Skip to main content
. 2022 Sep 17;9(10):1626–1642. doi: 10.1002/acn3.51662

Table 2.

MRI outcomes for lesion component/segment‐level analyses.

Bexarotene Placebo Bexarotene‐placebo change
Lesion number Unadjusted mean (SD) change in component/segment lesional MTR (pu) Lesion number Unadjusted mean (SD) change in component/segment lesional MTR (pu) Adjusted bexarotene‐placebo difference (95% CI) p‐value
Lesion components (defined spatially)
Core (innermost) pure WM lesions 695 −0.04 (2.17) 414 −0.09 (1.71) 0.07 (−0.42, 0.56) 0.773
Rim pure WM lesions 1003 0.01 (1.79) 610 0 (1.48) 0.11 (−0.38, 0.59) 0.665
Cuff 1 pure WM lesions 997 −0.02 (1.6) 608 −0.06 (1.33) 0.14 (−0.34, 0.63) 0.566
Cuff 2 pure WM lesions 1002 −0.04 (1.5) 610 −0.07 (1.27) 0.13 (−0.36, 0.61) 0.613
Cuff 3 (outermost) pure WM lesions 1002 −0.02 (1.45) 610 −0.06 (1.22) 0.13 (−0.36, 0.61) 0.602
Interaction test comparing treatment group differences between the components 0.807
Core (innermost) pure CGM lesions 20 0.27 (4.58) 14 0.16 (2.82) 0.01 (−1.41, 1.43) 0.993
Rim pure CGM lesions 46 1.12 (2.69) 39 −0.23 (3.19) 1.27 (0.05, 2.48) 0.053
Cuff 1 pure CGM lesions 46 0.77 (2.37) 39 −0.69 (2.38) 1.37 (0.15, 2.58) 0.038
Cuff 2 pure CGM lesions 46 0.83 (2.51) 39 −0.25 (1.91) 0.98 (−0.23, 2.20) 0.127
Cuff 3 (outermost) pure CGM lesions 46 0.63 (2.55) 39 0 (1.72) 0.57 (−0.65, 1.78) 0.369
Interaction test comparing treatment group differences between the components 0.042
Core (innermost) pure DGM lesions 5 −0.64 (1.65) 6 −1.93 (1.82) 2.09 (0.20, 3.99) 0.063
Rim pure DGM lesions 7 0.47 (2.82) 9 −1.63 (1.42) 2.37 (0.63, 4.10) 0.029
Cuff 1 pure DGM lesions 7 0.28 (0.18) 9 −1.5 (1.44) 2.49 (0.74, 4.23) 0.023
Cuff 2 pure DGM lesions 7 0.18 (2.15) 9 −0.88 (1.95) 1.92 (0.17, 3.68) 0.064
Cuff 3 (outermost) pure DGM lesions 7 0.14 (2.06) 9 −0.65 (1.87) 1.63 (−0.13, 3.38) 0.107
Interaction test comparing treatment group differences between the components 0.732
Lesion segments (defined by the baseline MTR of each voxel)
Quartile 1 (MTR‐defined) segment of pure WM lesions 121 0.99 (2.65) 69 0.52 (1.7) 0.62 (−0.06, 1.31) 0.080
Quartile 2 (MTR‐defined) segment of pure WM lesions 287 0.46 (2.55) 163 0.26 (1.74) 0.23 (−0.37, 0.83) 0.462
Quartile 3 (MTR‐defined) segment of pure WM lesions 431 0.09 (2.13) 265 0.10 (1.72) 0.08 (−0.49, 0.66) 0.776
Quartile 4 (MTR‐defined) segment of pure WM lesions 503 −0.43 (1.93) 306 −0.45 (1.74) 0.14 (−0.42, 0.71) 0.622
Interaction test comparing treatment group differences between the segments 0.157
Quartile 1 (MTR‐defined) segment of pure CGM lesions 32 1.61 (3.56) 29 1.39 (3.21) 0.98 (−0.63, 2.58) 0.245
Quartile 2 (MTR‐defined) segment of pure CGM lesions 40 1.27 (3.18) 32 −0.07 (2.64) 1.51 (−0.04, 3.06) 0.070
Quartile 3 (MTR‐defined) segment of pure CGM lesions 42 0.44 (2.60) 35 −0.69 (3.01) 1.40 (−0.13, 2.93) 0.086
Quartile 4 (MTR‐defined) segment of pure CGM lesions 33 −0.26 (2.81) 27 −1.29 (3.40) 1.02 (−0.59, 2.62) 0.227
Interaction test comparing treatment group differences between the segments 0.791
Quartile 1 (MTR‐defined) segment of pure DGM lesions 5 1.83 (2.26) 8 −0.96 (2.07) 2.66 (0.60, 4.72) 0.050
Quartile 2 (MTR‐defined) segment of pure DGM lesions 6 0.22 (1.99) 8 −1.15 (1.83) 2.09 (−0.01, 4.18) 0.087
Quartile 3 (MTR‐defined) segment of pure DGM lesions 6 −0.60 (1.60) 8 −1.40 (1.29) 1.49 (−0.61, 3.59) 0.202
Quartile 4 (MTR‐defined) segment of pure DGM lesions 5 −1.19 (1.91) 7 −2.00 (1.76) 2.24 (0.12, 4.37) 0.072
Interaction test comparing treatment group differences between the segments 0.489
Lesion segments (defined by the baseline T1 value of each voxel)
Quartile 1 (T1‐defined) segment of pure WM lesions 108 −0.51 (2.32) 79 −0.32 (1.59) 0.27 (−0.56, 1.11) 0.525
Quartile 2 (T1‐defined) segment of pure WM lesions 197 0.08 (2.04) 191 0 (1.72) 0.09 (−0.62, 0.79) 0.806
Quartile 3 (T1‐defined) segment of pure WM lesions 316 0.04 (2.29) 121 −0.05 (1.31) −0.02 (−0.69, 0.65) 0.957
Quartile 4 (T1‐defined) segment of pure WM lesions 261 0.08 (2.08) 135 −0.11 (2.13) 0.35 (−0.32, 1.02) 0.309
Interaction test comparing treatment group differences between the segments 0.447
Quartile 1 (T1‐defined) segment of pure CGM lesions 20 0.56 (4.49) 17 0.46 (2.51) 0.57 (−1.64, 2.79) 0.616
Quartile 2 (T1‐defined) segment of pure CGM lesions 31 0.09 (2.83) 23 0.21 (3.63) 1.29 (−0.78, 3.36) 0.234
Quartile 3 (T1‐defined) segment of pure CGM lesions 36 0.19 (2.72) 28 −0.91 (3.83) 1.66 (−0.35, 3.66) 0.121
Quartile 4 (T1‐defined) segment of pure CGM lesions 26 0.17 (2.54) 24 −0.25 (3.51) 2.01 (−0.07, 4.08) 0.072
Interaction test comparing treatment group differences between the segments 0.544
Quartile 1 (T1‐defined) segment of pure DGM lesions 2 −0.41 (4.01) 4 −2.71 (1.3) 2.90 (−0.23, 6.03) 0.107
Quartile 2 (T1‐defined) segment of pure DGM lesions 4 1 (3.5) 7 −0.99 (1.7) 2.17 (−0.49, 4.84) 0.149
Quartile 3 (T1‐defined) segment of pure DGM lesions 5 0.34 (2.04) 4 0.29 (2.23) 1.19 (−1.62, 4.00) 0.430
Quartile 4 (T1‐defined) segment of pure DGM lesions 3 0.16 (2.42) 2 −1.04 (2.02) 3.00 (−0.50, 6.51) 0.131
Interaction test comparing treatment group differences between the segments 0.545

p values and 95% CIs are for the differences between bexarotene and placebo after adjustment (for the baseline value of that measure and the four binary minimisation factors). MTR, magnetisation transfer ratio; NA, not applicable.