Skip to main content
. 2022 May 26;235(4):1615–1628. doi: 10.1111/nph.18209

Table 2.

Differences among the three oak leaf flushes (Quercus robur) in the concentration of primary compounds (nitrogen and phosphorus) and secondary compounds (flavonoids, hydroxycinnamic acids, condensed tannins and hydrolysable tannins) during the early, mid and late season.

Response variable Predictor χ 2 df P
Nitrogen Leaf flush 2357.95 2 <0.001
Season 116.63 2 <0.001
Leaf flush × Season 136.21 3 <0.001
Phosphorus Leaf flush 560.56 2 <0.001
Season 897.40 2 <0.001
Leaf flush × Season 420.00 3 <0.001
Flavonoids Leaf flush 1851.89 2 <0.001
Season 1592.06 2 <0.001
Leaf flush × Season 834.17 3 <0.001
Hydroxycinnamic acids Leaf flush 444.37 2 <0.001
Season 521.06 2 <0.001
Leaf flush × Season 78.67 3 <0.001
Condensed tannins Leaf flush 2078.77 2 <0.001
Season 52.80 2 <0.001
Leaf flush × Season 509.83 3 <0.001
Hydrolysable tannins Leaf flush 2738.49 2 <0.001
Season 1037.14 2 <0.001
Leaf flush × Season 1205.87 3 <0.001

Shown are χ 2 values, degrees of freedom (df) and P‐values from linear mixed effect models, with significant P‐values (P < 0.05) in bold.