1963–64 |
30 769 |
Prospective placebo‐controlled RCT of Shigella dysentery; follow‐up 109 days24
|
Phage preparation peroral once a week; therapy 109 days |
|
Effectiveness reported to be greater in infants aged 6–12 months and lowest in children aged 5–7 years
Original article in Russian, information drawn from review
|
1970 |
8 |
Case–control study of Vibrio cholerae; no follow‐up26
|
High dose of phage (1013 PFU), half‐hourly to hourly, until diarrhoea resolved; therapy 5–6 days |
|
|
2009 |
39 |
Prospective double‐blind RCT of chronic venous leg ulcers; no follow‐up27
|
Phage application via ultrasonic debridement device, followed by wound dressing and bandage; therapy 12 weeks |
|
|
2009 |
24 |
Prospective double‐blind RCT of chronic otitis externa; Pseudomonas aeruginosa; follow‐up 6 weeks28
|
105 PFU phage application plus meticulous ear cleaning; single application |
Significant improvement in symptoms and signs of otitis in phage‐treated group, and in erythema for phage v control at Day 7 (P = 0.02) and Day 21 (P = 0.014); ulceration, granulation and polyps at Day 7 (P = 0.017) and Day 42 (P = 0.025)
3/12 phage‐treated patients demonstrated near‐complete reduction in all visual analogue scores, along with undetectable P. aeruginosa, compared with none in the placebo group
|
Trial stopped early during interim analysis by primary investigator due to clinical improvement in the phage‐treated group
Phage replication in vivo was detected for a mean of 23.1 days (median, 21 days) in the treatment group
|
2016 |
120 |
Prospective double‐blind RCT of acute diarrhoea in children; follow‐up 21 days29
|
T4 phage cocktail or Microgen ColiProteus phage cocktail; therapy 4 days |
No difference in stool load or frequency between groups
Safety: no adverse events
No significant phage replication in stool (stool output < oral input). No difference in phage titres seen between stool with phage‐sensitive Escherichia coli compared with those without phage‐sensitive E. coli
|
Trial stopped early at interim analysis due to perceived lack of efficacy
Phage interventions targeted E. coli but only 60% of participants had confirmed pathogenic E. coli
Diarrhoeal illnesses were probably the result of complex polymicrobial interplay — potential explanation for a lack of efficacy of narrow spectrum phage treatment
|
2019 |
27 |
Prospective double‐blind RCT of clinically infected burn wounds (P. aeruginosa); follow‐up 14 days10
|
Alginate template soaked in PP1131 at ~ 1 × 106 PFU/mL, applied topically to wounds daily; therapy 7 days |
Time to sustained reduction in two‐quadrant bacterial burden was significantly longer in the phage group (median, 144 h [95% CI, 48–NR] v 47 h [95% CI, 23–122]; HR, 0.29 [95% CI, 0.10–0.79]; P = 0.018)
Higher proportion of participants had successful treatment outcome in the standard care group than in the phage group (13/17 [76%] v 9/17 [53%]; P = 0.15)
|
Study population heterogeneity: patients in the phage group were older whereas patients in the standard care group had more severe burns
The actual phage dose delivered to patients was substantially lower than anticipated
There were phage‐susceptibility differences in phage‐treated patients who had clinical success (89% susceptible) v those that failed (24% susceptible)
|