Skip to main content
. 2022 Sep 28;23(1):1–6. doi: 10.1080/15384047.2022.2128608

Table 2.

Comparing frequency of mutated genes in samples with amplification burden in the top 10% of samples vs. those in the bottom 90% using WGS or the FM panel (see also Supplemental Table S1 for the FM gene list) for both TCGA and UCSD datasets.

Gene Top 10% of amplifications Bottom 90% of amplifications Odds Ratio [CI95%] Bonferroni adjusted p-value
TCGA dataset comparing frequency of mutated genes in samples with amplifications in the top 10% vs. those in the bottom 90% using WGS*
TP53**** 449/727 (61.8%) 2448/6519 (37.6%) 2.7 [2.3–3.1] <0.00001 TP53 alterations associated with increased amplifications while BRAF and KRAS alterations associated with decreased amplifications
BRAF 17/727 (2.3%) 591/6519 (9.1%) 0.2 [0.1–0.4] <0.00001
KRAS 34/727 (4.7%) 611/6519 (9.4%) 0.5 [0.3–0.7] 0.008
GATA3
29/727 (4.0%)
159/6519 (2.4%)
1.7 [1.1–2.5]
Not significant
TCGA dataset comparing frequency of mutated genes in samples with amplifications in the top 10% vs. those in the bottom 90% using FM panel**
TP53 481/732 (65.7%) 2416/6514 (37.1%) 3.3 [2.8–3.8] <0.003 TP53 alterations associated with increased amplifications while BRAF and KRAS alterations associated with decreased amplifications
BRAF 16/732 (2.2%) 592/6514 (9.1%) 0.2 [0.1–0.4] <0.003
KRAS 25/732 (3.4%) 620/6514 (9.5%) 0.3 [0.2–0.5] <0.003
GATA3
32/732 (4.4%)
156/6514 (2.4%)
1.9 [1.3–2.7]
Not significant
UCSD dataset comparing frequency of mutated genes in samples with amplifications in the top 10% vs. those in the bottom 90% using FM panel***
TP53 117/185 (63.2%) 707/1706 (41.4%) 2.4 [1.8–3.3] <0.003 TP53 alterations associated with increased amplifications
BRAF 4/185 (2.2%) 107/1706 (6.3%) 0.3 [0.1–0.9] Not significant
KRAS 32/185 (17.3%) 259/1706 (15.2%) 1.2 [0.8–1.7] Not significant
GATA3 11/185 (5.9%) 35/1706 (2.1%) 3.0 [1.5–6.0] Not significant

*Using the TCGA cohort, which consists of 7,246 cancer samples, the 90th percentile for number of amplifications using WGS was calculated to be 1,016. The 90th percentile for number of amplifications using the FM panel was calculated to be 15.

** The FM panel includes 321 genes (see supplemental Table S1).

*** Using the UCSD dataset, which consists of 1,891 cancer samples, the 90th percentile for number of amplifications (FM panel) was calculated to be 9.

**** Refers to number of samples with designated gene mutation/total samples in that subgroup. For instance, within TCGA database, 727 samples were in the top 10% for amplification burden (“amplificators”); of these 727 samples, 449 (65.7%) had a TP53 mutation.

Abbreviations: FM = Foundation Medicine; TCGA = The Cancer Genome Atlas; UCSD = University of California San Diego; WGS = whole genome sequencing.