Skip to main content
. 2022 Sep 27;119(40):e2208034119. doi: 10.1073/pnas.2208034119

Fig. 2.

Fig. 2.

Energy landscape of Piezo vesicle shape. Stationary lipid membrane bending energy GM(RP;Rv) as a function of Piezo dome radius of curvature RP for (A) the Piezo vesicle radius Rv24.7 nm [vesicle 3 in figure 4 of our companion paper (10)] and (B) the Piezo vesicle radius Rv35.0 nm [vesicle 6 in figure 4 of our companion paper (10)] together with selected vesicle cross-sections. These correspond to RP=R1=7.6 nm, RP=RminM9.67 nm in A and RP=RminM10.1 nm in B, RP=R216.7 nm, and RP=R327.4 nm. In A, R2 is equal to the observed value of RP, R2=Robs, while R3=Robs in B. For each Piezo vesicle, we describe the Piezo dome geometry as a spherical cap with fixed cap area Acap. The in-plane Piezo dome radius rb and the Piezo dome contact angle α associated with the predicted free membrane shapes in figure 4 of our companion paper (10) determine, for each Piezo vesicle, Acap via Acap=2π rb21+cosα. (Scale bars, 5 nm.) (C) The table shows Robs vs. Rv for the seven Piezo vesicles in figure 4 of our companion paper (10). The corresponding spherical cap areas Acap are approximately 471, 414, 421, 471, 428, 444, and 442 nm2 (from top to bottom).