Skip to main content
. 2022 Apr 9;30(5):e1449–e1470. doi: 10.1111/hsc.13812

TABLE 1.

Summary characteristics of studies included in the scoping literature review

Name Country Aim(s) Method(s)
1 Acker (2017) USA Transphobia among students majoring in the helping professions. Questionnaire completed by 600 undergraduate students (social work, nursing, psychology, occupational therapy). Data analysis: quantitative ‐ descriptive & complex statistical analysis.
2 Ahrendt et al. (2017) USA Ageism & heterosexism re. older adult sexual activity among care providers in long‐term care facilities. Vignette‐based questionnaire completed by 153 residential care staff (one religious‐based home, one public). Data analysis: quantitative ‐ descriptive & complex statistical analysis.
3 Almack et al. (2010) UK Impact of sexual orientation on end‐of‐life care & bereavement within same‐sex relationships. 4 focus groups with 15 lesbian & gay older people. Data analysis: qualitative ‐ narrative analysis.
4 Atteberry‐Ash et al. (2019) USA LGBTQ social work students’ experiences of ‘harmful discourse’. Interviews with 12 students: Data analysis – qualitative (phenomenological analysis).
5 Austin et al. (2016) USA Trans social work students’ experiences at multiple universities. Questionnaire completed by 97 trans social work students. Data analysis: quantitative ‐ descriptive & complex statistical analysis; qualitative ‐ thematic analysis;
6 Aynur et al. (2020) Turkey Nurse attitudes to LGBT people & demographics that influence them. Questionnaire completed by 192 nurses working in a university hospital. Data analysis: quantitative ‐ descriptive & complex statistical analysis.
7 Barker (2013) USA Christian students’ experiences of social work educational programs. Four focus groups with Christian social workers (total n = 30). Data analysis: qualitative ‐ thematic, no model described.
8 Baiocco et al. (2021) 7 countries LGBT+training needs of health/social care staff in UK, Denmark, Spain, Germany, Cyprus, Italy & Romania. Questionnaire completed by 412 health & social care academics & workers. Data analysis: quantitative ‐ descriptive & complex statistical analysis.
9 Banwari et al. (2015) India Medical students & interns’ knowledge about & attitude towards ‘homosexuality’ Questionnaire completed by 339 medical students & interns. Data analysis: quantitative ‐ descriptive & complex statistical analysis.
10 Bennett et al. (2017) [Same dataset as Chapman et al. (2012)] Australia Nurse attitudes towards LGBT+parents seeking health care for their children. Questionnaire completed by 51 nurses & allied professionals. Data analysis: quantitative ‐ descriptive & complex statistical analysis; qualitative ‐ thematic analysis.
11 BMA (2016) UK Attitudes towards LGB doctors & medical students in the workplace or place of study. Questionnaire completed by 803 doctors/students identifying as LGB/ ‘prefer not to say’/did not respond. Methodology not described. Reporting = descriptive statistics & themed analysis.
12 Butler (2017) USA Older lesbians' experiences of home care. Interviews with 20 lesbians aged 65 & over who had received home care services within the preceding 10 years. Data analysis: qualitative ‐ grounded theory.
13 Byers et al. (2020) USA & Canada Social work students' experiences of homophobic & transphobic microaggressions. Questionnaire completed by 824 social work students. Data analysis = mixed methods: quantitative ‐ descriptive & complex statistical analysis; qualitative ‐ thematic analysis.
14 Carabez et al. (2015) USA Nursing students' knowledge of LGBT healthcare needs & evaluate of effects of a teaching intervention. Questionnaire completed by 120 students completed a survey. Data analysis: methods not described. Reporting comprised descriptive statistics & themed analysis.
15 Cartwright et al. (2012) Australia LGBT issues re. end‐of‐life care & advance care planning. Telephone consultations (quasi‐interview) with 19 service providers & 6 members of LGBT community organisations. Data analysis ‐ qualitative, grounded theory.
16 Cele et al. (2015) South Africa ‘Homosexual’ patients’ experiences of primary health care 12 semi‐structured interviews. Data analysis: qualitative ‐ content analysis.
17 Chapman et al. (2012) Same dataset as Bennett et al. (2017)] Australia Nursing & medical students’ knowledge & attitudes re. LGBT parents Questionnaire completed by 150 nursing students & 171 medical students. Data analysis: quantitative ‐ descriptive & complex statistical analysis.
18 Chaze et al. (2019) Canada Long‐term care homes’ websites’ inclusion of ethnoculturally diverse & LGBTQ older adults. Content analysis of 103 long‐term care homes' websites. Data analysis: qualitative ‐ content analysis.
19 Chonody et al. (2014) USA Sexual prejudice separately toward gay men & lesbians among heterosexual social work faculty. Questionnaire completed by 303 faculty staff. Data analysis: quantitative ‐ descriptive & complex statistical analysis.
20 Chonody et al. (2013) USA Catholic & Protestant social work students’ attitudes towards lesbians and gay men. Questionnaire completed by 383 “completely heterosexual” students from four universities. Data analysis: quantitative ‐ descriptive & complex statistical analysis.
21 Cloyes et al. (2020) USA Hospice interdisciplinary teams’ attitudes toward sexual & gender minority patients & caregivers. Questionnaire completed by 122 hospice team members across multiple hospices. Data analysis: quantitative ‐ descriptive & complex statistical analysis.
22 Coolhart and Brown (2017) USA Homeless LGBTQ teenagers and young adults’ experiences in in homeless shelters. Semi‐structured interviews with young adults (14–21) (n = 7) who have used homeless services & providers of homeless services (n−9). Data analysis: qualitative ‐ grounded theory.
23 Cornelius and Carrick (2015) USA Nursing students’ knowledge of & attitudes toward LGBT healthcare concerns Questionnaire completed by 190 nursing students. Data analysis not described. Reporting comprised descriptive statistics & themed analysis.
24 Corrêa‐Ribeiro et al. (2018) Brazil Adapt questionnaire to evaluate the knowledge of ‘homosexuality’ among heterosexual physicians in Brazil. Questionnaire completed by 22 physicians. Data analysis: quantitative ‐ descriptive & complex statistical analysis.
25 de Jong (2017) USA Christian social work faculty members' attitudes towards transgender & gender‐variant people. Questionnaire completed by 41 faculty members, across multiple social work schools. Data analysis: quantitative ‐ descriptive statistics.
26 Dessel et al. (2012) USA & Canada Social work faculty's attitudes re 'people of Color’, women, lesbian & gay people, their religious affiliation & religiosity. Questionnaire completed by 327 faculty members. Data analysis: quantitative ‐ descriptive & complex statistical analysis.
27 Dunjić‐Kostić et al. (2012) Serbia Medical students’ knowledge about & attitudes towards ‘homosexuality’. Questionnaire completed by 177 physicians & students. Data analysis: quantitative ‐ descriptive & complex statistical analysis.
28 Fisher et al. (2017) Italy Compare attitudes toward LGBT people among 'gender dysphoric individuals', controls & healthcare providers. Questionnaire completed by 310 respondents. Data analysis: quantitative ‐ descriptive & complex statistical analysis.
29 Fredriksen‐Goldsen et al. (2011) USA & Canada Social work faculty's attitudes towards LGBT people. Analysis of survey data subset (n = 327). Data analysis: quantitative ‐ descriptive & complex statistical analysis.
30 Guasp (2011) UK Surveys of 1050 heterosexual & 1036 LGB older people re. experiences & expectations of ageing Not described. Questionnaire data. Reporting comprised descriptive statistics & themed analysis.
31 Hafford‐Letchfield et al. (2018) [Shared dataset with Willis et al. (2018)] UK LGBT+action research project with six care homes for older people to assess & develop services. 35 semi‐structured telephone interviews pre‐& post‐interventions with 18 care home managers (CHMs), Community Advisors (CAs) & senior managers & a single focus group. Data analysis: qualitative ‐ thematic analysis.
32 Hatiboğlu et al. (2019) Turkey Social work students’ strategies for resolving conflicts between their personal & professional values. ‘Reflections of 34 students’ attending a creative drama‐based group. Data were notes & memos, reflective diaries, group discussions. Data analysis: qualitative ‐ grounded theory.
33 Henrickson et al. (2021) New Zealand Older age residential care staff's, residents’ & family members’ attitudes towards 'sexually diverse' people. Interviews with 77 participants including staff, residents & family members. Data analysis: qualitative ‐ thematic.
34 Holman et al. (2020) USA Efficacy of LGBT‐diversity training with senior housing facility staff Pre‐ & post‐test surveys of 59 staff. Data analysis: quantitative ‐ descriptive & complex statistical analysis.
35 Howard et al. (2020) Canada How managers navigate resident sexual expression in care homes. 28 in‐depth interviews with managers, clinical ethicists, geriatric specialists, & social workers. Data analysis: qualitative thematic analysis.
36 Jaffee et al. (2016) Canada & USA Incoming social work students’ attitudes toward sexual minorities Questionnaire completed by 376 social work students. Data analysis: quantitative ‐ descriptive & complex statistical analysis.
37 Johnston and Shearer (2017) USA Medical residents' attitudes, prior education, comfort, & knowledge re. transgender primary care. Questionnaire completed by 67 internal medicine residents. Data analysis not described. Reporting comprised descriptive statistics.
38 Joslin et al. (2016) USA Social work students’ experiences in a Christianity & sexual minority intergroup dialogue. Retrospective interviews with Christian‐LGB (n = 2) secular‐LGB (n = 3) & Christian heterosexual (n = 5) social work students. Data analysis: qualitative ‘constant coding method’.
39 Knocker (2012) UK Older LGB people's views and experiences of getting older & expectations of support services Eight in‐depth interviews. Data analysis not described.
40 Kwak and Kim (2019) South Korea Homophobia among nursing students Survey of 265 nursing students. Data analysis: quantitative ‐ descriptive and complex statistics.
41 Lennon‐Dearing and Delavega (2016) USA Social workers’ & future social workers’ attitudes towards LGBT people Questionnaire completed by 215 social workers & social work students. Data analysis methodology not detailed. Reporting comprised descriptive & complex statistical analysis.
42 Leung (2016) Hong Kong Barriers to lesbian & gay people obtaining social services’ help after same‐sex partner abuse Nine interviews with lesbians & gay men who had been abused by their same‐sex partners. Data analysis: qualitative ‐ grounded theory.
43 Lim et al. (2015) USA Baccalaureate nursing program faculty's knowledge about & readiness to teach re. LGBT health. Questionnaire completed by over 1000 nursing faculty. Data analysis: quantitative – descriptive statistics; qualitative ‐ themed analysis
44 Lopes et al. (2016) Portugal Medical students’ knowledge & attitudes towards homosexuality Questionnaire completed by 489 medical students. Data analysis: quantitative ‐ descriptive & complex statistical analysis.
45 McCarty‐Caplan (2018) USA Organizational LGBT‐competence of social work program and its students. Two‐stage survey. Full details not provided. Original thesis cited as source of more detailed methodology. Quantitative ‐ statistical analysis.
46 Messinger et al.(2020) USA & Canada Social work students’ experiences in field placement related to their sexual orientation and/or gender identity. Qualitative thematic analysis of 207 survey responses from a larger study (Craig et al., 2015).
47 Ng et al. (2015) Malaysia Nursing students’ attitudes toward homosexuality. Questionnaires completed by 495 nursing students in Malaysia. Data analysis: quantitative ‐ descriptive & complex statistical analysis.
48 Nieto‐Gutierrez et al. (2019) Peru Social, educational & cultural factors associated with homophobia among medical students. Questionnaire completed by 883 medical students at 11 universities. Data analysis: quantitative ‐ descriptive & complex statistical analysis.
49 Papadaki et al. (2013) Crete, Greece Social work students’ attitudes towards lesbians & gay men Questionnaire completed by 281 social work students. Data analysis: quantitative ‐ descriptive & complex statistical analysis.
50 Pelts and Galambos (2017) USA Responses of 60 LTC staff who participated in a storytelling event involving older lesbian & older gay man Questionnaire completed by 60 LTC staff, pre‐/post‐ storytelling intervention. Data analysis: quantitative ‐ descriptive & complex statistical analysis.
51 Prairie et al. (2019) USA Religiosity, geographic areas & healthcare professionals' attitudes toward ‘LGB & asexual’ people Data from 1376 healthcare professionals (MDs & dentists) via public database. Data analysis not described. Reporting comprised descriptive & complex statistics /themed analysis.
52 Prairie et al. (2018) USA Healthcare providers’ perceived autonomy, religious faith & medical practice re. providing care for LGBT+people. Questionnaire completed by 42 physicians & medical residents. Open ended questions, free‐text answers Data analysis: qualitative ‐ thematic.
53 Robinson (2016) 5 countries Aspects of ageing concerning older gay men in USA, Australia, New Zealand, UK. Interviews with 25 men aged 60 & older who were recruited in Auckl&, London, Manchester, Melbourne, & New York. Data analysis: qualitative ‐ narrative analysis.
54 Schaub et al. (2017) UK Social workers’ beliefs & values about sexuality in relation to everyday professional interactions Questionnaire completed by 112 social workers. Data analysis: quantitative ‐ descriptive & complex statistical analysis.
55 Simpson et al. (2016) UK Care home staff's attitudes, knowledge/policies & practices re LGBT residents. Questionnaire completed by 187 individuals, including service managers & direct care staff. Data analysis (not described): descriptive statistics
56 Sirota (2013) USA Attitudes of nurse educators toward 'homosexuality' Survey of 1282 nurse educators. Data analysis: quantitative ‐ descriptive and complex statistics.
57 Somerville (2015) UK LGBT staff's experiences in health & social care settings. Stonewall‐commissioned survey of LGBT+staff in health & social care settings. Data analysis: not described. Reporting comprised descriptive statistics & themed analysis.
58 Sutter et al. (2020) USA Oncologists’ experiences of caring for LGBTQ cancer patients. Questionnaire completed by 149 oncologists. Open ended questions, free‐text answers. Data analysis: qualitative ‐ inductive content analysis & 'constant comparison' method.
59 Swank and Raiz (2010) USA Social work students’ attitudes toward lesbian & gay individuals. Questionnaire completed by 575 "completely heterosexual" students at 12 institutions. Data analysis: quantitative ‐ descriptive & complex statistical analysis.
60 Szél et al. (2020) Hungary Medical students' knowledge about 'homosexuality’ and attitudes toward LGBTQ people. Questionnaire completed by 568 medical students. Data analysis: quantitative ‐ descriptive & complex statistical analysis.
61 Unlu et al. (2016) Turkey Nursing students’ attitudes re gay men & lesbians Questionnaire completed by 964 nursing students. Data analysis: quantitative ‐ descriptive & complex statistical analysis.
62 Vinjamuri (2017) USA Social work students’ experiences of semester‐long course on social work with LGBT individuals & families. Externally facilitated focus groups (13 participants). Recorded & transcribed data were analysed using grounded theory.
63 Wahlen et al. (2020) Switzerland Medical students’ attitudes towards/knowledge re. LGBT people and impact of training event. Pre‐/post‐test surveys of 96 students who attended a lecture on sexual orientation & gender identity health issues. Data analysis: quantitative ‐ descriptive & complex statistical analysis.
64 Wang et al. (2020) Taiwan Nurses’ attitudes toward & knowledge about sexual minorities and providing them with care. Questionnaire completed by 323 Taiwanese nurses. Data analysis: quantitative ‐ descriptive & complex statistical analysis.
65 Westwood (2017) 4 countries How older lesbian, gay, & bisexual (LGB) people engage with religion in later life. Data subset of interviews with 60 UK LGB older people & 20 activists in Canada, USA, Australia & UK. Data analysis: thematic (Braun & Clarke, 2006).
66

Willis et al. (2018)

[Same dataset, Hafford‐Letchfield et al. (2018)]

UK LGBT+action research project with six care homes for older people to assess & develop services. Evaluation, via telephone interviews, of action‐research intervention conducted by Data analysis: qualitative, methodology, not described.
67 Willis et al. (2017) UK Gauge the views, attitudes & knowledge levels of care & nursing staff, in relation to LGBT people. Mixed methods: (1) Questionnaire 121 staff; 9 focus groups (practitioner/ policy stakeholders). Data analysis: questionnaire = quantitative ‐ descriptive & complex statistical analysis.; focus groups = qualitative ‐ themed analysis (type(s) not specified).
68 Wilson et al. (2014) USA Professional, demographic & training characteristics & health professions student attitudes toward LGBT patients. Questionnaire completed by 475 healthcare students (mental health, medicine, nursing, dentistry, allied health sciences, e.g., dental hygiene, occupational therapy, physical therapy, & physician assistant). Data analysis: quantitative ‐ descriptive & complex statistical analysis.
69 Woodford et al. (2021) USA Association between social work students’ LGB attitudes, religious teaching, own beliefs & religiosity. Questionnaire completed by 253 incoming MSW students. Data analysis: quantitative ‐ descriptive & complex statistical analysis.
70 Woodford et al. (2013) USA Social work faculty's attitudes towards LGBT+people & associated sociodemographic factors. Questionnaire completed by 161 social work faculty. Data analysis: quantitative ‐ descriptive & complex statistical analysis.