TABLE 3.
Reference | Province | Sand fly species | Sample type | Diagnostic method | No. | Positives | Percentage infected |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Özbel et al. (2016) | Aydin | Sergentomyia dentata | Individual | Dissection | 51 | 1 | 1.96 |
Svobodová et al. (2009) | Osmaniye | Phlebotomus tobbi | Individual | Dissection | 579 | 11 | 1.90 |
Adana | Phlebotomus tobbi | Individual | Dissection | 551 | 2 | 0.36 | |
Özbel et al. (2016) | Aydin | Phlebotomus tobbi | Individual | Dissection | 571 | 1 | 0.18 |
Aydin | Phlebotomus tobbi | Individual | PCR | 571 | 1 | 0.18 | |
Bolukbas et al. (2016) | Sinop | Unknown | Individual | PCR | 18 | 0 | 0.00 |
Töz et al. (2009) | Denizli | Unknown | Individual | Dissection | 180 | 0 | 0.00 |
Karakuş et al. (2017) | Aydin | Phlebotomus neglectus | Pool | PCR | NA | 3 | 5.17 |
Aydin | Phlebotomus tobbi | Pool | PCR | NA | 3 | 3.84 | |
Demir & Karakuş (2015) | Sanliurfa | Phlebotomus sergenti | Pool | PCR | 111 | 4 | 3.60 |
Özbel et al. (2020) | Mardin | Phlebotomus sergenti | Pool | PCR | 38 | 1 | 2.63 |
Kavur et al. (2015) | Adana | Phlebotomus tobbi | Pool | PCR | 131 | 2 | 1.53 |
Karakuş, Arserim, et al. (2019) | Izmir | Phlebotomus tobbi | Pool | PCR | 229 | 3 | 1.31 |
Kavur et al. (2015) | Adana | Phlebotomus papatasi | Pool | PCR | 94 | 1 | 1.06 |
Karakuş et al. (2017) | Aydin | Sergentomyia dentata | Pool | PCR | NA | 1 | 1.03 |
Kavur et al. (2018) | Afyon | Phlebotomus halepensis | Pool | PCR | 433 | 3 | 0.69 |
Nidge | Phlebotomus papatasi | Pool | PCR | 320 | 2 | 0.63 |