Skip to main content
. 2022 Jan 19;24(3):551–561. doi: 10.1002/ejhf.2419

Table 2.

Cox proportional‐hazard models for each ventricular arrhythmia outcome according to randomized treatment assignment

Outcome Sacubitril/valsartan Enalapril Hazard ratio (95% CI)
n/N (%) Event rate per 100 patient years (95% CI) n/N (%) Event rate per 100 patient years (95% CI) Primary analysis a Adjusted analysis b
Ventricular arrhythmia 145/4187 (3.5) 1.6 (1.4–1.9) 188/4212 (4.5) 2.1 (1.8–2.4) 0.76 (0.62–0.95); p = 0.015 0.78 (0.62–0.96); p = 0.021
Ventricular arrhythmia/ICD shock/resuscitated cardiac arrest 165/4187 (3.9) 1.8 (1.6–2.1) 207/4212 (4.9) 2.3 (2.0–2.6) 0.79 (0.65–0.97); p = 0.025 0.81 (0.66–0.99); p = 0.039
VT/VF/ventricular flutter/torsades de pointes 133/4175 (3.2) 1.5 (1.2–1.7) 171/4195 (4.1) 1.9 (1.6–2.2) 0.77 (0.62–0.97); p = 0.027 0.79 (0.63–0.99); p = 0.043

CI, confidence interval; ICD, implantable cardioverter defibrillator; VF, ventricular fibrillation; VT, ventricular tachycardia.

a

Primary analysis included randomized treatment and region.

b

Adjusted analysis included randomized treatment, region, beta‐blocker use, angiotensin‐converting enzyme inhibitor use, angiotensin receptor blocker use, mineralocorticoid receptor antagonist use, ischaemic aetiology, ejection fraction, presence of ICD or cardiac resynchronization therapy, New York Heart Association class, hypertension, diabetes, past hospitalization for heart failure, estimated glomerular filtration rate, log‐transformed N‐terminal pro B‐type natriuretic peptide.