Skip to main content
. 2022 Aug 29;6(10):711–722. doi: 10.1002/jgh3.12812

Table 3.

Risk of bias assessment

Study Representativeness of the exposed cohort Selection of the non‐exposed cohort Ascertainment of exposure Demonstration that outcome of interest was not present at start of study Comparability of cohorts based on the design or analysis controlled for confounders Assessment of outcome Was follow‐up long enough for outcomes to occur? Adequacy of follow‐up of cohorts
Ghoshal et al. (2020) * * * * ** * *
Kang et al. (2020) * * * * * * *
De Moura et al. (2020) * * * * * * *
Ramachandran et al. (2020) * * * * * *
Zhang et al. (2020) * * * * * *
Cao et al. (2020) * * * * * *
Lin et al. (2020) * * * * *
Jin et al. (2020) * * * * ** * *
Wan et al. (2020) * * * * * *
Wei et al. (2020) * * * * *
Han et al. (2020) * * * ** * * *
Pan et al. (2020) * * * * * * *
Grover et al. (2021) * * * ** * *
Zheng et al. (2020) * * * * * * *
Zhou et al. (2020) * * * * * * *
Xiong et al. (2021) * * * * *
Gonzalez Jimenez et al. (2020) * * * * *
Redd et al. (2020) * * * * * *
Schettino et al. (2021) * * * * * * *
Hajifathalian et al. (2020) * * * * * *
Bishehsari et al. (2022) * * * * * *
Delavari et al. (2022) * * * ** * * *
Fallouh et al. (2022) * * * * * *
Patel et al. (2022) * * * * *

* = 1 point.

** = 2 points.