Skip to main content
. 2022 Sep 23;13:938891. doi: 10.3389/fendo.2022.938891

Table 6.

The results of reverse MR.

Methods nSNPs Betas (95% CI) p-value
Urate–BMI IVW 25 −0.022 (−0.054, 0.0092) 0.16
MR-Egger 25
Slope −0.031 (−0.085, 0.022) 0.26
Intercept 0.00097 0.68
Urate–TC IVW 33 0.031 (−0.038, 0.10) 0.38
MR-Egger 33
Slope 0.070 (−0.040, 0.18) 0.22
Intercept −0.0045 0.38
Urate–TG IVW 28 0.071 (−0.039, 0.18) 0.21
MR-Egger 28
Slope −0.0069 (−0.18, 0.16) 0.94
Intercept 0.0010 0.26
Urate–HDL IVW 28 −0.026 (−0.062, 0.010) 0.16
MR-Egger 28
Slope 0.014 (−0.041, 0.068) 0.63
Intercept −0.0051 0.074
Urate–LDL IVW 28 −0.0040 (−0.047, 0.039) 0.86
MR-Egger 28
Slope 0.030 (−0.037, 0.097) 0.38
Intercept −0.0044 0.20

The Bonferroni method was used to correct the significance level of the causal association between exposures and serum urate, with p<0.0056 (0.05/9) being statistically significant.