Skip to main content
. 2022 Mar 24;52(7):e13766. doi: 10.1111/eci.13766

TABLE 2.

Effect of the interventions on whole plasma CEC, apoB‐depleted CEC, ABCA1‐mediated CEC and passive diffusion

Placebo ATV EVO ATV + EVO Main effect Interaction
(n = 20) (n = 22) (n = 20) (n = 19) p‐value p‐value
ATV EVO ATV vs EVO
Whole plasma CEC (%)
Baseline 18.1 (16.5–19.9) 20.9 (19.0–23.0) 19.5 (17.3–22.0) 19.2 (16.9–21.7) .003 .001 .67
Week 8 17.2 (15.6–19.1) 16.3 (14.5–18.3) 15.4 (13.6–17.4) 13.5 (12.1–15.2)
ApoB‐depleted CEC (%)
Baseline 13.6 (12.8–14.4) 13.9 (13.0–14.8) 14.1 (12.7–15.7) 13.6 (12.5–14.9) .486 .133 .146
Week 8 15.0 (14.2–15.8) 15.3 (14.3–16.4) 15.4 (14.2–16.6) 14.3 (13.3–15.4)
ABCA1‐mediated CEC (%)
Baseline 2.5 (1.8–3.6) 2.9 (2.3–3.8) 2.6 (1.8–3.6) 2.2 (1.6–3.0) .594 .689 .732
Week 8 4.0 (3.4−4.7) 4.5 (3.8–5.3) 4.0 (3.4–4.7) 3.7 (2.8–4.8)
Passive diffusion (%)
Baseline 10.6 (10.0–11.2) 10.6 (10.0–11.2) 11.1 (10.0–12.3) 11.1 (10.4–11.8) .180 .295 .231
Week 8 10.7 (10.0–11.4) 10.7 (10.1–11.3) 11.0 (10.4–11.5) 10.2 (9.8–10.7)

Data presented as geometric mean (95% CI). Bold values denote statistically significance of main effect of treatments compared with the placebo group using maximum‐likelihood random‐effects regression models.

Abbreviations: ABC, ATP‐binding cassette transporter; Apo, apolipoprotein; ATV, atorvastatin; CEC, cholesterol efflux capacity; EVO, evolocumab.