Are the aims clear? |
4.2 |
Does it achieve its aims? |
4 |
Is it relevant? |
4.5 |
Is it clear what sources of information were used to compile the publication |
4 |
Is it clear when the information used or reported in the publication was produced? |
3.5 |
Is it balanced and unbiased? |
4.5 |
Does it provide details of additional sources of support and information? |
3.5 |
Does it refer to areas of uncertainty? |
3 |
Does it describe how each treatment works? |
3.5 |
Does it describe the benefits of each treatment? |
3.5 |
Does it describe the risks of each treatment? |
2.5 |
Does it describe what would happen if no treatment is used? |
3 |
Does it describe how the treatment choices affect overall quality of life? |
3.5 |
Is it clear that there may be more than one possible treatment choice? |
3 |
Does it provide support for shared decision‐making? |
3.5 |
Based on the answers to all of the above questions, rate the overall quality of the publication as a source of information about treatment choices |
3.5 |