Skip to main content
. 2022 Jul 20;37(9):1693–1709. doi: 10.1111/jgh.15927

Table 2.

Overview of gastrointestinal symptoms observed in studies of patients with hypermobilility spectrum disorder/hypermobile Ehlers–Danlos Syndrome (HSD/hEDS) (excluding studies in gastroenterology specialist clinics)

Author, year Classification utilized Study type Study setting and number of patients Symptom prevalence
Castori et al., 2010 3 Villefranche criteria + Brighton criteria Observational cross‐sectional

General genetics outpatients; Italy

n = 21 (18 female)

Reflux/heartburn (57%); dyspepsia (67%); abdominal pain (62%); constipation/diarrhea (33%); hernias (abdominal) (5%)
Castori et al., 2011 25 Villefranche criteria + Brighton criteria Observational cross‐sectional

Multidisciplinary joint hypermobility clinic; Italy

Cumulative prevalence of symptoms according to age reported—based on patient recall

n = 50 (44 female)

By age ≥ 40 years: reflux/heartburn (74%); abdominal pain (68%); chronic gastritis (48%); alternating bowel habits (72%); hernias (abdominal) (20%)
Mastoroudes et al., 2013 31 Revised 1998 Brighton criteria Observational case–control

Hypermobility clinic; UK

n = 60 HSD/hEDS; 60 age‐matched and sex‐matched controls from medical staff

Obstructive defecation symptoms: 23% vs 5% controls (P = 0.007); straining: 62% (P < 0.001); incomplete evacuation: 63% (P < 0.001); digitation: 33% (P = 0.001); constipation: 72% (P < 0.001)
Zeitoun et al., 2013 28 Villefranche criteria Observational cross‐sectional

EDS patient support group; France

n = 134 (122 female); 108 HSD/hEDS

64% survey response rate

Nausea (71%); reflux/heartburn (69%); dysphagia (63%); regurgitation (69%); postprandial fullness (67%); belching (71%); epigastric pain (71%); constipation (36%); IBS‐like symptoms (48%)
Castori et al., 2014 24 Villefranche criteria Observational cross‐sectional Pedigrees were selected from two Italian outpatient clinics for EDS and inherited connective tissue disorders. 23 families with HSD/hEDS (n = 82) Reflux/heartburn (34%); chronic gastritis (23%); abdominal pain (20%); constipation (28%)
Nelson et al., 2015 14 Villefranche criteria + Brighton criteria Observational retrospective

Medical Genetics Clinic (1994–2013)

687 EDS patients (n = 471 HSD/hEDS)

No control group included

HSD/hEDS vs other EDS: constipation: 42% vs 29% (P = 0.02); nausea: 44% vs 37%; reflux/heartburn: 38% vs 36%; vomiting: 25% vs 22%; waterbrash: 1% vs 2%; dysphagia: 11% vs 12%; regurgitation: 4% vs 6%; postprandial fullness: 7% vs 3%; bloating: 17% vs 10%; dyspepsia: 11% vs 7%; abdominal pain: 56% vs 56%;

diarrhea: 23% vs 17%; fecal urgency: 1.5% vs 2.8%

Fikree et al., 2017 21 Villefranche criteria + Brighton criteria Cross‐sectional, double‐blinded, case–control

University students (without prior diagnosis of HSD/hEDS); UK

HSD/hEDS: n = 74 (48 female)

Controls: n = 88

HSD/hEDS vs controls: postprandial fullness: 34% vs 16% (P = 0.01); early satiety: 32% vs 17% (P = 0.03); bloating: 26% vs 23% (P = 0.59); functional dyspepsia: 39% vs 23% controls (P = 0.02);

No differences in lower gastrointestinal symptoms (IBS, constipation, diarrhea, alternating bowel habit, ≤ 4 bowel motions/week).

Inayet et al., 2018 27 Not specified Observational cross‐sectional, case–control

Cardiology and rheumatology clinics; UK

45 Marfan syndrome and 45 HSD/hEDS (33 female)

90 age‐matched and sex‐matched controls

HSD/hEDS vs controls: functional abdominal pain: 69% vs 27% (P < 0.001); functional constipation: 73% vs 16% (P < 0.001); functional diarrhea: 47% vs 9% (P < 0.001); IBS: 33% vs 7% (P = 0.0014); functional heartburn: 47% vs 13% (P = 0.0011); functional dyspepsia: 38% vs 9% control (P = 0.029); functional bloating/distension: 31% vs 7% (P = 0.006)
Nee et al., 2019 23 Not specified (Villefranche and Berlin nomenclature accepted) Observational, cross‐sectional

Members of local and national Marfan and EDS societies; US

EDS: n = 1804

HSD/hEDS, n = 1325);

MFS: n = 600);

94% female

HSD/hEDS vs other subtypes of EDS: aerophagia: 24% vs 26% (P = 0.35); bloating: 13% 12%; heartburn: 32% vs 37% (P = 0.04); dysphagia: 29% vs 28%; IBS: 58% vs 56%; functional constipation: 8% vs 7%; diarrhea: 0.5% vs 1.3%; functional dyspepsia: 55% vs 56%
Alomari et al., 2020 36 2017 International classification of EDS Observational retrospective

Genetics clinic; US

n = 218 (198 female)

63% gastrointestinal symptoms at hEDS diagnosis (63%); abdominal pain (50%); nausea (50%); constipation (45%); diarrhea (38%); heartburn (36%); belching/bloating (27%); vomiting (26%); IBS‐like symptoms (22%); dysphagia (14%); fecal incontinence (6%)
Lam et al., 2020 5 Not specified Case–control

EDS support group; UK

HSD/hEDS: n = 603

Age‐matched and sex‐matched controls: n = 1994

Mean age: 39 years, 96% female

20% survey response rate

HSD/hEDS vs control: functional dyspepsia: 57% vs 9% (P < 0.0001); IBS: 54% vs 8% (P < 0.001); functional dysphagia: 42% vs 4% (P < 0.001); rumination: 31% vs 5% (P < 0.001); functional constipation: 12% vs 10%; functional diarrhea: 5% vs 4.6%; functional anorectal disorders: 53% vs 9% (P < 0.001)
Tai et al., 2020 71 Not specified Observational cross‐sectional, case–control

EDS support group: UK

Established HSD/hEDS and hypermobility spectrum disorder: n = 616 (573 female); mean age 39 years

PoTS n = 231

20% survey response

PoTS vs non‐PoTS: functional esophageal disorders: 66% vs 50% (P < 0.001); functional heartburn: 31% vs 21% (P = 0.007); functional dysphagia: 51% vs 37% (P = 0.001); functional gastroduodenal disorders: 75% vs 67% (P = 0.04); functional dyspepsia: 68% vs 50% (P < 0.001); postprandial distress syndrome: 63% vs 42% (P < 0.001); epigastric pain syndrome: 40% vs 28% (P = 0.002); functional bowel disorders: 89% vs 91% (P = 0.5); IBS: 59% vs 51%; functional diarrhea: 3% vs 7% (P = 0.01); functional anorectal disorders: 60% vs 49% (P = 0.01)

Villefranche criteria. 1