Skip to main content
. 2022 Oct 7;34(6):3141–3156. doi: 10.1007/s10811-022-02848-2

Table 7.

Texture parameters determined by the TPA method

Sample DH DC PH PC UH UC
Hardness(N) 10.20 ± 1.52 a 2.72 ± 1.24 b 1.01 ± 0.22 c 0.91 ± 0.13 c 2.43 ± 0.77 d 1.85 ± 0.78 d
Adhesiveness (g*sec) –19.11 ± 9.19 a –25.83 ± 16.23 a –4.53 ± 2.68 b –7.39 ± 4.73 b –3.61 ± 2.35 c –9.08 ± 5.62 d
Springiness 0.95 ± 0.08 a 0.98 ± 0.07 a 0.98 ± 0.01 b 1.00 ± 0.07 b 0.95 ± 0.03 c 0.89 ± 0.06 d
Cohesiveness 0.90 ± 0.10 a 0.92 ± 0.04 a 0.84 ± 0.35b 0.79 ± 0.09 c 0.83 ± 0.05 c 0.74 ± 0.08 d
Chewiness 8.83 ± 2.30 a 2.45 ± 1.17 b 0.83 ± 0.18 c 0.71 ± 0.10 c 1.91 ± 0.60 c 1.23 ± 0.56 d
Resilience 0.77 ± 0.10 a 0.45 ± 0.03 b 0.32 ± 0.02 b 0.26 ± 0.02 c 0.24 ± 0.03 c 0.18 ± 0.04 d

Different superscripts in the same row indicate significant differences between treatments in each seaweed. Values are expressed as mean ± standard deviation (n = 10)

Nomenclature: DH hydrated D. antarctica, DC cooked D. antarctica, PH hydrated Pyropia spp., PC cooked Pyropia spp, UH hydrated U. lactuca, UC cooked U. Lactuca