Skip to main content
. 2022 Oct 7;17(10):e0274480. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0274480

Table 3. Reliability of valence, arousal, and comprehensibility ratings for English texts and the texts in their original language as averages of ICC(2,k).

Valence Arousal Compreh.
Language Groups Raters / group M Lb Ub M Lb Ub M Lb Ub
English 25 20–25 .97 .93 .99 .87 .71 .96 .80 .55 .94
Finnish 3 25–26 .99 .97 .99 .96 .93 .99 .54 .22 .82
French 1 12 .96 .94 .97 .87 .81 .92 .81 .71 .88
German 3 17–20 .98 .97 .99 .92 .85 .96 .83 .68 .92
Portuguese 6 6–14 .95 .84 .99 .48 .03 .94 .53 .11 .94
Spanish 3 21–27 .96 .87 .99 .70 .37 .96 .75 .49 .96
Turkish 2 5 .83 .68 .92 .67 .37 .85 .44 .13 .74

Note. Groups = number of rater groups, Lbound = Lower bound, Ubound = Upper bound, Compreh. = Comprehensibility.