Table 2.
Evaluation scales by indicator
| Indicator | Evaluation scale | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Bad performance | Upgradeable performance | Medium performance | Good performance | |
| Average wage (AW) being lower than non‐poverty guideline (NPL) (No units) | <1.75 | 1.75–2.5 | 2.5–3.25 | >3.25 |
| Average wage (AW) being lower than minimum wage (MW) (no units) | <1.75 | 1.75–2.5 | 2.5–3.25 | >3.25 |
| Excessive working time (%) | >50 | 25–50 | 10–25 | <10 |
| Gender equality (%) | <10 | 10–20 | 20–33 | >33 |
| Fatal injuries (no.) | >10 | 5–10 | 1–5 | <1 |
| Non‐fatal injuries (no.) | >2000 | 500–2000 | 100–500 | <100 |
| Unemployment (%) | >1 | 0.5–1 | 0.1–0.5 | <0.1 |
| Labour laws (no.) | 0 | 1 | 2 | >2 |
| Profitability (%) | <100 | 100–105 | 105–110 | >110 |
| Net Margin (€000) | 0 | 0–5 | 5–10 | >10 |
| CAP coupled support (%) | >1 | 1–10 | 10–20 | >20 |
| Yield variability (%) | >13 | 11–13 | 8–11 | <8 |
| Price variability (%) | >32 | 25–32 | 19–25 | <19 |
| Protein security (kg ha−1) | <244 | 244–348 | 348–453 | >453 |
| Saturated fat content (g 100 g−1) | >1.9 | 1.5–1.9 | 1.1–1.5 | <1.1 |
| Fibre content (g 100−1) | <3.5 | 3.5–4.5 | 4.5–6 | >6 |
| Vitamin content (g 100−1) | <8 | 8–14 | 11–14 | >14 |
| Cholesterol content (g 100−1) | >39 | 31–39 | 23–31 | <23 |
| Protein content (g 100−1) | <5 | 5–9 | 9–13 | >13 |
| Protein affordability (€ kg−1) | >74 | 59–74 | 44–59 | <44 |