Skip to main content
. 2022 Jun 8;179(18):4473–4485. doi: 10.1111/bph.15866

TABLE 1.

Affinity, potency and efficacy values of the N‐terminal truncated GLP‐2 variants on the GLP‐2R

Competition binding cAMP activation cAMP inhibition
Log IC50 ± SEM Ki (nM) Log EC50 ± SEM EC50 (nM) Emax ± SEM (%) Log IC50 ± SEM IC50 (nM)
GLP‐2(1‐33) −8.7 ± 0.12 2.2 −10.2 ± 0.14 0.06 100 ± 4.7
GLP‐2(2‐33) −8.1 ± 0.11 7.9 −8.1 ± 0.50 7.9 20 ± 3.2 −6.8 ± 0.34 174
GLP‐2(3‐33) −8.1 ± 0.13 8.1 −7.6 ± 0.26 25 21 ± 2.2 −6.7 ± 0.39 204
GLP‐2(4‐33) −8.2 ± 0.16 6.5 −6.8 ± 0.30 158 17 ± 2.6 −7.1 ± 0.18 79
GLP‐2(5‐33) −7.9 ± 0.15 12 −7.6 ± 0.24 25 40 ± 4.1 −6.7 ± 0.34 200
GLP‐2(6‐33) −7.5 ± 0.11 33 −7.4 ± 0.24 40 46 ± 5.1 −6.3 ± 0.71 490
GLP‐2(7‐33) −7.7 ± 0.15 22 −6.9 ± 0.24 126 27 ± 3.8 No inhibition
GLP‐2(8‐33) −7.1 ± 0.12 81 −7.2 ± 0.31 63 19 ± 3.0 No inhibition
GLP‐2(9‐33) −7.1 ± 0.15 81 −6.7 ± 0.08 200 65 ± 3.6 No inhibition
GLP‐2(10‐33) −6.9 ± 0.19 123 No activation −6.39 ± 0.66 398
GLP‐2(11‐33) −6.1 ± 0.53 871 No activation No inhibition

Note: The table displays a summary of the affinity, potency and efficacy values of the N‐terminal truncated GLP‐2 variants on the human GLP‐2R tested in the binding and cAMP accumulation experiments. The values originate from the data shown in Figures 1 and 2 from n = 3 independent experiments carried out in duplicate.