Skip to main content
. 2021 Nov 10;99(3):736–745. doi: 10.1002/ccd.30007

TABLE 3.

Comparison of QFR/iFR discordant groups

QFR−/iFR + group (n = 32) QFR+/iFR− group (n = 18) p value
Patient characteristics
Age 68.7 ± 9.9 64.3 ± 9.9 0.144
Sex male 25 (92.6) 15 (88.2) 0.715
Hypertension 28 (87.5) 12 (66.7) 0.244
Dyslipidaemia 20 (64.5) 9 (50.0) 0.753
Diabetes mellitus 15 (46.9) 6 (33.3) 0.388
Smoking 7 (21.9) 3 (16.7) 0.142
Peripheral artery disease 12 (37.5) 4 (22.2) 0.514
Previous PCI 15 (46.9) 7 (38.9) 0.762
CKD 11 (34.4) 4 (22.2) 0.520
LAD 16 (50.0) 12 (64.7) 0.374
Non‐LAD 16 (50.0) 16 (45.3)
Proximal lesions 13 (40.6) 3 (16.7) 0.081
Physiological indices
FFR 0.84 ± 0.05 0.81 ± 0.06 0.113
QFR 0.86 ± 0.05 0.72 ± 0.07 0.001
iFR 0.83 ± 0.07 0.94 ± 0.02 0.001
Pattern of coronary artery disease
iFR pullback physiologically focal 6 (18.8) 10 (55.6) 0.012
iFR pullback physiologically diffuse 26 (81.2) 8 (44.4)
QFR pullback physiologically focal 10 (31.3) 13 (72.2) 0.008
QFR pullback physiologically diffuse 22 (68.7) 5 (28.8)
Angiographically focal 16 (50.0) 10 (55.6) 0.706
Angiographically diffuse 16 (50.0) 8 (44.4)

Abbreviations: CKD, chronic kidney disease; FFR, fractional flow reserve; iFR, instantaneous wave‐free ratio; LAD, left anterior descending artery; PCI, percutaneous coronary intervention; QFR, quantitative flow reserve.