

a

For breast stiffness, elasticity, and viscosity, the p-value was based on a two-sample t-test allowing for unequal variances. For BPE, the p-value was based on Fisher’s exact test