Skip to main content
. 2022 Aug 5;22(9):759–765. doi: 10.1111/ggi.14451

Table 3.

Association of handgrip strength weakness and asymmetry together on cardiovascular outcomes in elderly outpatients

Normal and symmetric HGS (n = 127) HGS weakness or asymmetry only (n = 159) HGS weakness and asymmetry (n = 78)
HR (95% CI) P‐value HR (95% CI) P‐value HR (95% CI) P‐value
MACE
Model 1 1 (control) 3.21 (1.07–9.68) 0.038 7.56 (2.53–22.63) <0.001
Model 2 1 (control) 2.86 (0.95–8.67) 0.063 4.74 (1.49–15.05) 0.008
Model 3 1 (control) 3.18 (0.99–10.17) 0.051 5.23 (1.56–17.54) 0.007
Composite end‐points
Model 1 1 (control) 2.31 (0.97–5.49) 0.059 6.46 (2.78–15.00) <0.001
Model 2 1 (control) 2.02 (0.85–4.83) 0.114 3.93 (1.60–9.61) 0.003
Model 3 1 (control) 1.94 (0.77–4.88) 0.157 4.00 (1.56–10.28) 0.004

HGS, handgrip strength; MACE, major adverse cardiovascular event (a composite of cardiac death, acute myocardial infarction, hospitalization for unstable angina, hospitalization for congestive heart failure, and acute stroke). Composite end‐points: a composite of all‐cause mortality, acute myocardial infarction, hospitalization for unstable angina, hospitalization for congestive heart failure, and acute stroke. Model 1: unadjusted. Model 2: adjusted for age and sex. Model 3: adjusted as Model 2 with body mass index, smoking, drinking, hypertension, diabetes, hyperlipidemia, heart failure and coronary heart disease.