Skip to main content
. 2022 Sep 23;13:1012632. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.1012632

Table 1.

Background and clinical features of patients that underwent the MoCA.

N 278
Age (years) 62.8 ± 11.4 (28–88)
Sex (M/F) 64%/36%
Education (years) 11.6 ± 4.4 (5–24)
Handedness (right/left) 94.6%/5.4%
Disease duration (months) 16.7 ± 14.3 (2–120)
ALSFRS-R
Total 39.4 ± 5.6 (22–48)
Bulbar 10.5 ± 1.9 (4–12)
Spinal – lower limbs 11.2 ± 3.9 (0–16)
Spinal – upper limbs 6.3 ± 1.7 (0–8)
Respiratory 11.3 ± 1.4 (5–12)
ΔFS 0.8 ± 0.7 (0–5.2)
KSS
Stage 0 2%
Stage 1 36.5%
Stage 2 33.7%
Stage 3 23.3%
Stage 4 4.4%
MiToS
Stage 0 77.5%
Stage 1 20.1%
Stage 2 2.4%
PEG 0.4%
NIV 4%
Genetics
C9orf72 6.8%
SOD1 2.9%
TARDBP 3.2%
FUS 0.4%
MoCA
Raw scores 23.6 ± 3.6 (11–30)
Below-cut-off scoresa 6.1%
ECAS
Total 100.4 ± 18.1 (39–29)
ALS-specific 74.3 ± 14.8 (22–97)
ALS-nonspecific 26.2 ± 4.9 (9–34)
Language 23.5 ± 3.9 (10–28)
Fluency 16.5 ± 5.5 (0–24)
Executive 34.3 ± 7.6 (7–47)
Memory 14.8 ± 4.5 (1–22)
Visuo-spatial 11.4 ± 1 (6–12)
ECAS-CI 0.7 ± 0.9 (0–5)

ΔFS, progression rate; ALS, amyotrophic laterals sclerosis; ALSFRS-R, Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis Functional Rating Scale-Revised; ECAS, Edinburgh Cognitive and Behavioural ALS Screen; F, female; KSS=King’s staging system; M, male; MiToS, Milano-Torino staging system; MoCA, Montreal Cognitive Assessment; NIV, non-invasive ventilation; PEG, percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy.