Skip to main content
Gut Microbes logoLink to Gut Microbes
. 2022 Oct 2;14(1):2117508. doi: 10.1080/19490976.2022.2117508

The clinical evidence for postbiotics as microbial therapeutics

Alexis Mosca a, Ana Teresa Abreu Y Abreu b, Kok Ann Gwee c, Gianluca Ianiro d, Jan Tack e, Thi Viet Ha Nguyen f, Colin Hill g,
PMCID: PMC9542959  PMID: 36184735

ABSTRACT

An optimally operating microbiome supports protective, metabolic, and immune functions, but disruptions produce metabolites and toxins which can be involved in many conditions. Probiotics have the potential to manage these. However, their use in vulnerable people is linked to possible safety concerns and maintaining their viability is difficult. Interest in postbiotics is therefore increasing. Postbiotics contain inactivated microbial cells or cell components, thus are more stable and exert similar health benefits to probiotics. To review the evidence for the clinical benefits of postbiotics in highly prevalent conditions and consider future potential areas of benefit. There is growing evidence revealing the diverse clinical benefits of postbiotics in many prevalent conditions. Postbiotics could offer a novel therapeutic approach and may be a safer alternative to probiotics. Establishing interaction mechanisms between postbiotics and commensal microorganisms will improve the understanding of potential clinical benefits and may lead to targeted postbiotic therapy.

KEYWORDS: Microbiota, postbiotics, microbial therapeutics, clinical benefits, gastrointestinal disorders, allergy, upper respiratory tract infection, stress, metabolic syndrome

Introduction

The human microbiome is the catalog of all microorganisms inhabiting the human body and their genetic complement.1 When operating optimally, the microbiome plays an important role in human health by supporting protective, metabolic, and immune functions.2 Specifically, the evidence suggests that the relationship between the gut microbiome and intestinal epithelial cells supports mucosal and systemic immunity, neuroendocrine function, and intestinal and extra-intestinal health from infancy to adulthood.3–5 When the microbiome is disrupted, metabolites and toxins are produced and are involved with both intestinal and extraintestinal diseases, including chronic digestive disorders, chronic inflammatory disorders, autoimmunity, allergies, and metabolic syndromes.6,7 Microbiome disruption can also influence disease development in distal organs including the brain, liver, lung, and adipose tissue.7

In recent years, it has been suggested that live microorganisms with bioactive properties (probiotics or live biotherapeutics) have therapeutic potential for various immune, neurological, and physiological pathologies.2,8 However, there have been some concerns about administering live microbial therapeutics to immunocompromised or critically ill individuals, those with intestinal barrier dysfunction, or neonates and young children.9 These concerns include the risk of translocation from the gut into the blood, the risk of acquiring and transferring antibiotic resistance genes and the risk of interfering with normal colonization of neonatal gut microbiota.9,10 Furthermore, live biotherapeutic viability is difficult to maintain and can be unstable at room temperature, shortening shelf-life. These issues have therefore increased the interest in using alternative biotherapeutic products containing inanimate bacteria, microorganism-derived cell components and metabolites which are safer to use in vulnerable populations. These biotherapeutic products are referred to as postbiotics.

Postbiotics are defined as “a preparation of inanimate microorganisms and/or their components that confers a health benefit on the host”11 and are produced from inactivated commensal bacteria. They include inactivated microbial cells, cell-free supernatants, and key components, commonly inactivated by heat. Although inanimate, they exert similar, and sometimes more, health benefits compared with probiotics, a phenomenon that has been referred to as the “probiotic paradox”.12

Their efficacy is thought to be derived from interactions between the host and products generated by the microbiome during microbial growth following alterations caused by the postbiotic. These products include microbial metabolites, proteins, lipids, carbohydrates, vitamins, organic acids, cell wall components or other complex molecules.13,14 It is also possible that active molecules in the postbiotic preparation may pass through the mucus layers and stimulate epithelial cells more directly.9 Furthermore, the loss of viability and cell lysis could potentially produce more complex beneficial effects such as immunomodulation.9

Being inanimate, their efficacy is not dependent on cell viability meaning they can be used in combination with antimicrobials without losing efficacy.10,15 In addition, their inanimate nature means they are less sensitive to environmental conditions resulting in a longer shelf-life and enabling storage and transportation at ambient temperatures.3,10,11,16,17 Postbiotics have the potential to provide novel therapeutic approaches and may pave the way towards increasing the potency of active microorganisms or provide a means to convert them into functional ingredients.18

This paper aims to review the available evidence for the clinical benefits of postbiotics in highly prevalent conditions and consider further potential areas of benefit.

Overview of knowledge about mechanism of action

Postbiotics are a complex preparation containing many bioactive compounds with multiple mechanisms of action. The mechanisms of action by which postbiotics exert their benefit and their role in human health are not clearly understood in most instances. These mechanisms may occur independently or in combination and in some cases could be similar to known probiotic mechanisms of action.11,19,20 Two of the major mechanisms by which postbiotics could potentiate a clinical benefit are immune system modulation and enhancing intestinal barrier function (Figure 1). We will only provide a brief overview of mechanisms of action because they are covered in detail in other publications. 11

Figure 1.

Figure 1.

Postbiotic mechanism of action. Postbiotics could act in many ways, four of which are illustrated here. Postbiotics could enhance barrier function, through the stimulation of tight junctions, or by stimulating mucous production. Postbiotics could also act through changes in the microbiome and could modulate the immune response. Created with BioRender.

Local and systemic immunomodulation generally occurs by stimulating various cytokine and immune modulator expression and microorganism-associated molecular patterns interacting with specific immune cell receptors such as C-type lectins and toll-like receptors (TLR).21 Other immunomodulatory microbial metabolites including histamine, branched chain fatty acids and short-chain fatty acids (SCFA), and cell wall components including peptidoglycans and muramic acid may be contained in postbiotics and can influence various immune responses.22,23

Intestinal barrier function can be enhanced by exopolysaccharides, including those from Bifidobacterium spp.24 Some Bifidobacterium spp. have also been shown to promote tight junction function.25 Furthermore, if present in sufficient amounts, SCFAs can potentially modify barrier function and protect against lipopolysaccharide-induced disruption.26 Additionally, postbiotics may modulate the intestinal microbiome itself. For example, lactic acid and bacteriocins can have a direct antimicrobial effect,27,28 while indirect microbiome modulation can occur through mechanisms such as carrying lactic acid that is consumed by microbiome microorganisms resulting in SCFAs and butyrate production which both have beneficial roles.29

Postbiotic preparations could also antagonize intestinal pathogens by delivering antimicrobial compounds (metabolites and bacteriocins) that may prevent biofilm formation and inactivate specific microorganisms.11,30

Overview of clinical benefit evidence organized by mechanism of action

Enhancing intestinal barrier function (Table 1)

Table 1.

Clinical evidence for postbiotics as microbial therapeutics through intestinal barrier function enhancement.

Study design Condition Population Postbiotic Results
Evidence of efficacy in gastrointestinal disorders
Randomized, placebo-controlled trial 39 Acute watery rotavirus diarrhea 73 children aged 3 to 24 months. Inactivated Lactobacillus LB plus fermented culture medium Significantly shorter duration of diarrhea compared with placebo.
Fewer rotavirus positive children had watery stools after 24 hours in the Lactobacillus group.
Randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial40 Non-rotavirus diarrhea Hospitalized infants aged 1–24 months Inactivated Lactobacillus LB plus fermented culture medium Lactobacillus LB significantly shortened diarrhea duration by 1 d (treatment group = 39.5 h ± 10.5, placebo group = 63.4 h ± 14.9, p = <0.01).
Randomized, double-blind, controlled trial41 Acute watery diarrhea 80 children aged between 3 months and 4 y Inactivated Lactobacillus LB plus fermented culture medium 40% reduction in diarrheal illness duration in the treatment group.
Diarrhea duration was significantly reduced in children who had had diarrhea for longer than 24 hours at inclusion (p = 0.044).
Prospective, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial 42 Prevention of diarrhea 377 children aged 12–48 months Cow’s milk fermented with heat-treated Lactobacillus paracasei The proportion of participants experiencing at least one episode of diarrhea was significantly lower in children receiving cow’s milk fermented with Lactobacillus paracasei compared with the placebo (p < 0.0001).
Multicenter, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial 43 Prevention of diarrhea 126 children aged 12–48 months Cow’s milk fermented with heat-treated Lactobacillus paracasei The proportion of children presenting ≥1 episode of acute gastroenteritis was significantly lower in children receiving L. paracasei (p < 0.05) compared with the placebo. They were also 22% less likely than children in the placebo group to experience and episode of diarrhea (p < 0.01).
Exploratory study 44 Antibiotic associated diarrhea 184 adults (96 on antibiotics + postbiotic and 88 on antibiotics alone) Inactivated Lactobacillus LB plus fermented culture medium Less diarrhea in the Lactobacillus LB group
(antibiotic only: RR = 1.36, 95% CI 1.07–1.72; antibiotic + Lactobacillus: RR = 1.16, 95% CI 0.89–1.51, p = 0.046)
Randomized, controlled trial 48 Chronic diarrhea 137 adult patients Inactivated Lactobacillus LB plus fermented culture medium At the 2nd and 4th week, mean bowel frequency was significantly lower in the Lactobacillus LB group.
At the end of treatment, clinical symptoms were markedly improved in the Lactobacillus LB group.
Randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial 49 Irritable Bowel Syndrome 443 patients with IBS Bifidobacterium bifidum MIMBb75 B. bifidum substantially alleviates IBS and its symptoms compared with the placebo group (risk ratio 1.7, 95% CI 1.3–2.4; p = 0 · 0007).
Functional assessment 50 Irritable Bowel Syndrome 297 patients with IBS Inactivated Lactobacillus LB plus fermented culture medium The average number of stools per week decreased from
17.59 ± 0.6 to 12.83 ± 0.61 after treatment (p < 0.0001). The abdominal pain score on a scale from 1–10 decreased from 4.47 ± 0.15 before treatment to 2.79 ± 0.14 after treatment (p < 0.0001). The bloating score
decreased from 4.49 ± 0.18 to 2.56 ± 0.15 (p < 0.0001). The HRQOL score, which is inversely correlated
with quality of life, decreased from 5.99 ± 0.14 to 3.92 ±
0.16 (p < 0.0001).
Single center, open-label, prospective, randomized trial52 Helicobacter pylori infection 120 H. pylori positive, dyspeptic volunteers Heat stabilized Lactobacillus acidophilus LB In the standard treatment group, eradication was successful in 42 of the 58 patients (72%). In the standard treatment plus L. acidophilus LB group, the eradication rate increased significantly to 88% (52 of 59 patients) (p = 0.03).

Evidence of efficacy in gastrointestinal disorders

Pediatric population

Acute diarrhea is a significant cause of childhood morbidity and mortality in developing countries31 and rotavirus is the most common pathogen causing 29% to 45% of severe diarrhea cases.32 Acute gastroenteritis has been found to cause large-scale alterations of the intestinal microbiome.33 Enteric bacterial infections markedly reduce the intestinal microbiome richness and diversity which can last up to 14 weeks post-infection.34 Similar changes are observed with viral diarrhea.35 Microbiome alterations are more significant in children with a “failure to thrive” and these children also take longer to recover from diarrheal illness.36 Postbiotics may help to mitigate these alterations and preserve a balanced microbiome during and after diarrheal illnesses. Although live Lactobacillus has been shown to be effective against viral diarrhea,37,38 studies have also demonstrated that heat-treated Lactobacillus LB can promote faster recovery, reduce morbidity and reduce hospitalization duration.39–41 Furthermore, well-controlled studies have shown that heat-treated Lactobacillus paracasei helps prevent diarrhea by significantly reducing the number of diarrhea episodes compared with a placebo.42,43

Antibiotics can also alter the intestinal microbiome leading to antibiotic-associated diarrhea. Although, probiotic efficacy is widely documented with diarrhea and has been suggested to treat antibiotic-associated diarrhea, there is a perception that antibiotics may reduce probiotic viability.44 Postbiotics may reduce the risk of antibiotic-associated diarrhea as shown by an exploratory study revealing that in patients receiving antibiotics, there was less diarrhea in the heat-treated Lactobacillus LB group.44

Adult population

Chronic diarrhea is commonly caused by chronic functional diarrhea and chronic parasitic and bacterial infections in developing countries45 while in developed countries, irritable bowel syndrome (IBS) is the most common cause affecting up to 15% of adults.46,47 Treatment often includes antibiotics and antimotility drugs, but they can be ineffective and cause adverse effects. Postbiotics could be a possible alternative. A recent randomized-controlled study showed that heat-treated Lactobacillus LB significantly improved chronic diarrhea and clinical symptoms compared with live lactobacilli (p < 0.05).48 Non-viable Bifidobacterium bifidum MIMBb75 has been found to substantially alleviate IBS and its symptoms compared with the placebo (p = 0 · 0007).49 Similarly, inactivated Lactobacillus LB plus fermented culture medium significantly decreased the number of weekly stools (p < 0.0001) and improved abdominal pain, bloating and quality of life in patients with IBS (p < 0.0001).50

Postbiotics may also help improve the efficacy of standard treatment for Helicobacter pylori infections. Lactobacilli has been shown to inhibit the attachment of Helicobacter pylori to gastric epithelial cells in in vitro studies.51 Furthermore, L. acidophilus LB spent culture supernatant decreases H. pylori viability, regardless of pH and lactic acid levels, in vitro and in vivo.51 Heat stabilized L. acidophilus LB was given to in addition to the standard treatment to H. pylori positive patients in an open-label, prospective, randomized trial. It was demonstrated that adding L. acidophilus to the standard treatment significantly increases eradication rates compared to standard treatment alone.52

Immune system modulation (Table 2)

Table 2.

Clinical evidence for postbiotics as microbial therapeutics through immune system modulation.

Study design Condition Population Postbiotic Results
Evidence of efficacy in immunity and allergies
Randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, parallel study 57 Examining influence on immune function and quality of life (QoL) 60 healthy adults Heat-killed Lactobacillus plantarum L-137 Compared with a placebo, the change in Con A-induced proliferation and Th1:Th2 ratio were greater in the HK-LP group (p = 0.036 and p = 0.002, respectively). QoL improved more in the HK-LP group than innthe control group (p = 0.049 at week 8, p = 0.092 at week 12)
Randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial 59 Perennial allergic rhinitis 90 subjects (adults and children) Heat-killed Lactobacillus paracasei LP33 After 30 d of treatment, quality of life improved more for subjects taking live or heat-killed LP33 in terms of frequency (9.47 ± 2.89, 6.30 ± 2.19, vs. −3.47 ± 1.53, respectively; p < 0.0001) and level of bother (5.91 ± 3.21, 6.04 ± 2.44, vs. −2.80 ± 1.64, respectively; p = 0.004) compared with the placebo group. HK-LP33 efficacy was not inferior to the live variant.
Ex vivo cellular study60 Grass pollen allergy Peripheral blood mononuclear cells from 10 adults with grass pollen allergy and 19 non-allergic adults Inactivated Lactobacillus LB and non-pathogenic Escherichia coli CD69 expression on T-lymphocytes was significantly up-regulated by both bacteria (p = 0.001). Allergen stimulation caused significantly increased CD23 expression (p = 0.008) which reduced after Lactobacillus stimulation and significantly reduced with allergen plus E. coli (p = 0.029). Lactobacillus stimulation reduced CD80 expression in the allergic group only (p = 0.021). CD86 expression increased significantly after Lactobacillus stimulation (p = 0.049) and distinctly increased after E. coli in both groups (p = 0.001). Both bacteria modulate allergic immune response through co-stimulatory molecule expression and CD23 alteration. There is clear promotion of T-helper-1 dominated response in allergic participants.
Evidence of efficacy in upper respiratory tract infections
Randomized, single-blind, placebo-controlled study 63 Examining the effect of HK L-137 on interferon-β 16 healthy female adults Heat-killed Lactobacillus plantarum L-137 Interferon-β levels were significantly higher in the HK L-137 group before trivalent influenza vaccination compared with the control group. Vaccination resulted in little additional induction of Interferon-β. Increased type 1 interferon augments host defense against influenza A virus.
Randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, parallel study 65 Upper respiratory tract infections 78 healthy subjects with high psychological stress levels Heat-killed Lactobacillus plantarum L-137 Compared with the control group, URTI incidence was significantly lower in the HK L-137 group (p = 0.011). Significant negative correlation between HK L-137 intake duration and URTI incidence, duration, severity, and medication duration. Concanavalin A-induced proliferation of peripheral blood mononuclear cells was significantly greater in the HK L-137 group compared with the control group (p = 0.048).
Prospective, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial 42 Common infectious diseases 377 children aged 12–48 months Cow’s milk (Group A) or rice (Group B) fermented with Lactobacillus paracasei CBA L74 There number of children having at least one common infectious disease was lower in group A (48.2%) and group B (58.5%) than in the placebo group (80.3%). Upper respiratory tract infection incidence was lower in group A (48.2%) and group B (58.5%) compared with the placebo group (70.5%).
Multicenter, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial 43 Common infectious diseases 126 children aged 12–48 months Cow’s milk fermented with Lactobacillus paracasei CBA L74 60% of children in L74 group presented at least one common infectious disease compared with 83% in the placebo group. Numbers of children presenting at least one URTI was significantly lower in the L74 group compared with the placebo (51% vs. 74%, p < 0.05)
Randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study 66 Viral respiratory tract infections 172 children aged 3 to 6 y Heat-killed Pediococcus acidilactici K15 Salivary IgA levels were maintained significantly higher in the K15 group compared with the placebo. K15 significantly decreased fever duration in children with little intake of fermented food.
Randomized, placebo-controlled, double blind trial 70 Influence on levels of salivary secretory IgA 80 elderly participants Heat-killed Lactobacillus pentosus b240 Mean salivary SIgA rate increased steadily until week 4 with a 20% increase compared to week 0. It stayed relatively stable until week 12. The increase in SIgA rate was significantly greater in the b240 group compared with the placebo group.
Randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial 71 Common cold 280 elderly adults Heat-killed Lactobacillus pentosus b240 The common cold incidence rate was 47.3% for the placebo group, 34.8% for the low-dose group and 29.0% for the high dose group (P for trend = 0.012). Quality of life increased dose-dependently.

Evidence of efficacy in immunity and allergies

Live Lactobacillus spp. have been shown to improve immune function and health-related quality of life (HRQoL), and control allergies. This may be due to its ability to skew the immune system away from T helper 2 (Th2) responses towards T helper 1 (Th1) responses.53 This may be beneficial in Westernized societies where good public hygiene and fewer infections reduce this response, increasing the risk of developing allergies.54 Poor immunity also increases the risk of pathogenic infections and can reduce HRQoL.55,56

There is also well-controlled clinical evidence demonstrating that heat-treated Lactobacilli plantarum (HK-LP) may also improve Th-1 related immune function. Compared with a placebo, the change in Con A-induced proliferation and Th1:Th2 ratio was greater (p = 0.036 and p = 0.002, respectively) and HRQoL improved more in the HK-LP group (p = 0.049 at week 8, p = 0.092 at week 12).58

Similarly, live Lactobacillus paracasei 33 (LP33) has been shown to effectively and safely improve QoL for patients with house-dust mite induced perennial allergic rhinitis.59 A subsequent randomized-controlled trial revealed that heat-treated LP33 had similar efficacy to the live variant since patients taking either the live or heat-treated LP33 had improved QoL scores for frequency (p < 0.0001) and level of bother (p = 0.004) compared with the placebo.60 Furthermore, inactivated Lactobacillus LB and non-pathogenic E. coli have been shown to modulate allergic immune response in grass pollen allergies, both clearly through Th1-dominated responses.61

Allergic rhinitis requires long-term management so the efficacy, safety, low cost, and ease of storage may mean that postbiotics are a good treatment option. It has also been suggested that postbiotics could potentially improve food allergies.62

Evidence of efficacy in upper respiratory tract infections

Animal and clinical data support the use of three postbiotic strains (Lactobacillus plantarum, Pediococcus acidilactici, and Lactobacillus pentosus) in preventing upper respiratory tract infections (URTI).

In mice, heat-treated Lactobacillus plantarum L-137 has been shown to stimulate type 1 interferon production thus enhancing protection against the influenza virus63 which has also been observed in humans.64 It has been suggested that high levels of psychological stress increase the risk of acute respiratory illness.65 Well-controlled clinical evidence suggests daily heat-treated Lactobacillus plantarum L-137 (HK L-137) intake can decrease URTI incidence in healthy people with high levels of psychological stress, possibly through immune function augmentation. The 12-week randomized-controlled study found URTI incidence was significantly lower in the HK L-137 group vs the control group (p = 0.011). There was also a significant negative correlation between HK L-137 intake duration and URTI incidence, duration, severity, and medication duration. The concanavalin A-induced proliferation of peripheral blood mononuclear cells was significantly greater in the HK L-137 group than in the control group (p = 0.048).66 This means HK L-137 intake could potentially reduce this URTI risk.

Similarly, studies have evaluated the possibility of preventing respiratory tract infections in children. Lactobacillus paracasei CBA L74 was found to reduce the number of cases of pharyngitis, laryngitis and tracheitis in two well-controlled trials including children aged 12–48 months.42,43 Furthermore, Pediococcus acidilactici K15 was found to support anti-infectious immune systems in children who ate less fermented foods and maintained salivary secretory IgA levels in all subjects in a randomized-controlled study focusing on respiratory tract infection prevention in pre-school children. The four-month study also found that in children eating little fermented food, K15 significantly reduced fever duration compared with the placebo.67

Salivary IgA levels decrease with age68–70 suggesting that elderly adults may be more susceptible to upper respiratory tract infections. Lactobacillus pentosus b240 has been shown to increase salivary IgA levels71 and a well-controlled trial demonstrated that b240 intake significantly reduces common cold incidence rates in elderly adults, possibly improving infection resistance through mucosal immunity. This study found that common cold incidence rates were lower (log-rank test, p = 0.034) and general health perceptions, determined using SF-36 w, dose-dependently increased (p for trend = 0.016).72

Multiple mechanisms of action (Table 3)

Table 3.

Clinical evidence for postbiotics as microbial therapeutics through multiple mechanisms of action.

Study design Condition Population Postbiotic Results
Evidence for efficacy in stress and neurological conditions
Randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study 82 Stress 60 medical students preparing for national examinations Heat-inactivated Lactobacillus gasseri CP2305 Anxiety and sleep disturbance were significantly reduced in the CP2305 group compared with the placebo group. CP2305 also significantly shortened sleep latency and wake time after sleep onset. Salivary chromogranin A levels were also significantly lowered in the CP2305 group compared with placebo. CP2305 was also found to attenuate stress-induced decline of Bifidobacterium spp. and elevation of Streptococcus spp.
Multicenter, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial 84 Mild Alzheimer’s Disease 328 patients aged 60 to 85 y with mild Alzheimer’s Disease Plasmalogens The Wechsler Memory Scale-Revised improved significantly in the treatment group. In a subgroup analysis, this scale also improved significantly in females and participants under 77 y of age. The between group difference for females was statistically significant (p = 0.017), as it was for those under 77 y of age (p = 0.029). Plasma plasmalogen decreased significantly more in the placebo group compared with the treatment group.
Evidence for efficacy in metabolic syndrome
Randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled pilot study 99 Obesity-related disorders 32 overweight/obese adults with insulin resistance Pasteurized Akkermansia muciniphila Insulinemia (−34.08 ± 7.12%, P = 0.006), plasma total cholesterol (−8.68 ± 2.38%, P = 0.02) and body weight (−2.27 ± 0.92 kg, P = 0.091) were reduced and insulin sensitivity improved (+28.62 ± 7.02%, P = 0.002) in the pasteurized A. muciniphila group compared with placebo. Compared with the baseline, fat mass (−1.37 ± 0.82 kg, P = 0.092) and hip circumference (−2.63 ± 1.14 cm, P = 0.091) decreased in the pasteurized A. muciniphila group.

Evidence for efficacy in stress and neurological conditions

The gut-brain axis has been shown to have a crucial role in maintaining intestinal homeostasis and brain function.73,74 The intestinal microbiome affects communication between the intestines and the brain through immune, endocrine and neural pathways,75 and evidence suggests that it significantly impacts brain function affecting mood, recognition and behavior.76

Probiotics have been shown to modulate hippocampus-mediated negative feedback regulation of the hypothalamic–pituitary–adrenal axis, mitigate stress-induced pain and behavior,77,78 transduce signals to the brain via the afferent vagal nerve and relieve mood disturbances.79,80 Research is underway to investigate the effects of heat-treated bacteria.

Well-controlled clinical results show that long-term Lactobacillus gasseri CP2305 use may improve the mental state, sleep quality and gut microbiome of healthy adults under stressful conditions. The 24-week randomized-controlled study included students preparing for national medical examinations and daily CP2305 significantly reduced anxiety, sleep disturbance and salivary chromogranin A levels compared with the placebo (p < 0.05). CP2305 also attenuated the stress-induced decline of Bifidobacterium spp. and the stress-induced elevation of Streptococcus spp.81

Postbiotics have uses in other nervous system-related conditions. For example, it has been demonstrated in mice that daily intake of plasmalogens, a component of postbiotics, can inhibit memory loss by inhibiting glial activation.82 Furthermore, a well-controlled study revealed that plasmalogen may improve cognitive function in patients with mild Alzheimer’s disease.83

Potential uses include new anti-depressant approaches since depression has been linked with intestinal microbiome alterations.84,85 Furthermore, multiple sclerosis pathogenesis has also been linked with microbiome alterations86 including lower levels of SCFA-producing bacteria87 which could be a potential target for postbiotics.

Efficacy in cardiac and vascular disorders

Oxidative damage can lead to inflammation and cardiovascular disease. Molecules with antioxidant properties found in postbiotic preparations could therefore potentially reduce this.88 Inflammation and endothelial dysfunction occurring with chronic kidney disease (CKD) may cause cardiac damage; however, postbiotic preparations have been identified as a potential prophylaxis for CKD-associated cardiac damage.89 Further data suggest that bacterial metabolites and components may prevent or slow the progression of CKD and hypertension.89

Evidence for efficacy in metabolic syndrome

Metabolic syndrome is characterized by various comorbidities predisposing individuals to cardiovascular pathologies and type 2 diabetes mellitus.90 Obesity-related disorder onset can be linked to the intestinal microbiome.91 Modulating the intestinal microbiome with postbiotics has been shown to facilitate weight reduction92 and may reduce cholesterol, as demonstrated in one study where B. longum administered to rats had a cholesterol-lowering effect.93 Moreover, muramyl dipeptide, a bacterial wall component, can modulate GLP-1 secretion thereby increasing insulin sensitivity and improving glucose tolerance.94

In rodents, live Akkermansia muciniphila reduced obesity, glucose intolerance, insulin resistance, steatosis, and gut permeability.95–97 Subsequently, it was discovered that pasteurization enhances its effect on adiposity, insulin resistance and glucose tolerance.96 Clinical data from a randomized-controlled study including overweight/obese, insulin-resistant individuals show that pasteurized A. muciniphila reduces liver dysfunction and inflammation blood marker levels while leaving the overall gut microbiome structure unaffected. The three-month study found that pasteurized A. muciniphila was safe and well tolerated, improved insulin sensitivity (p = 0.002), and reduced insulinemia (p = 0.006), plasma total cholesterol (p = 0.02) and body weight (p = 0.091) compared with the placebo. It also reduced fat mass (p = 0.092) and hip circumference (p = 0.091) compared with baseline.98

Similarly, the intestinal microbiome has been shown to also influence appetite,99 meaning postbiotics could potentially be used as an appetite regulator.

Future potential

There are areas where postbiotics have potential efficacy, for example the liver. The gut–liver axis is a bidirectional relationship between the gut, its microbiome, and the liver. The portal vein carries gut-derived products to the liver and the liver feedbacks via bile and antibody secretion into the intestine. A healthy microbiome maintains gut-liver axis homeostasis. Liver cirrhosis is associated with a profoundly altered microbiome and damaged intestinal barrier. There is increasing evidence that microorganism-derived metabolites including trimethylamine, SCFAs and ethanol have a pathogenic role in non-alcoholic fatty liver disease. Postbiotics are considered a potential new therapeutic avenue for these liver diseases, but more research is needed to confirm their benefit.100

Probiotic genome editing already exists101 and could potentially be used with postbiotics to modify the precursor bacteria, thus generating new postbiotic interventions. Furthermore, advancements in microbiome metagenomic mapping can further elucidate interactions between commensal microorganisms and the intestine as well as strengthen the evidence for postbiotics. This could even be extended to individualized microbiome phenotyping to prevent disease, though this is a long way off.

Establishing the interaction mechanisms between postbiotics and commensal microorganisms will improve the understanding of the potential clinical benefits and possibly lead to targeted postbiotic therapy.

Conclusion

Postbiotics are safe and stable with a long shelf-life enabling easy storage and transportation and can be administered during antibiotic treatment without affecting efficacy, making them an appealing alternative to probiotics. There is growing evidence for the clinical benefits of postbiotics in the management of highly prevalent conditions including gastrointestinal, dermatological, and neurological disorders as well as respiratory infections and metabolic syndrome. Postbiotics may offer a novel therapeutic approach for these conditions and could be a safer alternative to probiotics, particularly in vulnerable populations such as pediatrics. Additional randomized, placebo-controlled clinical trials are necessary to further verify the clinical benefits of postbiotics.

Acknowledgments

The authors thank Charlotte Wright BVM&S MRCVS DipTrans for providing medical writing support in the drafting and writing of the manuscript and Amy Whereat BSc Physiology & Pharmacology MMktg MGSM for editorial support, both from Speak the Speech Consulting.

Funding Statement

This expert review was sponsored by an independent grant from ADARE.

Disclosure statement

All authors are on the ADARE advisory board. AM is involved with PileJe, Biogaia, Danone, Havea, and Biocodex. ATA consults for Carnot Mexico, Médix Mexico, Sanofi México and Latin America, Alfasigma Mexico. ATA is a speaker for Alfasigma Mexico and Italy, Sanofi Global, Menarini Mexico, Médix Mexico, Takeda Mexico, Carnot Mexico, Adare France, Columbia Mexico, Abbott México and Latin America, Sanofi Mexico, Latin America and Global, ABiotics Spain, Axon Pharma Chili, Mayoli Spindler, Mexico and France, Biocodex Mexico and France, Tecnoquímicas Colombia, MD Pharma Colombia, Medix – Healthcare – Instituto Rosell Mexico, Menarini, Mexico, Ferrer Mexico, Takeda, Mexico, and Latin America, Columbia, Mexico, FAES FARMA Mexico, Ecuador, Falk Institute Mexico, Instituto de Nutrición y Salud Kellogg´s, Instituto Danone Mexico. JT has given has given scientific advice to AlfaWassermann, Arena, Bayer, Christian Hansen, Clasado, Danone, Devintec, Falk, FitForMe, Grünenthal, Ironwood, Janssen, Kiowa Kirin, Menarini, Mylan, Neurogastrx, Neutec, Novartis, Nutricia, Reckitt Benckiser, Ricordati, Shionogi, Takeda, Truvion, Tsumura, Zealand and Zeria pharmaceuticals, has received research support from Biohit, Shire, Sofar and Takeda, and has served on the Speaker bureau for Abbott, Allergan, AstraZeneca, FitForMe, Janssen, Kyowa Kirin, Mayoly, Menarini, Mylan, Novartis, Schwabe Pharmaceuticals, Takeda, Wellspect and Zeria. JT is funded by a Methusalem grant from Leuven University. TVHN has been on expert panels for expert panels organized by Friesland Campina, Sanofi, AstraZeneca, Abbott, and Nestle. CH conducts research funded by ADARE Biome.

Data availability statement

Data sharing is not applicable to this article as no new data were created or analyzed in this study.

References

  • 1.Ursell LK, Metcalf JL, Parfrey LW, Knight R.. Defining the human microbiome. Nutr Rev. 2012;70(Suppl 1):S38–14. doi: 10.1111/j.1753-4887.2012.00493.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Belkaid Y, Harrison OJ. Homeostatic immunity and the microbiota. Immunity. 2017;46(4):562–576. doi: 10.1016/j.immuni.2017.04.008. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Kataria J, Li N, Wynn JL, Neu J. Probiotic microbes: do they need to be alive to be beneficial? Nutr Rev. 2009;67(9):546–550. doi: 10.1111/j.1753-4887.2009.00226.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Neu J, Douglas-Escobar M, Lopez M. Microbes and the developing gastrointestinal tract. Nutr Clin Pract. 2007;22(2):174–182. doi: 10.1177/0115426507022002174. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Huffnagle GB. Gi microbiota and regulation of the immune system. New York: Springer-Verlag New York. Advances in experimental medicine and biology [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Gareau MG, Sherman PM, Walker WA. Probiotics and the gut microbiota in intestinal health and disease. Nat Rev Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2010;7(9):503–514. doi: 10.1038/nrgastro.2010.117. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Levy M, Kolodziejczyk AA, Thaiss CA, Elinav E. Dysbiosis and the immune system. Nat Rev Immunol. 2017;17(4):219–232. doi: 10.1038/nri.2017.7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Peluzio M, Martinez JA, Milagro FI. Postbiotics: metabolites and mechanisms involved in microbiota-host interactions. Trends Food Sci Technol. 2021;108(11):11–26. doi: 10.1016/j.tifs.2020.12.004. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Piqué N, Berlanga M, Miñana-Galbis D. Health benefits of heat-killed (tyndallized) probiotics: an overview. Int J Mol Sci. 2019;20(10):2534. doi: 10.3390/ijms20102534. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Warda AK, de Almeida Bettio PH, Hueston CM, Di Benedetto G, Clooney AG, Hill C. Oral administration of heat-treated lactobacilli modifies the murine microbiome and reduces citrobacter induced colitis. Front Microbiol. 2020;11(69). doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2020.00069. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Salminen S, Collado MC, Endo A, Hill C, Lebeer S, Quigley EMM, Sanders ME, Shamir R, Swann JR, Szajewska H, et al. The international scientific association of probiotics and prebiotics (isapp) consensus statement on the definition and scope of postbiotics. Nat Rev Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2021. doi: 10.1038/s41575-021-00440-6. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Adams CA. The probiotic paradox: live and dead cells are biological response modifiers. Nutr Res Rev. 2010;23(1):37–46. doi: 10.1017/s0954422410000090. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Konstantinov SR, Kuipers EJ, Peppelenbosch MP. Functional genomic analyses of the gut microbiota for CRC screening. Nat Rev Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2013;10(12):741–745. doi: 10.1038/nrgastro.2013.178. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Aguilar-Toalá JE, Garcia-Varela R, Garcia HS, Mata-Haro V, González-Córdova AF, Vallejo-Cordoba B, Hernández-Mendoza A. Postbiotics: an evolving term within the functional foods field. Trends Food Sci Technol. 2018;75(105):105–114. doi: 10.1016/j.tifs.2018.03.009. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Warda AK, Clooney AG, Ryan F, de Almeida Bettio PH, Di Benedetto G, Ross RP, Hill C. A postbiotic consisting of heat-treated lactobacilli has a bifidogenic effect in pure culture and in human fermented faecal communities. Appl Environ Microbiol. 2021;87(8). doi: 10.1128/aem.02459-20. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Deshpande G, Athalye-Jape G, Patole S. Para-probiotics for preterm neonates-the next frontier. Nutrients. 2018;10(7):871. doi: 10.3390/nu10070871. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Wegh CAM, Geerlings SY, Knol J, Roeselers G, Belzer C. Postbiotics and their potential applications in early life nutrition and beyond. Int J Mol Sci. 2019;20(19):4673. doi: 10.3390/ijms20194673. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Ouwehand AC, Tölkkö S, Kulmala J, Salminen S, Salminen E. Adhesion of inactivated probiotic strains to intestinal mucus. Lett Appl Microbiol. 2000;31(1):82–86. doi: 10.1046/j.1472-765x.2000.00773.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Hill C, Guarner F, Reid G, Gibson GR, Merenstein DJ, Pot B, Morelli L, Canani RB, Flint HJ, Salminen S, et al. Expert consensus document. The international scientific association for probiotics and prebiotics consensus statement on the scope and appropriate use of the term probiotic. Nat Rev Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2014;11(8):506–514. doi: 10.1038/nrgastro.2014.66. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Lebeer S, Bron PA, Marco ML, Van Pijkeren JP, Motherway OM, Hill C, Pot B, Roos S, Klaenhammer T. Identification of probiotic effector molecules: present state and future perspectives. Curr Opin Biotechnol. 2018;49(217):217–223. doi: 10.1016/j.copbio.2017.10.007. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Lebeer S, Vanderleyden J, De Keersmaecker SC. Host interactions of probiotic bacterial surface molecules: comparison with commensals and pathogens. Nat Rev Microbiol. 2010;8(3):171–184. doi: 10.1038/nrmicro2297. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Thomas CM, Hong T, van Pijkeren JP, Hemarajata P, Trinh DV, Hu W, Britton RA, Kalkum M, Versalovic J. Histamine derived from probiotic lactobacillus reuteri suppresses tnf via modulation of PK and Erk signaling. PLoS One. 2012;7(2):e31951. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0031951. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Thangaraju M, Cresci GA, Liu K, Ananth S, Gnanaprakasam JP, Browning DD, Mellinger JD, Smith SB, Digby GJ, Lambert NA, et al. Gpr109a is a g-protein-coupled receptor for the bacterial fermentation product butyrate and functions as a tumor suppressor in colon. Cancer Res. 2009;69(7):2826–2832. doi: 10.1158/0008-5472.Can-08-4466. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Schiavi E, Gleinser M, Molloy E, Groeger D, Frei R, Ferstl R, Rodriguez-Perez N, Ziegler M, Grant R, Moriarty TF, et al. The surface-associated exopolysaccharide of bifidobacterium longum 35624 plays an essential role in dampening host proinflammatory responses and repressing local th17 responses. Appl Environ Microbiol. 2016;82(24):7185–7196. doi: 10.1128/aem.02238-16. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Engevik MA, Luk B, Chang-Graham AL, Hall A, Herrmann B, Ruan W, Endres BT, Shi Z, Garey KW, Hyser JM, et al. Bifidobacterium dentium fortifies the intestinal mucus layer via autophagy and calcium signaling pathways. mBio. 2019;10(3). doi: 10.1128/mBio.01087-19 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Feng Y, Wang Y, Wang P, Huang Y, Wang F. Short-chain fatty acids manifest stimulative and protective effects on intestinal barrier function through the inhibition of nlrp3 inflammasome and autophagy. Cell Physiol Biochem. 2018;49(1):190–205. doi: 10.1159/000492853. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Sun Z, Harris HM, McCann A, Guo C, Argimón S, Zhang W, Yang X, Jeffery IB, Cooney JC, Kagawa TF, et al. Expanding the biotechnology potential of lactobacilli through comparative genomics of 213 strains and associated genera. Nat Commun. 2015;6(1). doi: 10.1038/ncomms9322 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Corr SC, Li Y, Riedel CU, O’Toole PW, Hill C, Gahan CG. Bacteriocin production as a mechanism for the antiinfective activity of lactobacillus salivarius ucc118. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2007;104(18):7617–7621. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0700440104. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Laverde Gomez JA, Mukhopadhya I, Duncan SH, Louis P, Shaw S, Collie-Duguid E, Crost E, Juge N, Flint HJ. Formate cross-feeding and cooperative metabolic interactions revealed by transcriptomics in co-cultures of acetogenic and amylolytic human colonic bacteria. Environ Microbiol. 2019;21(1):259–271. doi: 10.1111/1462-2920.14454. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Hernández-Granados MJ, Franco-Robles E. Postbiotics in human health: possible new functional ingredients? Food Res Int. 2020;137(109660):109660. doi: 10.1016/j.foodres.2020.109660. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Kosek M, Bern C, Guerrant RL. The global burden of diarrhoeal disease, as estimated from studies published between 1992 and 2000. Bull World Health Organ. 2003;81:197–204. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Parashar UD, Gibson CJ, Bresee JS, Glass RI. Rotavirus and severe childhood diarrhea. Emerg Infect Dis. 2006;12(2):304–306. doi: 10.3201/eid1202.050006. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Pop M, Walker AW, Paulson J, Lindsay B, Antonio M, Hossain MA, Oundo J, Tamboura B, Mai V, Astrovskaya I, et al. Diarrhea in young children from low-income countries leads to large-scale alterations in intestinal microbiota composition. Genome Biol. 2014;15(6):R76. doi: 10.1186/gb-2014-15-6-r76. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Singh P, Teal TK, Marsh TL, Tiedje JM, Mosci R, Jernigan K, Zell A, Newton DW, Salimnia H, Lephart P, et al. Intestinal microbial communities associated with acute enteric infections and disease recovery. Microbiome. 2015;3(1). doi: 10.1186/s40168-015-0109-2 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Ma C, Wu X, Nawaz M, Li J, Yu P, Moore JE, Xu J. Molecular characterization of fecal microbiota in patients with viral diarrhea. Curr Microbiol. 2011;63(3):259–266. doi: 10.1007/s00284-011-9972-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Rouhani S, Griffin NW, Yori PP, Gehrig JL, Olortegui MP, Salas MS, Trigoso DR, Moulton LH, Houpt ER, Barratt MJ, et al. Diarrhea as a potential cause and consequence of reduced gut microbial diversity among undernourished children in Peru. Clin Infect Dis. 2020;71(4):989–999. doi: 10.1093/cid/ciz905. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Van Niel CW, Feudtner C, Garrison MM, Christakis DA. Lactobacillus therapy for acute infectious diarrhea in children: a meta-analysis. Pediatrics. 2002;109(4):678–684. doi: 10.1542/peds.109.4.678. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Collinson S, Deans A, Padua-Zamora A, Gregorio GV, Li C, Dans LF, Allen SJ. Probiotics for treating acute infectious diarrhoea. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2020;12(12):Cd003048. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD003048.pub4. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39.Simakachorn N, Pichaipat V, Rithipornpaisarn P, Kongkaew C, Tongpradit P, Varavithya W. Clinical evaluation of the addition of lyophilized, heat-killed lactobacillus acidophilus lb to oral rehydration therapy in the treatment of acute diarrhea in children. J Pediatr Gastroenterol Nutr. 2000;30(1):68–72. doi: 10.1097/00005176-200001000-00020. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40.Liévin-Le Moal V, Sarrazin-Davila LE, Servin AL. An experimental study and a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled clinical trial to evaluate the antisecretory activity of lactobacillus acidophilus strain lb against nonrotavirus diarrhea. Pediatrics. 2007;120(4):e795–803. doi: 10.1542/peds.2006-2930. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 41.Salazar-Lindo E, Figueroa-Quintanilla D, Caciano MI, Reto-Valiente V, Chauviere G, Colin P. Effectiveness and safety of lactobacillus lb in the treatment of mild acute diarrhea in children. J Pediatr Gastroenterol Nutr. 2007;44(5):571–576. doi: 10.1097/MPG.0b013e3180375594. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 42.Nocerino R, Paparo L, Terrin G, Pezzella V, Amoroso A, Cosenza L, Cecere G, De Marco G, Micillo M, Albano F, et al. Cow’s milk and rice fermented with lactobacillus paracasei cba l74 prevent infectious diseases in children: a randomized controlled trial. Clin Nutr. 2017;36(1):118–125. doi: 10.1016/j.clnu.2015.12.004. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 43.Corsello G, Carta M, Marinello R, Picca M, De Marco G, Micillo M, Ferrara D, Vigneri P, Cecere G, Ferri P, et al. Preventive effect of cow’s milk fermented with lactobacillus paracasei cba l74 on common infectious diseases in children: a multicenter randomized controlled trial. Nutrients. 2017;9(7):669. doi: 10.3390/nu9070669. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 44.Yap SKJ, Gwee KA, Chen Z, Tai BC, Wong ML. Lacteol fort treatment reduces antibiotic associated diarrhea. Singapore Fam Physician. 2010;36:46–49. [Google Scholar]
  • 45.Altuntaş B, Gül H, Yarali N, Ertan U. Etiology of chronic diarrhea. Indian J Pediatr. 1999;66(5):657–661. doi: 10.1007/bf02726245. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 46.Lovell RM, Ford AC. Prevalence of gastro-esophageal reflux-type symptoms in individuals with irritable bowel syndrome in the community: a meta-analysis. Am J Gastroenterol. 2012. quiz 1802. 10.1038/ajg.2012.336;107(12):1793–1801. doi: 10.1038/ajg.2012.336. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 47.Müller-Lissner SA, Bollani S, Brummer RJ, Coremans G, Dapoigny M, Marshall JK, Muris JW, Oberndorff-Klein Wolthuis A, Pace F, Rodrigo L, et al. Epidemiological aspects of irritable bowel syndrome in Europe and North America. Digestion. 2001;64(3):200–204. doi: 10.1159/000048862. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 48.Xiao SD, Zhang DZ, Lu H, Jiang SH, Liu HY, Wang GS, Xu GM, Zhang ZB, Lin GJ, Wang GL. Multicenter, randomized, controlled trial of heat-killed lactobacillus acidophilus lb in patients with chronic diarrhea. Adv Ther. 2003;20(5):253–260. doi: 10.1007/bf02849854. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 49.Andresen V, Gschossmann J, Layer P. Heat-inactivated bifidobacterium bifidum mimbb75 (syn-hi-001) in the treatment of irritable bowel syndrome: a multicentre, randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled clinical trial. Lancet Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2020;5(7):658–666. doi: 10.1016/s2468-1253(20)30056-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 50.Tarrerias AL, Costil V, Vicari F, Létard JC, Adenis-Lamarre P, Aisène A, Batistelli D, Bonnaud G, Carpentier S, Dalbiès P, et al. The effect of inactivated lactobacillus lb fermented culture medium on symptom severity: observational investigation in 297 patients with diarrhea-predominant irritable bowel syndrome. Dig Dis. 2011;29(6):588–591. doi: 10.1159/000332987. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 51.Coconnier MH, Lievin V, Hemery E, Servin AL. Antagonistic activity against helicobacter infection in vitro and in vivo by the human lactobacillus acidophilus strain lb. Appl Environ Microbiol. 1998;64(11):4573–4580. doi: 10.1128/aem.64.11.4573-4580.1998. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 52.Canducci F, Armuzzi A, Cremonini F, Cammarota G, Bartolozzi F, Pola P, Gasbarrini G, Gasbarrini A. A lyophilized and inactivated culture of lactobacillus acidophilus increases helicobacter pylori eradication rates. Aliment Pharmacol Ther. 2000;14(12):1625–1629. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2036.2000.00885.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 53.Mohamadzadeh M, Olson S, Kalina WV, Ruthel G, Demmin GL, Warfield KL, Bavari S, Klaenhammer TR. Lactobacilli activate human dendritic cells that skew t cells toward t helper 1 polarization. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2005;102(8):2880–2885. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0500098102. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 54.Yazdanbakhsh M, Kremsner PG, van Ree R. Allergy, parasites, and the hygiene hypothesis. Science. 2002;296(5567):490–494. doi: 10.1126/science.296.5567.490. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 55.Hassan IS, Bannister BA, Akbar A, Weir W, Bofill M. A study of the immunology of the chronic fatigue syndrome: correlation of immunologic parameters to health dysfunction. Clin Immunol Immunopathol. 1998;87(1):60–67. doi: 10.1006/clin.1997.4512. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 56.Majeed M, Majeed S, Nagabhushanam K, Mundkur L, Rajalakshmi HR, Shah K, Beede K. Novel topical application of a postbiotic, lactosporin®, in mild to moderate acne: a randomized, comparative clinical study to evaluate its efficacy, tolerability and safety. Cosmetics. 2020;7(3):70. doi: 10.3390/cosmetics7030070. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 57.Rinaldi F, Trink A, Pinto D. Efficacy of postbiotics in a prp-like cosmetic product for the treatment of alopecia area celsi: a randomized double-blinded parallel-group study. Dermatol Ther (Heidelb). 2020;10(3):483–493. doi: 10.1007/s13555-020-00369-9. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 58.Hirose Y, Murosaki S, Yamamoto Y, Yoshikai Y, Tsuru T. Daily intake of heat-killed lactobacillus plantarum l-137 augments acquired immunity in healthy adults. J Nutr. 2006;136(12):3069–3073. doi: 10.1093/jn/136.12.3069. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 59.Wang MF, Lin HC, Wang YY, Hsu CH. Treatment of perennial allergic rhinitis with lactic acid bacteria. Pediatr Allergy Immunol. 2004;15(2):152–158. doi: 10.1111/j.1399-3038.2004.00156.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 60.Peng GC, Hsu CH. The efficacy and safety of heat-killed lactobacillus paracasei for treatment of perennial allergic rhinitis induced by house-dust mite. Pediatr Allergy Immunol. 2005;16(5):433–438. doi: 10.1111/j.1399-3038.2005.00284.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 61.Rasche C, Wolfram C, Wahls M, Worm M. Differential immunomodulating effects of inactivated probiotic bacteria on the allergic immune response. Acta Derm Venereol. 2007;87(4):305–311. doi: 10.2340/00015555-0232. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 62.Homayouni Rad A, Aghebati Maleki L, Samadi Kafil H, Abbasi A. Postbiotics: a novel strategy in food allergy treatment. Crit Rev Food Sci Nutr. 2021;61(3):492–499. doi: 10.1080/10408398.2020.1738333. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 63.Maeda N, Nakamura R, Hirose Y, Murosaki S, Yamamoto Y, Kase T, Yoshikai Y. Oral administration of heat-killed lactobacillus plantarum l-137 enhances protection against influenza virus infection by stimulation of type i interferon production in mice. Int Immunopharmacol. 2009;9(9):1122–1125. doi: 10.1016/j.intimp.2009.04.015. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 64.Arimori Y, Nakamura R, Hirose Y, Murosaki S, Yamamoto Y, Shidara O, Ichikawa H, Yoshikai Y. Daily intake of heat-killed lactobacillus plantarum l-137 enhances type i interferon production in healthy humans and pigs. Immunopharmacol Immunotoxicol. 2012;34(6):937–943. doi: 10.3109/08923973.2012.672425. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 65.Cohen S, Tyrrell DA, Smith AP. Psychological stress and susceptibility to the common cold. N Engl J Med. 1991;325(9):606–612. doi: 10.1056/nejm199108293250903. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 66.Hirose Y, Yamamoto Y, Yoshikai Y, Murosaki S. Oral intake of heat-killed lactobacillus plantarum l-137 decreases the incidence of upper respiratory tract infection in healthy subjects with high levels of psychological stress. J Nutr Sci. 2013;2:e39. doi: 10.1017/jns.2013.35. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 67.Hishiki H, Kawashima T, Tsuji NM, Ikari N, Takemura R, Kido H, Shimojo N. 1A double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled trial of heat-killed pediococcus acidilactici k15 for prevention of respiratory tract infections among preschool children. Nutrients. 2020;12(7):1989. doi: 10.3390/nu12071989. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 68.Smith DJ, Joshipura K, Kent R, Taubman MA. Effect of age on immunoglobulin content and volume of human labial gland saliva. J Dent Res. 1992;71(12):1891–1894. doi: 10.1177/00220345920710120701. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 69.Challacombe SJ, Percival RS, Marsh PD. Age-related changes in immunoglobulin isotypes in whole and parotid saliva and serum in healthy individuals. Oral Microbiol Immunol. 1995;10(4):202–207. doi: 10.1111/j.1399-302x.1995.tb00143.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 70.Miletic ID, Schiffman SS, Miletic VD, Sattely-Miller EA. Salivary IgA secretion rate in young and elderly persons. Physiol Behav. 1996;60(1):243–248. doi: 10.1016/0031-9384(95)02161-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 71.Kotani Y, Shinkai S, Okamatsu H, Toba M, Ogawa K, Yoshida H, Fukaya T, Fujiwara Y, Chaves PH, Kakumoto K, et al. Oral intake of lactobacillus pentosus strain b240 accelerates salivary immunoglobulin a secretion in the elderly: a randomized, placebo-controlled, double-blind trial. Immun Ageing. 2010;7(11). doi: 10.1186/1742-4933-7-11 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 72.Shinkai S, Toba M, Saito T, Sato I, Tsubouchi M, Taira K, Kakumoto K, Inamatsu T, Yoshida H, Fujiwara Y, et al. Immunoprotective effects of oral intake of heat-killed lactobacillus pentosus strain b240 in elderly adults: a randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial. Br J Nutr. 2013;109(10):1856–1865. doi: 10.1017/s0007114512003753. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 73.Cryan JF, O’Mahony SM. The microbiome-gut-brain axis: from bowel to behavior. Neurogastroenterol Motil. 2011;23(3):187–192. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2982.2010.01664.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 74.Mayer EA. Gut feelings: the emerging biology of gut-brain communication. Nat Rev Neurosci. 2011;12(8):453–466. doi: 10.1038/nrn3071. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 75.Rhee SH, Pothoulakis C, Mayer EA. Principles and clinical implications of the brain-gut-enteric microbiota axis. Nat Rev Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2009;6(5):306–314. doi: 10.1038/nrgastro.2009.35. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 76.Cryan JF, Dinan TG. Mind-altering microorganisms: the impact of the gut microbiota on brain and behaviour. Nat Rev Neurosci. 2012;13(10):701–712. doi: 10.1038/nrn3346. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 77.Abildgaard A, Elfving B, Hokland M, Wegener G, Lund S. Probiotic treatment reduces depressive-like behaviour in rats independently of diet. Psychoneuroendocrinology. 2017;79(40):40–48. doi: 10.1016/j.psyneuen.2017.02.014. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 78.Ait-Belgnaoui A, Payard I, Rolland C, Harkat C, Braniste V, Théodorou V, Tompkins TA. Bifidobacterium longum and lactobacillus helveticus synergistically suppress stress-related visceral hypersensitivity through hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal axis modulation. J Neurogastroenterol Motil. 2018;24(1):138–146. doi: 10.5056/jnm16167. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 79.Bercik P, Park AJ, Sinclair D, Khoshdel A, Lu J, Huang X, Deng Y, Blennerhassett PA, Fahnestock M, Moine D, et al. The anxiolytic effect of bifidobacterium longum ncc3001 involves vagal pathways for gut-brain communication. Neurogastroenterol Motil. 2011;23(12):1132–1139. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2982.2011.01796.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 80.Takada M, Nishida K, Kataoka-Kato A, Gondo Y, Ishikawa H, Suda K, Kawai M, Hoshi R, Watanabe O, Igarashi T, et al. Probiotic lactobacillus casei strain shirota relieves stress-associated symptoms by modulating the gut-brain interaction in human and animal models. Neurogastroenterol Motil. 2016;28(7):1027–1036. doi: 10.1111/nmo.12804. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 81.Nishida K, Sawada D, Kuwano Y, Tanaka H, Rokutan K. Health benefits of lactobacillus gasseri cp2305 tablets in young adults exposed to chronic stress: a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study. Nutrients. 2019;11(8):1859. doi: 10.3390/nu11081859. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 82.Hossain MS, Tajima A, Kotoura S, Katafuchi T. Oral ingestion of plasmalogens can attenuate the lps-induced memory loss and microglial activation. Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 2018;496(4):1033–1039. doi: 10.1016/j.bbrc.2018.01.078. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 83.Fujino T, Yamada T, Asada T, Tsuboi Y, Wakana C, Mawatari S, Kono S. Efficacy and blood plasmalogen changes by oral administration of plasmalogen in patients with mild Alzheimer’s disease and mild cognitive impairment: a multicenter, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial. EBioMedicine. 2017;17(199):199–205. doi: 10.1016/j.ebiom.2017.02.012. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 84.Clarke G. The gut microbiome and depression: finding a way through troubled waters where the river meets the sea. Expert Rev Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2020;14(5):301–304. doi: 10.1080/17474124.2020.1754796. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 85.Flux MC, Lowry CA. Finding intestinal fortitude: integrating the microbiome into a holistic view of depression mechanisms, treatment, and resilience. Neurobiol Dis. 2020;135:104578. doi: 10.1016/j.nbd.2019.104578. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 86.Castillo-Álvarez F, Marzo-Sola ME. Role of intestinal microbiota in the development of multiple sclerosis. Neurologia. 2017;32(3):175–184. doi: 10.1016/j.nrl.2015.07.005. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 87.Melbye P, Olsson A, Hansen TH, Søndergaard HB, Bang Oturai A. Short-chain fatty acids and gut microbiota in multiple sclerosis. Acta Neurol Scand. 2019;139(3):208–219. doi: 10.1111/ane.13045. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 88.Foo HL, Loh T, Abdul Mutalib NE, Rahim RA. Microbiome and metabolome in diagnosis, therapy, and other strategic applications. 1st. The myth and therapeutic potentials of postbiotics. London, UK: Academic Press; p. 234. [Google Scholar]
  • 89.Cosola C, Rocchetti MT, Cupisti A, Gesualdo L. Microbiota metabolites: pivotal players of cardiovascular damage in chronic kidney disease. Pharmacol Res. 2018;130:132–142. doi: 10.1016/j.phrs.2018.03.003. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 90.O’Neill S, O’Driscoll L. Metabolic syndrome: a closer look at the growing epidemic and its associated pathologies. Obes Rev. 2015;16(1):1–12. doi: 10.1111/obr.12229. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 91.Cani PD, Van Hul M, Lefort C, Depommier C, Rastelli M, Everard A. Microbial regulation of organismal energy homeostasis. Nat Metab. 2019;1(1):34–46. doi: 10.1038/s42255-018-0017-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 92.Vallianou N, Stratigou T, Christodoulatos GS, Tsigalou C, Dalamaga M. Probiotics, prebiotics, synbiotics, postbiotics, and obesity: current evidence, controversies, and perspectives. Curr Obes Rep. 2020;9(3):179–192. doi: 10.1007/s13679-020-00379-w. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 93.Shin HS, Park SY, Lee DK, Kim SA, An HM, Kim JR, Kim MJ, Cha MG, Lee SW, Kim KJ, et al. Hypocholesterolemic effect of sonication-killed bifidobacterium longum isolated from healthy adult Koreans in high cholesterol fed rats. Arch Pharm Res. 2010;33(9):1425–1431. doi: 10.1007/s12272-010-0917-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 94.Williams L, Alshehri A, Robichaud B, Cudmore A, Gagnon J. The role of the bacterial muramyl dipeptide in the regulation of glp-1 and glycemia. Int J Mol Sci. 2020;21(15):5252. doi: 10.3390/ijms21155252. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 95.Everard A, Plovier H, Rastelli M, Van Hul M, de Wouters D’oplinter A, Geurts L, Druart C, Robine S, Delzenne NM, Muccioli GG, et al. Intestinal epithelial n-acylphosphatidylethanolamine phospholipase d links dietary fat to metabolic adaptations in obesity and steatosis. Nat Commun. 2019;10(1):457. doi: 10.1038/s41467-018-08051-7. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 96.Plovier H, Everard A, Druart C, Depommier C, Van Hul M, Geurts L, Chilloux J, Ottman N, Duparc T, Lichtenstein L, et al. A purified membrane protein from akkermansia muciniphila or the pasteurized bacterium improves metabolism in obese and diabetic mice. Nat Med. 2017;23(1):107–113. doi: 10.1038/nm.4236. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 97.Everard A, Belzer C, Geurts L, Ouwerkerk JP, Druart C, Bindels LB, Guiot Y, Derrien M, Muccioli GG, Delzenne NM, et al. Cross-talk between akkermansia muciniphila and intestinal epithelium controls diet-induced obesity. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2013;110(22):9066–9071. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1219451110. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 98.Depommier C, Everard A, Druart C, Plovier H, Van Hul M, Vieira-Silva S, Falony G, Raes J, Maiter D, Delzenne NM, et al. Supplementation with akkermansia muciniphila in overweight and obese human volunteers: a proof-of-concept exploratory study. Nat Med. 2019;25(7):1096–1103. doi: 10.1038/s41591-019-0495-2. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 99.Mu C, Yang Y, Zhu W. Gut microbiota: the brain peacekeeper. Front Microbiol. 2016;7:345. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2016.00345. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 100.Albillos A, de Gottardi A, Rescigno M. The gut-liver axis in liver disease: pathophysiological basis for therapy. J Hepatol. 2020;72(3):558–577. doi: 10.1016/j.jhep.2019.10.003. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 101.Zuo F, Marcotte H. Advancing mechanistic understanding and bioengineering of probiotic lactobacilli and bifidobacteria by genome editing. Curr Opin Biotechnol. 2021;70:75–82. 10.1016/j.copbio.2020.12.015. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Data Availability Statement

Data sharing is not applicable to this article as no new data were created or analyzed in this study.


Articles from Gut Microbes are provided here courtesy of Taylor & Francis

RESOURCES