Skip to main content
Wiley Open Access Collection logoLink to Wiley Open Access Collection
. 2022 Jun 15;78(8):3697–3703. doi: 10.1002/ps.7012

Electrophysiological and behavioural responses of Stegobium paniceum to volatile compounds from Chinese medicinal plant materials

Yu Cao 1, Onofrio Marco Pistillo 2, Yibin Lou 1, Ilaria D'Isita 2, Filippo Maggi 3, Qiqi Hu 1, Giacinto Salvatore Germinara 2,✉, Can Li 1,✉
PMCID: PMC9542140  PMID: 35620873

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Stegobium paniceum (Coleoptera, Anobiidae) is an important pest of stored products causing severe damage to dried Chinese medicinal plant materials (CMPMs). Plant volatiles play an important role in host‐searching of insects. The olfactory responses of S. paniceum to the most abundant volatile components of some drugstore attractant CMPMs such as Panax notoginseng, Angelica sinensis, Gastrodia elata and Peucedanum praeruptorum, namely falcarinol, 3‐n‐butylphthalide, p‐cresol and β‐pinene, respectively, were studied by electroantennography (EAG) and behavioural bioassays in six‐ and four‐arm olfactometers.

RESULTS

EAG recordings showed that male and female antennae are able to perceive the test compounds in a wide range of concentrations and in a dose‐dependent manner. Moreover, for each dose of different compounds tested, no significant differences were found between the mean male and female EAG responses. In six‐arm olfactometer bioassays, S. paniceum exhibited positive responses to falcarinol, 3‐n‐butylphthalide, p‐cresol and β‐pinene at doses of 1, 10, 100, 500 and 1000 μg. The most attractive dose was 500 μg for falcarinol, 100 μg for 3‐n‐butylphthalide, 500 μg for p‐cresol and 1000 μg for β‐pinene. Olfactory preferences of S. paniceum, based on comparison of these four compounds at their optimally attractive concentrations in a four‐arm olfactometer, were 3‐n‐butylphthalide > p‐cresol > falcarinol > β‐pinene.

CONCLUSION

The results indicated that the four volatiles of CMPMs are perceived by the peripheral olfactory system of S. paniceum adults and are able to individually elicit a positive chemotaxis in S. paniceum adults confirming the role of chemical cues in host‐plant detection and selection of this pest. Further field studies are needed to evaluate the potential of the attractive compounds identified in this study, particularly 3‐n‐butylphthalide, to be applied as a novel monitoring and control tool against this storage‐beetle pest. © 2022 The Authors. Pest Management Science published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of Society of Chemical Industry.

Keywords: Stegobium paniceum, EAG, olfactory response, Chinese medicinal plant material, volatile organic compounds, concentration


Four compounds identified from the volatiles of Chinese medicinal plant materials (CMPMs) are perceived by the peripheral olfactory system of S. paniceum adults and are able to individually elicit a positive chemotaxis in S. paniceum adults confirming the role of chemical cues in host‐plant detection and selection of this pest.

graphic file with name PS-78-3697-g004.jpg

1. INTRODUCTION

The drugstore beetle, Stegobium paniceum L. (Coleoptera, Anobiidae), is a worldwide pest of stored products. This cosmopolitan insect consumes a wide range of dried plant products, including biological specimens in museum collections. 1 , 2 , 3 Stegobium. paniceum adults typically gnaw their way into food storage containers causing direct damage, and then proceed to lay eggs in the stored products. The hatched larvae then infest these stored materials, with the dead beetles and other wastes remaining inside, causing further spoilage and economic loss. 1 , 2

Currently, fumigants (e.g. phosphine) are considered to provide the most effective means of protecting and disinfesting stored food and other products. 4 , 5 However, the repeated and intensive use of various fumigants has resulted in serious problems, including residues with hazard for human health, pest resistance, pest resurgence and lethal effects on nontarget organisms. 6 Therefore, the development of effective alternative methods to control pests of stored products is needed. Integrated pest management (IPM) is considered a more sustainable and environmentally friendly control strategy for combatting these pests. 3 , 5 , 7

Behavioural manipulation based on the responses of insects to special environmental factors is now an important method of pest control. Thus, certain repellents and attractants, whose functional components are derived from specific plants, are applied to manipulate the behaviour of insects to protect stored products from pest infestation. 8 , 9 , 10 , 11 In our previous study, S. paniceum adults showed significant preferences for volatiles released from several Chinese medicinal plant materials (CMPMs). 12 However, specific volatile components of CMPMs that attracted S. paniceum were not identified.

Medicinal plants are widely grown in China and make a substantial contribution to the economy. S. paniceum is the main pest species responsible for major losses of stored CMPMs in many provinces of China. 1 Because most of these CMPMs are stored before use in human health protection and disease treatments, it is important to devise methods for the management of S. paniceum without risk of contamination of the products. Therefore, there is a keen interest in the development of botanical pesticide alternatives to chemical insecticides for S. paniceum control. Indeed, there is a long history of using botanical insecticides to protect stored products from insect pests. 10 , 13 , 14 However, volatile compounds or other plant products also could be developed as attractants or repellents for pest management. In our previous study, volatile blends from various CMPMs, including Panax notoginseng (Burkill) F.H.Chen (Apiales: Araliaceae), Angelica sinensis (Oliv.) Diels (Apiales: Apiaceae), Gastrodia elata Blume (Asparagales: Orchidaceae) and Peucedanum praeruptorum Dunn (Apiales: Apiaceae), were strongly attractive to S. paniceum, with the most abundant components of these four CMPMs being falcarinol, 3‐n‐butylphthalide, p‐cresol and β‐pinene, respectively. 12

In the present study, the olfactory responses of S. paniceum to these compounds were investigated by electroactennographic (EAG) tests to assess the sensitivity of male and female S. paniceum antennae to the test compounds and by six‐ and four‐arm olfactometer bioassays to evaluate the insects' behavioural response to different concentrations of the same compounds. Such information will help to further elucidate the roles of chemical signals in host selection by S. paniceum and provide a basis for further field studies aiming at developing semiochemical‐based strategies for the safe and effective control of this beetle pest.

2. METHODS AND MATERIALS

2.1. Insect rearing

Stegobium paniceum have been reared in the laboratory of the Department of Biology and Engineering of Environment, Guiyang University since 2017 and maintained on jujube (Ziziphus jujuba Mill.); a laboratory colony from the same population was established at the Department of Agriculture, Food, Natural Resources and Engineering, University of Foggia. The beetles were reared at 28 ± 1 °C, 60 ± 5% relative humidity, and 8 h:16 h, light:dark photoperiod (photophase 09:00 h and 17:00 h), as reported by Li et al. 1 Secondary infestation by moisture‐sensitive mites was prevented using the method of Steiner et al. 15

2.2. Odour stimuli

Falcarinol was purchased from GlpBio (Montclair, NJ, USA), p‐cresol and β‐pinene were purchased from Dr. Ehrenstorfer GmbH (Augsburg, Germany), and 3‐n‐butylphthalide was purchased from Toronto Research Chemicals (North York, Canada). For each compound, mineral oil (Sigma‐Aldrich, Milan, Italy) solutions to be used as test stimuli for EAG (0.001, 0.01, 0.1, 1, 10 μg μL−1) and olfactometer (0.1, 1, 10, 50 and 100 μg μL−1) bioassays were prepared. Solutions were stored at −20°C until needed.

2.3. Electroantennography (EAG)

The antennal sensitivity of S. paniceum males and females to increasing concentrations of the four test compounds was evaluated by EAG using the technique described in our previous studies. 16 , 17 The head of a one‐week‐old specimen was excised using a scalpel and seated between two glass capillary (Micro‐glass, Naples, Italy) electrodes filled with Kaissling saline solution 18 and mounted in stainless steel electrode holders (Syntech Laboratories, Hilversum, the Netherlands). The recording electrode (diameter ~ 100 μm) was put in contact with the dorsal surface of the last antennal segment while the neutral electrode was inserted into the base of the head. AgCl‐coated silver wires were used to maintain the electrical continuity between the antennal preparation and an AC/DC UN‐6 amplifier in DC mode (Syntech Laboratories). The amplifier was connected to a PC equipped with the EAG 2.0 program (Syntech Laboratories).

For each test compound, 10 μL of different mineral oil solutions giving the 0.01, 0.1, 1, 10 and 100 μg doses, was adsorbed onto a filter paper (Whatman No. 1) strip (2 cm2) inserted in a Pasteur pipette (15 cm long) which was used as an odour cartridge. Using a disposable syringe, vapour stimuli (3 cm3) were puffed for 1 s (0.35 m s−1) into a charcoal‐filtered and humidified air flow (500 mL min−1) passing over the antenna through a stainless‐steel delivery tube [1 cm inner diameter (i.d.)] whose outlet was positioned ~1 cm from the antenna. Control (10 μL mineral oil) and standard (5 μL of 10 μg μL−1 (Z)‐3‐hexenol mineral oil solution; Sigma‐Aldrich) stimuli also were applied at the beginning of the experiment and after each group of four test stimuli. The intervals between stimuli were 1 min. Each dose of the four compounds was tested on five different antennae from different males and females.

The maximum amplitude of negative polarity deflection (–mV) elicited by a stimulus was used to measure the EAG responses. 17 To compensate for solvent and/or mechanosensory artifacts, the absolute amplitude (mV) of the EAG response to each test stimulus was subtracted by the mean EAG response to the two nearest solvent controls. 18 Moreover, to compensate for the decrease in the antennal responsiveness during the experiment, the resulting EAG amplitude was corrected according to the reduction of the EAG response to the standard stimulus. 19 Dose–response curves were calculated based on the corrected EAG values.

2.4. Six‐arm olfactometer bioassays

The behavioural responses of adult S. paniceum to falcarinol, 3‐n‐butylphthalide, p‐cresol and β‐pinene solutions were evaluated in a six‐arm olfactometer according to the method reported by Cao et al. 20 Each arm was connected to a 25‐mL glass vessel via Teflon® tubing, and each glass vessel contained a test or control stimulus (10 μL). Aliquots (10 μL) of each of the five concentrations (0.1, 1, 10, 50 and 100 μg μL−1) of each compound and mineral oil (used as control), adsorbed onto a filter paper disk (1.0 cm diameter), were used as stimuli.

In order to drive the odour source towards the insects, the airflow was set at 200 mL min−1. Stegobium paniceum unsexed adults, 2–3 days postemergence and starved for 4 h, were introduced into the olfactometer in groups of 180 individuals, using a brush. After 30 min, S. paniceum that entered the arms of the olfactometer were counted and considered as either having made a choice for a particular odour source, or were considered as ‘nonresponders’. Bioassays were replicated six times and carried out between 09:00 h and 17:00 h, at room temperature (RT; 25 ± 1 °C). After each replication, the olfactometer was cleaned, dried and the arms were rotated (60°). 12

2.5. Four‐arm olfactometer bioassays

In the six‐arm olfactometer bioassays, falcarinol, 3‐n‐butylphthalide, p‐cresol and β‐pinene showed the highest attractiveness to S. paniceum at concentrations of 50, 10, 50 and 100 μg μL−1, respectively. Therefore, the attractant power of the four compounds at their optimal concentrations were compared in a four‐arm olfactometer, using the method of Liu et al. 21 The olfactometer consisted of a central glass chamber (15 cm i.d., 6 cm length) with four arms (1.5 cm i.d., 10 cm length), each connected to a glass tube (1.5 cm i.d., 20 cm length). Each arm was connected via Teflon® tubing to a 25‐mL glass vessel that contained the test or control stimulus (10 μL), and the airflow was set at 200 mL min−1. Beetles were introduced into the central part of the olfactometer chamber in groups of 120 individuals. ‘Responders’ and ‘nonresponders’ were determined using the criteria described for the six‐arm olfactometer bioassays. Bioassays were replicated six times and were carried out between 09:00 a.m. and 5:00 p.m, at RT (25 ± 1 °C). After each replication, the olfactometer was cleaned, dried and the arms were rotated (90°). The odour treatments were set as follows:

  1. mineral oil, falcarinol, 3‐n‐butylphthalide and p‐cresol;

  2. mineral oil, falcarinol, 3‐n‐butylphthalide and β‐pinene;

  3. mineral oil, falcarinol, p‐cresol and β‐pinene;

  4. mineral oil, 3‐n‐butylphthalide, p‐cresol and β‐pinene.

2.6. Statistical analysis

In order to verify antennal activation, the corrected mean EAG response of males and females to the last dilution of each test compound was compared to a ‘0’ value using one‐sample Student's t‐test and regarded as ‘activated’ if significant at P = 0.05. Saturation level was taken as the lowest dilution at which the mean response was equal to or less than the previous one. 22 The mean EAG responses of males and females to each stimulus were compared using Student's t‐test for independent samples at P = 0.05. Male and female EAG responses to each test stimulus were not significantly different; therefore, they were pooled and analyzed together. For each of the 0.1, 1, 10 and 100 μg doses of the four compounds the mean EAG responses of adult S. paniceum were submitted to ANOVA followed by Tukey's honestly significant difference (HSD) test (P = 0.05) for separation of means. Data were log10x‐transformed to satisfy the assumption of normality (Shapiro–Wilk test) and assessed for homogeneity of variances (Levene's test) before ANOVA.

Because there was no difference in response to odour stimuli between S. paniceum males and females, 12 the male and female responses in different behavioural bioassays were pooled and analyzed together. The numbers of insects found in the different arms of the six‐arm and four‐arm olfactometers were subjected to Friedman two‐way ANOVA by ranks and, in the case of significance (P < 0.05), the Wilcoxon signed ranks test was used to determine differences among means. All statistical analyses were performed using SPSS 18.0 for Windows (SPSS Inc., Chicago, IL, USA).

3. RESULTS

3.1. EAG

The EAG responses of S. paniceum males and females to increasing doses of falcarinol, 3‐n‐butylphthalide, β‐pinene and p‐cresol are reported in Fig. 1. All compounds elicited measurable EAG responses starting from the 0.1‐μg dose (P < 0.05 in all one‐sample Student's t‐test). In the dose range tested, typical sigmoid‐shaped dose–responses were elicited by test compounds in both males and females. The mean EAG response to the highest dose was higher than that to the previous dose for all compounds indicating that no saturation of olfactory receptors occurred at the lowest dose. For each dose of the four compounds no significant differences were found between the mean EAG responses of males and females (falcarinol: t = 0.447–1.965, df = 8, P = 0.086–0.667; 3‐n‐butylphthalide: t = 1.095–1.843; df = 8, P = 0.103–0.305; β‐pinene: t = 0.485–1.818; df = 8, P = 0.107–0.640; p‐cresol: t = 0.615–1.175; df = 8, P = 0.274–0.556).

Figure 1.

Figure 1

Mean (± SE) EAG dose–response curves of male and female S. paniceum antennae to ascending doses of falcarinol, 3‐n‐butylphthalide, p‐cresol and β‐pinene. For each dose, mean male and female EAG responses were not significant different (Student's t‐test for independent samples, P = 0.05).

ANOVA revealed significant differences among the mean pooled male and female EAG responses to the four compounds at the 0.1 (F = 89.598, df = 3, P < 0.001), 1 (F = 34.870, df = 3, P < 0.001), 10 (F = 34.216, df = 3, P < 0.001) and 100 μg (F = 28.813, df = 3, P < 0.001) doses. At 0.1, 1 and 10 μg, the mean EAG responses elicited by 3‐n‐butylphthalide were significantly higher than those induced by falcarinol, p‐cresol and β‐pinene (P < 0.05, Tukey's HSD test) (Fig. 2). At 100 μg, the EAG responses to 3‐n‐butylphthalide and falcarinol were statistically similar and significantly higher than those to p‐cresol and β‐pinene (P < 0.05, Tukey's HSD test).

Figure 2.

Figure 2

EAG responses of male and female S. paniceum antennae to different doses of falcarinol, 3‐n‐butylphthalide, p‐cresol and β‐pinene. For each dose, different letters indicate significant differences (Tukey's HSD test, P < 0.05).

3.2. Six‐arm olfactometer bioassays

In these bioassays, mineral oil controls were significantly less attractive than all doses tested of falcarinol (Friedman test: χ2 = 29.498, df = 5, P < 0.001; Wilcoxon tests: P = 0.027–0.028), 3‐n‐butylphthalide (Friedman test: χ2 = 29.238, df = 5, P < 0.001; Wilcoxon tests: P = 0.026–0.027), p‐cresol (Friedman test: χ2 = 29.238, df = 5, P < 0.001; Wilcoxon tests: P = 0.027–0.028) and β‐pinene (Friedman test: χ2 = 29.048, df = 5, P < 0.001; Wilcoxon tests: P = 0.026–0.028) (Fig. 3).

Figure 3.

Figure 3

Olfactory responses of S. paniceum to different doses of falcarinol, 3‐n‐butylphthalide, p‐cresol and β‐pinene in a six‐arm olfactometer. The control was mineral oil. Each box plot represents the median and its range of dispersion (lower and upper quartiles and outliers). Above each box plot, different letters indicate significant differences (Wilcoxon test, P < 0.05).

There also were significant differences in attractiveness among different doses of each compound. Significantly more insects entered the arms connected to the vessels that contained 500 μg falcarinol (Wilcoxon tests: P = 0.024–0.028), 100 μg (Wilcoxon tests: P = 0.027) and 500 μg (Wilcoxon tests: P = 0.024–0.027) of 3‐n‐butylphthalide, 500 μg (Wilcoxon tests: P = 0.026–0.027) and 1000 μg (Wilcoxon tests: P = 0.027–0.028) of p‐cresol, and 500 μg (Wilcoxon tests: P = 0.024–0.027) and 1000 μg (Wilcoxon tests: P = 0.027) of β‐pinene relative to the arms with the other doses (Fig. 3).

3.3. Four‐arm olfactometer bioassays

Based on the results of six‐arm olfactometer bioassays, the most attractive doses of falcarinol, 3‐n‐butylphthalide, p‐cresol and β‐pinene were 500, 100, 500 and 1000 μg, respectively. Using these doses, the compounds were compared in multiple‐choice tests carried out in four‐arm olfactometer bioassays (Fig. 4). In all experiments, mineral oil, the control, was the least attractive stimulus chosen. The beetles significantly preferred 3‐n‐butylphthalide to p‐cresol and falcarinol (𝜒2 = 18.000, df = 3, P < 0.01), to falcarinol and β‐pinene (𝜒2 = 18.000, df = 3, P < 0.01), and to p‐cresol and β‐pinene (𝜒2 = 18.000, df = 3, P < 0.01). Insects were significantly more attracted to p‐cresol than to falcarinol and β‐pinene (𝜒2 = 18.000, df = 3, P < 0.01) (Fig. 4).

Figure 4.

Figure 4

Olfactory responses of S. paniceum to falcarinol, 3‐n‐butyl phthalide, p‐cresol and β‐pinene (at their most attractive concentrations) in a four‐arm olfactometer. The control was mineral oil, and the tested concentrations for falcarinol, 3‐n‐butylphthalide, p‐cresol and β‐pinene were 50, 10, 50 and 100 μg μL−1, respectively. Each box plot represents the median and its range of dispersion (lower and upper quartiles and outliers). Above each box plot, different letters indicate significant differences (Wilcoxon test, P < 0.05).

4. DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS

Phytophagous insects rely on semiochemicals to locate suitable food materials, and mating and oviposition sites. 23 , 24 , 25 Qualitatively and quantitatively different blends of volatiles from different plant species allow insects to discriminate and locate their preferred host plants. 25 , 26 The stored‐product pests, Sitophilus oryzae (L.), 27 S. zeamais Motschulsky, 28 , 29 S. granarius (L.) (Colepotera, Curculionidae), 24 Oryzaephilus surinamensis (L.) (Coleoptera, Silvanidae) 30 and Callosobruchus maculatus (F.) (Coleoptera, Bruchidae), 31 have been widely reported to be attracted to particular volatiles from some cereals and other stored products.

In our previous investigation, S. paniceum showed significant olfactory preferences for the volatiles of four CMPMs (i.e. P. notoginseng, A. sinensis, G. elata and P. praeruptorum). In the present study, falcarinol, 3‐n‐butylphthalide, p‐cresol and β‐pinene, as the most abundant volatiles of the aforementioned CMPMs, respectively, were shown to be perceived by the peripheral olfactory systems of S. paniceum males and females in a dose‐dependent manner.

Once the electrophysiological activity of the four compounds was ascertained, their biological activity was further investigated in six‐ and four‐arm olfactometer bioassays. All compounds were significantly attractive to S. paniceum in a range of concentrations (0.1–100 μg μL−1) and when the four compounds were compared at their optimally attractive concentrations, the order of olfactory preferences was 3‐n‐butylphthalide > p‐cresol > falcarinol > β‐pinene. Therefore, it seems that, amongst these volatiles, 3‐n‐butylphthalide has the greatest potential for development as a lure for S. paniceum. Although it is well‐known that the behavioural response elicited by a compound is not directly related to its electrophysiological activity, it is worth noting that, in the dose range tested, 3‐n‐buthylphthalide also was the strongest antennal stimulant of S. paniceum adults. This compound has a wide range of pharmacological effects and is widely used for the treatment of ischaemic stroke because of its low toxicity and safety. 32 It also showed neuroprotection by reducing β‐amyloid‐induced toxicity in neuronal cells. 33 Furthermore, it was shown to possess larvicidal and adulticidal activity against Drosophila melanogaster (Meig) 34 and antifungal activity against Candida albicans (CP Robin) Berkhout. 35 In a previous study, of 33 plant species tested, the Angelica sinensis essential oil (EO) showed the best repellent activity against Aedes aegypti (L.), and 3‐n‐buthylphthalide was identified as one of the main EO components. 36 However, to the best of our knowledge, there are no reports investigating the behavioural response of any insect species to this compound.

More than 40 years ago, a female‐produced sex pheromone of S. paniceum was identified, 37 , 38 and has received commercial interest for pest monitoring in herbarium collections. 39 , 40 , 41 Combined application of host plant volatiles and pheromones might be more effective for monitoring and control of S. paniceum, as shown for other pests. 27 , 42 , 43 , 44 , 45 , 46

Interestingly, the order of olfactory preference of S. paniceum for the odours of the above mentioned CMPMs previously was shown to be P. notoginseng > A. sinensis > G. elata > P. praeruptorum, 12 whereas the preference ranking for their main components at the most attractive dose was 3‐n‐butylphthalide (A. sinensis) > p‐cresol (G. elata) > falcarinol (P. notoginseng) > β‐pinene (P. praeruptorum). This discordance might result from differences in the levels of the most abundant compounds among the volatiles from the four CMPMs, under natural conditions. In addition, although insects exhibited responses to individual compounds, their behaviour also can be influenced by specific blends of volatiles. 47 , 48 , 49 Further research is needed to determine the behavioural activity of additional individual volatiles of these four CMPMs and their various blends to confirm the functional compounds and/or mixtures, which mediate the behavioural responses involved in the olfactory preferences of S. paniceum to different CMPMs. In addition, additive or synergistic attractants might be identified for the management of this pest beetle based on these bioassays.

This study confirmed that semiochemical volatiles participate directly in the interactions between S. paniceum and host CMPMs. Two parasitic wasps, Lariophagus distinguendus Forster and Theocolax elegans Westwood, which are natural enemies of S. paniceum, are attracted to volatiles of stored cereal grains which represent the preferred substrates of their hosts. 16 , 22 , 50 Therefore volatile compounds identified from CMPMs that could be attractive to both S. paniceum and S. paniceum parasitoids deserve further research. This information could provide a theoretical framework for establishing a biocontrol system, based on CMPM volatiles, in which parasitoids are used to control S. paniceum infesting CMPMs.

Overall, this study demonstrated that semiochemical volatiles of CMPMs are involved in host‐plant selection by S. paniceum. It also showed how individual compounds previously identified as the main volatile components of different attractive CMPMs are able to stimulate the peripheral olfactory systems and elicit a positive chemotactic response in adult drugstore beetle. The most attractive 3‐n‐butylphthalide found in this study provides a basis for further field‐trapping experiments to develop semiochemically‐based monitoring tools and direct control options for S. paniceum.

AUTHOR CONTRIBUTIONS

YC, GSG and CL conceived and designed the research; YBL, OMP, JW, ID and QQH conducted the experiments; YC and GSG analyzed the data; and YC, FM and GSG wrote the manuscript. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

CONFLICTS OF INTEREST

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS

We thank the First‐class Discipline Construction of Guizhou Province (XKTJ[2020]14), the Training Project for High‐Level Innovative Talents in Guizhou Province (No. 2016 [4020]), National Innovation and Entrepreneurship Training Program for College Students (201910976014, 202010976003), and Graduate Program from Guiyang University (GYU‐YJS[2021]‐15) for financial support. Open Access Funding provided by Universita degli Studi di Foggia within the CRUI‐CARE Agreement.

Contributor Information

Giacinto Salvatore Germinara, Email: giacinto.germinara@unifg.it.

Can Li, Email: lican790108@163.com.

DATA AVAILABILITY STATEMENT

The data that support the findings of this study are openly available in [repository name] at [DOI], reference number [reference number].

REFERENCES

  • 1. Li C, Li ZZ, Cao Y, Zheng XW and Zhou B, Partial characterization of stressinduced carboxylesterase from adults of Stegobium paniceum and Lasioderma serricorne (Coleoptera: Anobiidae) subjected to CO2‐enriched atmosphere. J Pest Sci 1:7–11 (2009). [Google Scholar]
  • 2. Benelli G, Pacini N, Conti B and Canale A, Following a scented beetle: larval faeces as a key olfactory cue in host location of Stegobium paniceum (coleoptera: anobiidae) by Lariophagus distinguendus (hymenoptera: Pteromalidae). Chem 2:129–136 (2013). [Google Scholar]
  • 3. Hironaka M, Kamura T, Osada M, Sasaki R, Shinoda K, Hariyama T et al., Adults of Lasioderma serricorne and stegobium paniceum (Anobiidae: Coleoptera) are attracted to ultraviolet (uv) over blue light leds. J Econ Entomol 110:1–5 (2017). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4. Zettler JL and Keevr DW, Phosphine resistance in the cigarette beetle (Coleoptera: Anobiidae) associated with tobacco storage in the southeastern United States. J Econ Entomol 87:546–550 (1994). [Google Scholar]
  • 5. Querner P, Insect pests and integrated pest management in museums, libraries and historic buildings. Insects 2:595–607 (2015). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6. Jovanović Z, Kostić M and Popović Z, Grain protective properties of herbal extracts against the bean weevil Acanthoscelides obtectus say. Ind Crops Prod 26:100–104 (2007). [Google Scholar]
  • 7. Kim S, Park C, Ohh MH, Cho HC and Ahn YJ, Contact and fumigant activity of aromatic plant extracts and essential oils against Lasioderma serricorne (Coleoptera: Anobiidae). J Stored Prod Res 39:11–19 (2003). [Google Scholar]
  • 8. Kaplan I, Attracting carnivorous arthropods with plant volatiles: the future of biocontrol or playing with fire? Biol Control 60:77–89 (2012). [Google Scholar]
  • 9. Guo SS, Geng ZF, Zhang WJ, Liang JY, Wang CF, Deng ZW et al., The chemical composition of essential oils from Cinnamomum camphora and their insecticidal activity against the stored product pests. Int J Mol Sci 17:1836 (2016). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10. Pavela R and Benelli G, Essential oils as ecofriendly biopesticides? challenges and constraints. Trends Plant Sci 21:1000–1007 (2016). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11. Liang JY, Wang WT, Zheng YF, Zhang D, Wang JL, Guo SS et al., Bioactivities and chemical constituents of essential oil extracted from Artemisia anethoides against two stored product insects. J Oleo Sci 66:71–76 (2017). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12. Cao Y, Li S, Benelli G, Germinara GS, Yang J, Yang WJ et al., Olfactory responses of Stegobium paniceum to different Chinese medicinal plant materials and component analysis of volatiles. J Stored Prod Res 76:122–128 (2018). [Google Scholar]
  • 13. Isman MB, Botanical insecticides, deterrents, and repellents in modern agriculture and an increasingly regulated world. Annu Rev Entomol 51:45–66 (2006). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14. Dubey NK and Srivastavab KA, Current status of plant products as botanical pesticides in storage pest management. J Biopest 1:182–186 (2008). [Google Scholar]
  • 15. Steiner S, Steidle JLM and Ruther J, Host‐associated kairomones used for habitat orientation in the parasitoid Lariophagus distinguendus (hymenoptera: Pteromalidae). J Stored Prod Res 43:587–593 (2007). [Google Scholar]
  • 16. Germinara GS, De CA and Rotundo G, Electrophysiological and behavioral responses of Theocolax elegans (Westwood) (hymenoptera: Pteromalidae) to cereal grain volatiles. Biomed Res Int 2016:1–8 (2016). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17. Germinara GS, Pistillo M, Griffo R, Garonna AP and Di Palma A, Electroantennographic responses of Aromia bungii (Faldermann, 1835) (Coleoptera, Cerambycidae) to a range of volatile compounds. Insects 10:274 (2019). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18. Kaissling KE and Thorson J, Insect olfactory sensilla: structural, chemical and electrical aspects of the functional organization, in Receptors for Neurotransmitters, Hormones, and Pheromones in Insects, ed. by Satelle DB, Hall LM and Hildebrand JG. Elsevier/North‐Holland Biomedical Press, New York, pp. 261–282 (1980). [Google Scholar]
  • 19. Den Otter CJ, Tchicaya T and Schutte AM, Effects of age, sex and hunger on the antennal olfactory sensitivity of tsetse flies. Physiol Entomol 16:173–182 (1991). [Google Scholar]
  • 20. Cao Y, Benelli G, Germinara GS, Maggi F, Zhang Y, Luo SL et al., Innate positive chemotaxis to paeonal from highly attractive chinese medicinal herbs in the cigarette beetle, Lasioderma serricorne. Sci Rep 9:6995 (2019). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21. Liu XF, Chen HH, Li JK, Zhang R and Chen L, Volatiles released by Chinese liquorice roots mediate host location behaviour by neonate Porphyrophora sophorae, (Hemiptera: Margarodidae). Pest Manage Sci 72:1959–1964 (2016). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22. Germinara GS, Cristofaro AD and Rotundo G, Antennal olfactory responses to individual cereal volatiles in Theocolax elegans, (Westwood) (hymenoptera: Pteromalidae). J Stored Prod Res 3:195–200 (2009). [Google Scholar]
  • 23. Bruce TJA, Wadhams LJ and Woodcock CM, Insect host location: a volatile situation. Trends Plant Sci 10:269–274 (2005). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24. Germinara GS, Cristofaro AD and Rotundo G, Behavioral responses of adult Sitophilus granarius to individual cereal volatiles. J Chem Ecol 4:523–529 (2008). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25. Knolhoff LM and Heckel DG, Behavioral assays for studies of host plant choice and adaptation in herbivorous insects. Annu Rev Entomol 59:263–278 (2014). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26. Beyaert I and Hilker M, Plant odour plumes as mediators of plant–insect interactions. Biol Rev 89:68–81 (2014). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27. Phillips TW, Jiang XL, Burkholder WE, Phillips JK and Tran HQ, Behavioural responses to food volatiles by two species of stored‐product Coleoptera, Sitophilus oryzae (Curculionidae) and Tribolium castaneum (Tenebrionidae). J Chem Ecol 19:723–734 (1993). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28. Tang Q, Wu Y, Liu B and Yu Z, Infochemical‐mediated preference behavior of the maize weevil, Sitophilus zeamais Motschulsky, when searching for its hosts. Entomol Fenn 19:257–267 (2008). [Google Scholar]
  • 29. Ukeh DA, Birkett MA, Bruce TJ, Allan EJ, Pickett JA and Mordue AJ, Behavioural responses of the maize weevil, Sitophilus zeamais, to host (storedgrain) and non‐host plant volatiles. Pest Manage Sci 1:44–50 (2010). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30. Trematerra P, Sciaretta A and Tamasi E, Behavioural responses of Oryzaephilus surinamensis, Tribolium castaneum and Tribolium confusum to naturally and artificially damaged durum wheat kernels. Entomol Exp Appl 94:195–200 (2000). [Google Scholar]
  • 31. Ndomo‐Moualeu AF, Ulrichs C and Adler C, Behavioral responses of callosobruchus maculatus, to volatile organic compounds found in the headspace of dried green pea seeds. J Pest Sci 3:1–10 (2015). [Google Scholar]
  • 32. Abdoulaye IA and Guo YJ, A review of recent advances in neuroprotective potential of 3‐n‐butylphthalide and its derivatives. Biomed Res Int 2016:1–9 (2016). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33. Peng Y, Xing C, Lemere CA, Chen G, Wang L, Feng Y et al., L‐3‐n‐butylphthalide ameliorates β‐amyloid‐induced neuronal toxicity in cultured neuronal cells. Neurosci Lett 434:224–229 (2008). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34. Tsukamoto T, Ishikawa Y and Miyazawa M, Larvicidal and adulticidal activity of alkylphthalide derivatives from rhizome of Cnidium officinale against Drosophila melanogaster . J Agric Food Chem 53:5549–5553 (2005). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35. Gong Y, Liu W, Huang X, Hao L, Li Y and Sun S, Antifungal activity and potential mechanism of N‐butylphthalide alone and in combination with fluconazole against Candida albicans. Front Microbiol 10:1461 (2019). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36. Champakaew D, Junkum A, Chaithong U, Jitpakdi A, Riyong D, Sanghong R et al., Angelica sinensis (Umbelliferae) with proven repellent properties against Aedes aegypti, the primary dengue fever vector in Thailand . Parasitol Res 114:2187–2198 (2015). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37. Kuwahara Y, Fukami H, Howard R, Ishii S, Matsumura F and Burkholder WE, Chemical studies on the Anobiidae: sex pheromone of the drugstore beetle, Stegobium paniceum (L.) (Coleoptera). Tetrahedron 34:1769–1774 (1978). [Google Scholar]
  • 38. Kodama H, Ono M, Kohno M and Ohnishi A, Stegobiol, a new sex pheromone component of drugstore beetle (Stegobium paniceum L.). J Chem Ecol 13:1871–1879 (1987). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39. Child RE and Pinniger DB, Insect trapping in museums and historic houses. Stud Conserv 39:129–131 (1994). [Google Scholar]
  • 40. Phillips TW, Semiochemicals of stored‐product insects: research and applications. J Stored Prod Res 33:17–30 (1997). [Google Scholar]
  • 41. Phillips TW and Throne JE, Biorational approaches to managing stored‐product insects. Annu Rev Entomol 55:375–397 (2010). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 42. Landolt PJ and Phillips TW, Host plant influence on sex pheromone behavior of phytophagous insects. Annu Rev Entomol 42:371–391 (1997). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 43. Reddy GVP and Guerrero A, Interactions of insect pheromones and plant semiochemicals. Trends Plant Sci 9:253–261 (2004). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 44. Pope TW, Campbell C, Hardie J, Pickett JA and Wadhams LJ, Interactions between host‐plant volatiles and the sex pheromones of the bird cherry‐oat aphid, Rhopalosiphum padi and the damson‐hop aphid, Phorodon humuli. J Chem Ecol 33:157–165 (2007). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 45. Varela N, Avilla J, Anton S and Gemeno C, Synergism of pheromone and host‐plant volatile blends in the attraction of Grapholita molesta males. Entomol Exp Appl 141:114–122 (2011). [Google Scholar]
  • 46. Baroffio CA, Sigsgaard L, Ahrenfeldt EJ, Borg‐Karlson AK, Bruun SA, Cross JV et al., Combining plant volatiles and pheromones to catch two insect pests in the same trap: examples from two berry crops. Crop Prot 109:1–8 (2018). [Google Scholar]
  • 47. Rojas CJ, Electrophysiological and behavioural responses of the cabbage moth to plant volatiles. J Chem Ecol 25:1867–1883 (1999). [Google Scholar]
  • 48. Tasin M, Backamanì AC, Bengtsson M, Ioriatti C and Witzgall P, Essential host plant cues in the grapevine moth. Naturwissenschaften 93:141–144 (2006). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 49. Najar‐Rodriguez AJ, Galizia CG, Stierle J and Dorn S, Behavioral and neurophysiological responses of an insect to changing ratios of constituents in host plant‐derived volatile mixtures. J Exp Biol 213:3388–3397 (2010). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 50. Querner P and Biebl S, Using parasitoid wasps in integrated Pest management in museums against biscuit beetle (Stegobium paniceum) and webbing clothes moth (Tineola bisselliella). J Entomol Acarol Res 2:169–175 (2012). [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Data Availability Statement

The data that support the findings of this study are openly available in [repository name] at [DOI], reference number [reference number].


Articles from Pest Management Science are provided here courtesy of Wiley

RESOURCES