Skip to main content
. 2022 Oct 7;101(40):e30919. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000030919

Table 2.

Descriptive statistics of pretreatment (T0), post-treatment (T1) and treatment variations (T0-T1).

Damon Q Invisalign® Significance between
T0① T1② T0-T1③ T0④ T1⑤ T0-T1⑥ ①④ ②⑤ ③⑥
SNA (°) 82.00 ± 3.64 81.49 ± 3.60 0.51 ± 0.81 82.94 ± 2.88 82.39 ± 2.53 0.55 ± 2.07 0.15* 0.29 0.84*
SNB (°) 76.59 ± 3.32 76.36 ± 3.37 0.23 ± 0.91 78.79 ± 4.71 77.38 ± 3.26 1.41 ± 3.20 0.08 0.24 0.19*
ANB (°) 5.41 ± 2.05 5.17 ± 1.95 0.24 ± 0.84 4.91 ± 2.04 5.02 ± 1.76 −0.10 ± 1.87 0.97* 0.76 0.33*
MP-SN (°) 35.77 ± 7.11 35.89 ± 7.09 −0.12 ± 2.00 37.33 ± 8.82 36.71 ± 7.08 0.62 ± 5.36 0.69* 0.66 0.96*
Y-axis (°) 72.13 ± 3.83 71.96 ± 5.33 0.17 ± 3.11 72.82 ± 5.63 73.00 ± 4.40 −0.18 ± 2.91 0.78* 0.97* 0.97*
MP-FH (°) 29.87 ± 7.54 30.02 ± 7.68 −0.15 ± 4.21 32.64 ± 9.53 30.77 ± 8.82 1.87 ± 8.16 0.32* 0.73 0.99*
U1-NA (°) 32.29 ± 5.03 15.92 ± 6.25 16.38 ± 5.22 34.76 ± 7.51 14.26 ± 6.12 20.50 ± 7.88 0.25 0.31 0.03
U1-NA (mm) 8.10 ± 1.80 2.50 ± 2.26 5.59 ± 2.28 9.19 ± 2.51 2.47 ± 2.23 6.72 ± 2.41 0.06 0.96* 0.13*
U1R-NA (mm) 4.21 ± 1.59 3.85 ± 1.50 −0.35 ± 1.35 4.14 ± 2.40 3.21 ± 1.90 −0.98 ± 2.01 0.96 0.15 0.16
U1-SN (°) 114.29 ± 5.38 97.44 ± 6.35 16.85 ± 5.23 117.68 ± 8.11 96.66 ± 6.82 21.02 ± 8.62 0.07 0.65 0.04
Maxillary Lip to E-plane (mm) 1.95 ± 2.23 -0.70 ± 2.61 2.02 ± 1.51 2.04 ± 2.64 -0.32 ± 1.68 2.36 ± 2.11 0.88 0.66 0.47

There was no significant difference between two groups in skeletal, dental and soft tissue parameters in pretreatment (T0). More lingual crown inclinations were obtained in Invisalign® group compared to Damon Q group (P ≤ .04) when evaluating angular variations of U1-NA (°) and U1-SN (°). Linear retractions of the maxillary incisors and upper lip positions for both groups showed no significance (P ≥ .13).

*

Independent t test and Mann–Whitney U test were used.