Skip to main content
. 2022 May 19;27(8):573–577. doi: 10.1111/resp.14294

FIGURE 3.

FIGURE 3

A prototype nomogram to interpret the strength of the fractional exhaled nitric oxide (FeNO) (‘magnet’) versus eosinophil (‘bomb’) signals: The line linking two biomarker values identifies bomb‐ versus magnet‐predominant asthma. Dashed grey line (—): Example of the nomogram result for a patient with an FeNO of 60 ppb and a blood eosinophil count (Eos) of 0.3 × 109/L, suggesting a magnet‐driven asthma; see Table 1 for other phenotypic characteristics that may influence case interpretations. The cut‐off points and their positions on the nomogram are based on the fact that (a) clinical cut‐off points are 0.15–0.3 × 109/L for blood eosinophils and 20–40 ppb for FeNO, 14 (b) the predictive value of these biomarkers are approximately linear up 0.6 × 109/L and 60 ppb, respectively, in the placebo arms of severe asthma trials 15 and (c) upper values are logarithmically distributed.