Skip to main content
. 2022 May 2;88(8):3638–3656. doi: 10.1111/bcp.15345

TABLE 2.

Study characteristics and results

(a) Trials including patients
Trials Population Information modifying the power of the placebo effect Treatment group Endpoints Interaction found? (which model?) Risk of bias
Faasse et al (2016) 41 87 patients with chronic headaches Oral information provided on the treatment brand administered: minimized or maximized situations Ibuprofen Pain Yes (antagonistic) Unclear
Bergmann et al (1994) 9 49 cancer patients Oral information provided or not on the study procedure: neutral or maximized situations Naproxen Pain Yes (antagonistic) High
Wise et al (2009) 42 601 poorly controlled asthmatics Oral information provided on the treatment administered, its brand and its colour: neutral or maximized situations Montelukast Peak expiratory flow, spirometry and four self‐assessment asthma scales Yes (antagonistic) High
Levine et al (1984) 45 96 patients having undergone dental extraction Hidden administration of treatments, manually or by a machine: minimized, neutral or maximized situations Naloxone Pain Yes (antagonistic) High
Uhlenhuth et al (1959) 7 52 psychiatric patients suffering from anxiety Neutral or positive attitude concerning the treatments administered: neutral or maximized situations Meprobamate or phenobarbital Improvement perceived by patients, assessment by a psychiatrist and a scale grouping together 45 symptoms Yes (synergistic) High
Uhlenhuth et al (1966) 46 138 patients referred to psychiatric clinic Neutral or positive attitude concerning the treatments administered: neutral or maximized situations Meprobamate in neutral or maximized situation Modifications on different scales Yes (antagonistic) High
Kam‐Hansen et al (2014) 25 66 chronic migraine patients Oral information on the treatment administered: minimized, neutral or maximized situations Razatriptan Pain No (additive) Low
Kemeny et al (2007) 43 55 poorly controlled asthmatics Oral information provided on the treatment administered: neutral or maximized situations Salmeterol Concentration of methacholine needed to induce a 20% FEV1 decrease No (no effect) Low
Mathews et al (1983) 47 48 couples presenting with sexual disorders Frequency of administration and number of therapists: weekly, monthly and at least one therapist Testosterone Improvement of symptoms evaluated by an outside investigator and the couples themselves No (no effect) High
De Craen et al (2001) 16 112 chronic pain patients Written information on the treatment administered: neutral or maximized situations Tramadol Pain No (no effect) High
Brandwhaite et al (1981) 36 835 women with chronic headaches Oral information provided on the “brand” of treatment administered: minimized or maximized situations Aspirin Pain No (additive) High
(b) Trials including healthy volunteers
Trials Population Information modifying the power of the placebo effect Treatment group Endpoints Interaction found? (which model?) Risk ok bias
Schenk et al (2013) 40 34 healthy volunteers Oral information provided on the treatment administered: minimized or maximized situation Lidocaine Pain after painful thermal stimulus Yes (synergistic) Low
Hammami et al (2016) 27 480 healthy volunteers Oral information on the treatment administered: minimized, neutral or maximized situations Hydroxyzine Drowsiness and dry mouth Yes (synergistic) Low
Berna et al (2017) 33 100 healthy volunteers Oral information that an analgesic yielding a dry mouth would be administered (in fact, it was atropine): minimized or maximized situations Diclofenac Pain after painful thermal stimulus Yes (synergistic) Low
Lund et al (2014) 31 46 healthy volunteers Oral information on the treatment administered: minimized or maximized situations Lidocaine Self‐assessed pain duration and its maximal intensity after painful stimulus by IM injection Yes (antagonistic) Unclear
Kirsch et al (1993) 38 100 healthy volunteers Oral information on the treatment administered: minimized or maximized situation Caffeine Level of alertness and stress, systolic and diastolic tension and cardiac rhythm Yes (synergistic) High
Penick et al (1965) 39 14 healthy volunteers Oral information on the treatment administered: minimized or maximized situations Epinephrine Level of perceived stress, glucose and free fatty acid concentration and cardiac rhythm Yes (synergistic) High
Van Der Molen et al (1988) 48 13 healthy volunteers Oral information provided on the treatment administered: minimized (relaxing information) and maximized (stressful information) situations Lactate Anxiety, pCO2 and respiratory rate Yes (synergistic) High
Rose et al (2001) 44 53 healthy volunteers Oral and written information on the treatment administered: minimized or maximized situations Melatonin 12‐question assessment sleeping scale Yes (antagonistic) High
Mitchell et al (1996) 30 40 healthy volunteers Oral information on the treatment administered: minimized or maximized situations d‐amphetamine Different scales of drug response (ARCI, DEQ, POMS) Yes (antagonistic) High
Hammami et al (2010) 28 180 healthy volunteers Oral information on the treatment administered: maximized or minimized situations Caffeine Subjective self‐assessed (energy, fatigue, nausea) and objective parameters (systolic blood pressure) Yes (antagonistic) High
Butcher et al (2012) 32 20 healthy volunteers Oral information on the treatment administered: minimized or maximized situations Ibuprofen Pain after painful electric stimulus No (no effect) Low
Flaten et al (2004) 35 94 healthy volunteers Oral information on the treatment administered: minimized, neutral or maximized situation Carisoprodol or caffeine Eyeblink reflex, self‐assessment of level of wakefulness and calm, skin conductance, cardiac rhythm, arterial tension No (no effect) Low
Alasken et al (2015) 10 142 healthy volunteers Oral information that analgesic or hyperalgesic cream was going to be administered: minimized or maximized situations EMLA cream Endpoints evaluated after painful stimulus, including pain, stress and blood pressure No (additive) Unclear
Atlas et al (2012) 37 14 healthy volunteers Oral information on the treatment administered: minimized or maximized situation Remifentanil Pain after painful thermal stimulus No (additive) Unclear
Ross et al (1962) 19 80 healthy volunteers Hidden administration of treatments to minimize their effect: minimized or neutral situations d‐amphetamine Mood swings (Clyde mood scale) and level of performance (tapping task and H‐bar test) No (no effect) High
Walach et al (2009) 75 healthy volunteers Oral information on the treatment administered Caffeine Objective parameters (SAT, DAT, CF, reaction time) and subjective parameters No (no effect) High
Bjorkedal et al (2011) 29 20 healthy volunteers Oral information that a powerful painkiller was administered (in fact, caffeine): minimized or maximized situations Caffeine Wakefulness, stress, pain, expectations and laser‐evoked potentials No (no effect) High
Flaten et al (1999) 34 66 healthy volunteers Oral information on the treatment administered: minimized, neutral or maximized situations Carisoprodol Eyeblink reflex, skin conductance, self‐assessment of level of stress and drowsiness No (no effect) High
Lyerly et al (1964) 49 90 veterans and 90 young employees Oral information provided on the treatment administered: minimized, neutral or maximized situations Amphetamine and chloral hydrate Mood swings (Clyde mood scale) and level of performance (tapping task and H‐bar test) No (no effect) High

Abbreviations: ARCI, addiction research center inventory; CF, cognitive function; DAT, divided attention task; DEQ, drug effect questionnaire; EMLA, eutectic mixture of local anaesthetics; FEV1, forced expiratory volume in 1 second; IM, intramuscular; pCO2, partial pressure of carbon dioxide; POMS, profile of mood states; SAT, spontaneous awakening trials; VAS, visual analogue scale.