Table 2.
Descriptive statistics of pretreatment (T0), post-treatment (T1) and treatment variations (T0-T1).
| Damon Q | Invisalign® | Significance between | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| T0① | T1② | T0-T1③ | T0④ | T1⑤ | T0-T1⑥ | ①④ | ②⑤ | ③⑥ | |||
| SNA (°) | 82.00 ± 3.64 | 81.49 ± 3.60 | 0.51 ± 0.81 | 82.94 ± 2.88 | 82.39 ± 2.53 | 0.55 ± 2.07 | 0.15* | 0.29 | 0.84* | ||
| SNB (°) | 76.59 ± 3.32 | 76.36 ± 3.37 | 0.23 ± 0.91 | 78.79 ± 4.71 | 77.38 ± 3.26 | 1.41 ± 3.20 | 0.08 | 0.24 | 0.19* | ||
| ANB (°) | 5.41 ± 2.05 | 5.17 ± 1.95 | 0.24 ± 0.84 | 4.91 ± 2.04 | 5.02 ± 1.76 | −0.10 ± 1.87 | 0.97* | 0.76 | 0.33* | ||
| MP-SN (°) | 35.77 ± 7.11 | 35.89 ± 7.09 | −0.12 ± 2.00 | 37.33 ± 8.82 | 36.71 ± 7.08 | 0.62 ± 5.36 | 0.69* | 0.66 | 0.96* | ||
| Y-axis (°) | 72.13 ± 3.83 | 71.96 ± 5.33 | 0.17 ± 3.11 | 72.82 ± 5.63 | 73.00 ± 4.40 | −0.18 ± 2.91 | 0.78* | 0.97* | 0.97* | ||
| MP-FH (°) | 29.87 ± 7.54 | 30.02 ± 7.68 | −0.15 ± 4.21 | 32.64 ± 9.53 | 30.77 ± 8.82 | 1.87 ± 8.16 | 0.32* | 0.73 | 0.99* | ||
| U1-NA (°) | 32.29 ± 5.03 | 15.92 ± 6.25 | 16.38 ± 5.22 | 34.76 ± 7.51 | 14.26 ± 6.12 | 20.50 ± 7.88 | 0.25 | 0.31 | 0.03 | ||
| U1-NA (mm) | 8.10 ± 1.80 | 2.50 ± 2.26 | 5.59 ± 2.28 | 9.19 ± 2.51 | 2.47 ± 2.23 | 6.72 ± 2.41 | 0.06 | 0.96* | 0.13* | ||
| U1R-NA (mm) | 4.21 ± 1.59 | 3.85 ± 1.50 | −0.35 ± 1.35 | 4.14 ± 2.40 | 3.21 ± 1.90 | −0.98 ± 2.01 | 0.96 | 0.15 | 0.16 | ||
| U1-SN (°) | 114.29 ± 5.38 | 97.44 ± 6.35 | 16.85 ± 5.23 | 117.68 ± 8.11 | 96.66 ± 6.82 | 21.02 ± 8.62 | 0.07 | 0.65 | 0.04 | ||
| Maxillary Lip to E-plane (mm) | 1.95 ± 2.23 | -0.70 ± 2.61 | 2.02 ± 1.51 | 2.04 ± 2.64 | -0.32 ± 1.68 | 2.36 ± 2.11 | 0.88 | 0.66 | 0.47 | ||
There was no significant difference between two groups in skeletal, dental and soft tissue parameters in pretreatment (T0). More lingual crown inclinations were obtained in Invisalign® group compared to Damon Q group (P ≤ .04) when evaluating angular variations of U1-NA (°) and U1-SN (°). Linear retractions of the maxillary incisors and upper lip positions for both groups showed no significance (P ≥ .13).
Independent t test and Mann–Whitney U test were used.