TABLE 5.
Paths | Effect | BootSE | Boot95% CI | Effect size ratio | |
|
|||||
Lower limit | Upper limit | ||||
C’ | –0.097 | 0.023 | –0.142 | –0.042 | 48.26% |
a1 b1 | 0.011 | 0.008 | –0.004 | 0.027 | – |
a2 b2 | –0.054 | –0.013 | –0.081 | –0.030 | 26.87% |
a1 a3 b2 | –0.050 | 0.009 | –0.068 | –0.034 | 24.88% |
Total indirect effect | –0.104 | 0.016 | –0.125 | –0.064 | 51.75% |
Total effect | –0.201 | 0.0257 | –0.24 | –0.139 | 100% |
C’, physical activity → Internet addiction; a1b1, physical activity → self-efficacy → internet addiction; a2b2, physical activity → self-control → Internet addiction; a1a3b2, physical activity → self-efficacy → self-control → Internet addiction; a1b1 has the opposite sign of the C’ effect size. And its proportion does not have a good effect size, so it is no longer expressed.