Skip to main content
. 2022 May 4;49(7):4780–4793. doi: 10.1002/mp.15683

TABLE 3.

Evaluation of applications 1–12

#Application description RI (all scenarios equally weighted) RI (RE1.5) Σ of D98%CTV, Σ [Gy] Σ of D2%CTV, Σ [Gy] Structure with greatest Σ for mean dose, Σ [Gy] Structure with greatest Σ for D 2%, Σ Gy]
1. IMRT setup (systematic) 0.8% 2.2% 1.3 0.5 Optic nerve r.: 8.8 Optic nerve r.: 15.1
2. IMRT setup (random) 9.6% 31.3% 0.1 0.1 Chiasma: 1.8 Eye_r.: 2.4
3. VMAT setup (systematic) 8.0% 12.5% 0.5 0.3 Optic nerve r.: 7.3 Optic nerve r.: 14.4
4. VMAT setup (random) 14.4% 49.5% 0.1 0.2 Chiasma: 2.2 Chiasma: 1.8
5. DTRT setup (systematic) 16.8% 23.2% 0.5 0.4 Optic nerve r.: 6.2 Chiasma: 14.5
6. DTRT setup (random) 5.6% 23.4% 0.1 0.1 Optic nerve r.: 0.8 Chiasma: 1.5
7. IMRT MLC/Jaws 21.0% 29.9% 1.7 1.7 PTV: 1.9 Lacrimal gland r.: 1.9
8. DTRT gantry, table, collimator 12.0% 33.5% 0.4 0.3 Lacrimal gland r.: 0.9 Optic nerve r.: 1.5
9. DYMBER electron setup 25.9% 31.2% 0.9 0.7 Lacrimal gland r.: 0.4 PTV: 0.7
10. VMAT rigid intrafraction motion 16.0% 43.2% 0.2 0.8 Chiasma: 0.6 Optic nerve r.: 1.2
11. VMAT, logfile 5.1% 15.3% 0.2 0.2 Chiasma: 1.6 Lacrimal gland l.: 3.5
12. VMAT, systematic and random patient and machine uncertainties 13.9% 16.9 0.1 0.2 Optic nerve r.: 1.6 Chiasma: 3.6

Note: Robustness index (RI) for all scenarios weighted equally and RE=1.5. Standard deviations for D98%CTV and D2%CTV and structure with greatest standard deviation in mean dose and D2%. The calculation of standard deviations is based on the default metric and RE=1.5.