TABLE 2.
Study | Post‐donation outcomes | Risk perspective b | Findings |
---|---|---|---|
2010, Friedman | Perioperative complications | Descriptive Comparative: within donors |
Adjusted OR for all complications after nephrectomy, in Hispanic donors compared to White donors: 0.97 (95% CI 0.75–1.25) |
2010, Lentine a |
CKD CVD DM HTN |
Descriptive Comparative: within‐donor. Comparison of Hispanic versus White individuals, and general population using NHANES 2005–2006 |
Adjusted HR, at 5 yrs post‐donation, of:
Estimated prevalence of HTN among Hispanic living donors 5 yrs after nephrectomy, as compared to the general Hispanic population, according to subgroup: Female sex evaluated at age 40: 18.4 (95% CI 13.4–23.1) in Hispanic donors; 10.4 (95% CI 8.5–12.7) in Hispanic NHANES respondents Male sex, evaluated at age 40: 20.6 (95% CI 14.9–25.8) in Hispanic donors; 9.8 (95% CI 7.9–12.0) in Hispanic NHANES respondents Female sex evaluated at age 55: 40.2 (95% CI 30.5–48.6) in Hispanic donors; 21.6 (95% CI 18.1–25.6) in Hispanic NHANES respondents Male sex, evaluated at age 55: 44.2 (95% CI 33.3–53.3) in Hispanic donors; 20.5 (95% CI 16.9–24.5) in Hispanic NHANES respondents Estimated prevalence of DM among Hispanic living donors 5 yrs after nephrectomy, as compared to the general Hispanic population, according to subgroup: Female sex evaluated at age 40: 5.7 (95% CI 2.6–8.7) in Hispanic donors; 7.5 (95% CI 6.0–9.3) in Hispanic NHANES respondents Male sex, evaluated at age 40: 5.2 (95% CI 2.3–8.1) in Hispanic donors; 7.2 (95% CI 5.6–9.3) in Hispanic NHANES respondents Female sex evaluated at age 55: 10.8 (95% CI 4.8–16.4) in Hispanic donors; 14.5 (95% CI 11.8–17.7) in Hispanic NHANES respondents Male sex, evaluated at age 55: 9.9 (95% CI 4.2–15.4) in Hispanic donors; 14.5 (95% CI 11.8–17.7) in Hispanic NHANES respondents |
2010, Segev | Mortality | Descriptive Comparative, within‐donor |
|
2011, Lentine a |
DM HTN Accounting for relatedness |
Descriptive Comparative, within‐donor |
Adjusted HR, at 5 yrs post‐donation, of developing DM or HTN among Hispanic donors related to recipients compared to White donors similarly related to recipients:
|
2014, Lentine Am J Nephrol a |
HTN | Descriptive Comparative, within‐donor |
Adjusted HR, at 5 yrs post‐donation, likelihood of pharmacy fills for Hispanic compared to White donors:
|
2014, Lentine Transp. |
CKD DM HTN |
Descriptive Comparative, within‐donor |
Adjusted HR, at 5 yrs post‐donation, among Hispanic donors with Medicare compared to White donors with Medicare of developing:
|
2014, Muzaale | ESKD | Descriptive Comparative, within‐donor; Attributable: LKD versus healthy non‐donors |
Cumulative Incidence of ESKD at 15 yrs per 10 000, among Hispanic donors: 32.6 (95% CI 17.9–59.1), compared to White donors: 22.7 (95% CI 15.6–30.1) Cumulative Incidence of ESKD at 15 yrs for Hispanic donors: 32.6 per 10 000 (95% CI 17.9–59.1), compared to healthy Hispanic non‐donors: 6.7 per 10 000 (95% CI 0.00–15.0), for an absolute risk increase of ESKD at 15 yrs of 25.9 per 10 000 (p = .002) |
2014, Schold | Rehospitalization | Descriptive Comparative, within‐donor |
Cumulative Incidence of:
Adjusted HR in Hispanic donors compared to White donors:
|
2015, Lam a |
Gout | Descriptive Comparative within‐donor | Adjusted HR, at 7 yrs post‐donation, among Hispanic donors compared to White donors of developing gout (diagnostic billing claim or pharmacy fill), 0.60 (95% CI 0.19–1.9); gout diagnosis alone: 0.72 (95% CI not reported, p‐value >0.05); starting gout medication alone: 1.05 (CI not reported, p‐value >0.05) |
2015, Lentine a |
Proteinuria Nephrotic Syndrome Nephritis/ Nephropathy Renal Failure Any kidney diagnosis CKD Accounting for relatedness |
Descriptive Comparative, within‐donor |
Adjusted HR, at 7 yrs post‐donation, among Hispanic donors compared to White donors for:
Adjusted HR (including adjustment for donor‐recipient relationship), at 7 yrs post‐donation, for Hispanic donors compared to White donors for:
|
2016, Anjum |
ESKD, early (0–9 yrs) & late (10–25 yrs) post‐ donation: DM‐related HTN‐related GN‐ related |
Descriptive Comparative, within‐donor |
IRR of late post‐donation (10–25 yrs) ESKD compared with early post donation ESKD (0–9 yrs) in Hispanic donors compared to White donors:
|
2016, Lentine |
Perioperative Complications |
Descriptive Comparative, within donors |
|
2017, Massie | ESKD | Descriptive Comparative, within‐donor | Adjusted HR of ESKD within Hispanic donors compared to White donors 1.16 (95% CI 0.75–1.80; p = .5) |
2018, Wainright | ESKD | Descriptive Comparative, within‐donor |
|
2019, Holscher |
Early, w/in 2 yrs post‐donation: DM HTN |
Descriptive Comparative, within‐donor |
Adjusted IRR for risk among Hispanic versus non‐Hispanic donors:
|
2019, Lentine, |
Anti‐DM med use, Non‐insulin anti‐DM med use, Insulin use | Descriptive Comparative, within‐donor |
Adjusted HR, at 9 yrs post‐donation, among Hispanic donors compared to White donors of:
|
2020, Muzaale |
ESKD, stratified by biological relatedness | Descriptive Comparative, within Hispanic donor only |
|
2021, Augustine |
Change in eGFR, Proteinuria | Descriptive Comparative, within‐donor |
|
Abbreviations: ACEi, ace inhibitor; ADM, anti‐diabetic medication; Am J Nephrol, American Journal of Nephrology; ARB, angiotensin receptor blocker; BB, beta blocker; CCB, calcium channel blocker; CI, confidence interval; CKD, chronic kidney disease; CVD, cardiovascular disease; DM, diabetes mellitus; ESKD, end‐stage kidney disease; GN, glomerulonephritis; HR, hazard ratio; HTN, hypertension; NHANES, National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey; OR, odds ratio; Transp, Transplantation; yrs, years.
Same cohort (original study: Lentine et al., 2010).
Perspective of risk among Hispanic living kidney donors, as previously described in Lentine et al. 24