Skip to main content
. 2022 Feb 23;34(5):913–926. doi: 10.1111/den.14237

Table 2.

Pooled prevalences of electrolyte disorders after bowel preparation with NaP or PEG

Bowel preparation Electrolyte disorder Number of studies included in the analysis Number of patients included in the analysis Pooled prevalence 95% CI I 2
NaP Hypokalemia 22 , 24 , 25 , 29 , 30 , 32 , 33 7 564 17.19% 6.69, 30.95 92.37%
Hyponatremia 22 , 29 , 30 , 32 4 308 0.86% 0.00, 4.07 54.8%
Hyperphosphatemia 22 , 25 , 28 , 29 , 30 , 32 , 33 7 560 37.26% 12.24, 66.45 97.8%
Hypocalcemia 22 , 24 , 25 , 28 , 29 , 30 , 32 , 33 8 596 15.59% 3.67, 32.94 95.6%
High‐volume PEG Hypokalemia 25 , 27 , 29 , 30 , 32 5 271 4.83% 0.27, 13.02 80.19%
Hyponatremia 27 , 29 , 30 , 32 5 222 3.30% 0.00, 12.41 82.3%
Hyperphosphatemia 30 , 32 2 96 0.65% 0.00, 4.06 5.12%
Hypocalcemia 25 , 27 , 29 , 30 , 32 5 271 8.07% 1.39, 18.63 83.43%

CI, confidence interval; NaP, sodium phosphate; PEG, polyethylene glycol.