Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2023 Aug 1.
Published in final edited form as: J Sports Sci. 2022 Jul 24;40(15):1732–1740. doi: 10.1080/02640414.2022.2103622

Table 5.

Classification accuracy metrics for identification of moderate intensity (≥ 3 METs) using candidate heuristic speed thresholds expressed in commonly used speed units

Sensitivity (%) Specificity (%) Accuracy (%) PPV (%) NPV (%) True positives
n (%)
True negatives
n (%)
False positives
n (%)
False negatives
n (%)

2.5 mph 91.4 45.2 79.8 83.3 63.6 170 (68.5%) 28 (11.3%) 34 (13.7%) 16 (6.5%)
3 mph 46.2 95.2 58.5 96.6 37.1 86 (34.7%) 59 (23.8%) 3 (1.2%) 100 (40.3%)

4.5 km/h 66.1 75.8 68.5 89.1 42.7 123 (49.6%) 47 (19.0%) 15 (6.0%) 63 (25.4%)
5 km/h 36.6 98.4 52.0 98.6 34.1 68 (27.4%) 61 (25.0%) 1 (0.4%) 118 (47.6%)

Note: The above values were calculated using the whole sample (i.e., not age specific). The optimal speed threshold for the whole sample is 1.28 m/s, and was converted into 2.87 mph or 4.61 km/h. We herein compared the classification metrics of two sets of candidate heuristic thresholds in different units for ease of interpretation. Abbreviations: METs, metabolic equivalents (1 MET = 3.5 mL/kg/min). NPV, negative predictive value; PPV, positive predictive value.