Skip to main content
. 2022 Jul 2;162(3):245–261. doi: 10.1111/jnc.15656

TABLE 2.

DJ‐1 kinetic parameters with MG substrate from kinetic simulation

Rate constant Best‐fit value a Lower boundary a Upper boundary
k 1 (M−1 s−1) 360 123.83 11466.67
k −1 (s−1) 7.82 × 10−2 2.62 × 10−12 4.13
k 2 (k cat ) (s−1) 4.02 × 10−2 3.82 × 10−2 4.27 × 10−2
b Calculated K M (M) 3.29 × 10−4 c 2.76 × 10−4 c 3.63 × 10−4
k 3 (M−1 s−1) 3.25 1.98 104.17
k −3 (s−1) 6.5 × 10−3 d ND d ND
a

Lower and upper boundaries were determined by a published algorithm that varies the rate constants to find values that fall within a 0.83 relative error to the best‐fit (82).

b

The K M was calculated using the definition Km=k1+k2k1.

c

Lower and upper boundaries are not determined directly in KinTek global software for steady‐state constants therefore they were calculated from the collection of rate constants that fit the data within a 0.83 relative error from the best‐fit.

d

KinTek global explorer software only estimates one rate constant when the ratio is being constrained by the equilibrium constant (500 M−1).