Table 5.
Name | Study | (n) | Associations/Timepoints in cGVHD (D0 = HCT date) | Framework steps completed | Potential clinical implementation | Ref |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Diagnostic Biomarkers | ||||||
sBAFF | Sarantopoulos 2007 | 104 | Increased levels in active cGVHD | Step 1: Discovery | • Improve diagnostic accuracy • Differentiate GVHD vs other complications |
39 |
Ahmed 2015 | 115 | Increased levels at 6 and 12 months | Step 1: Previous discovery | 41 | ||
Kariminia 2016 | 283 | Increased levels around time of diagnosis | Step 1: Previous discovery Step 2: 2 cohorts |
42 | ||
Rozmus 2019 | 107 | Increased levels around onset of symptoms | Step 1: Previous discovery | 43 | ||
CXCL9 | Kitko 2014 | 320 | Increased levels at diagnosis | Step 1: Discovery Step 2: 2 cohorts |
44 | |
Kariminia 2016 | 85 | Increased levels in 1 replication cohort | Step 1: Previous discovery Step 2: 2 cohorts |
42 | ||
Hakim 2016 | 95 | Increased levels and upregulation of gene expression | Step 1: Previous discovery | 45 | ||
CXCL10 | Ahmed 2015 | 115 | Increased levels at 6 and 12 months | Step 1: Hypothesis | 41 | |
Kariminia 2016 | 283 | Increased levels in both replication cohorts | Step 1: Previous discovery Step 2: 2 cohorts |
43 | ||
Hakim 2016 | 95 | Increased levels and upregulation of gene expression | Step 1: Hypothesis | 45 | ||
Biomarker panel: ST2, MMP3, CXCL9, OPN | Yu 2016 | 172 | Increased levels at diagnosis | Step 1: Discovery Step 2: 2 cohorts |
47 | |
MMP3 | Liu 2016 | 112 | Increased levels in BOS patients | Step 1: Discovery | 48 | |
DKK3 | Inamoto 2020 | 186 | Increased levels at diagnosis | Step 1: Discovery | 50 | |
Reg3α | DePriest 2021 | 289 | Increased levels associated with GI-cGVHD | Step 1: Previous discovery Step 2: 2 cohorts |
51 | |
Predictive Biomarkers | ||||||
No validated cGVHD predictive biomarker exists | • Intensify for high risk group • Reduce immunosuppression for low/standard risk group |
|||||
Response Biomarkers | ||||||
sBAFF | Whittle 2011 | 46 | Increased levels 1 month after ECP predicted response of cutaneous cGVHD | Step 1: Previous discovery | • Monitoring treatment response • Guide GVHD management • Future: Clinical efficacy endpoint |
58 |
ST2 | Dunavin 2018 | 16 | ST2 levels declined after 2-, 4- and 6-months of ECP | Step 1: Previous discovery | 57 | |
Prognostic Biomarkers | ||||||
CXCL9 | Giesen 2020 | 480 | Increased levels at symptom onset associated with severe cGVHD | Step 1: Previous discovery | • Anticipate course of disease • Adjust immunosuppression |
60 |
DKK3 | Inamoto 2020 | 186 | Increased levels at diagnosis associated with NRM | Step 1: Discovery | 50 | |
MMP-9 | Inamoto 2021 | 33 | Increased levels at BOS diagnosis associated with OS | Step 1: Discovery | 61 | |
Reg3α | DePriest 2021 | 289 | Increased levels at GI-cGVHD diagnosis associated with nrm | Step 1: Previous discovery Step 2: 2 cohorts |
51 | |
Risk Biomarkers | ||||||
Biomarker panel: ST2, MMP3, CXCL9, OPN | Yu 2016 | 172 | Levels D+100 associated with cGVHD development | Step 1: Discovery Step 2: 2 cohorts |
• Implement preemptive strategies | 47 |
CXCL9 | Abu Zaid 2017 | 211 | Increased levels D+100 or D+180 associated with cGVHD development | Step 1: Previous discovery Step 2: Clinical trial cohorts |
26 | |
Dai 2021 | 287 | Increased levels D+28 associated with severe cGVHD development | Step 1: Previous discovery | 64 | ||
CD163 | Inamoto 2017 | 167 | Increased levels D+80 associated with de-novo cGVHD | Step 1: Previous discovery | 66 |