Table 5.
Sensitivity (%) | Specificity (%) | Accuracy (%) | PPV (%) | NPV (%) | True positives n (%) |
True negatives n (%) |
False positives n (%) |
False negatives n (%) |
|
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| |||||||||
2.5 mph | 91.4 | 45.2 | 79.8 | 83.3 | 63.6 | 170 (68.5%) | 28 (11.3%) | 34 (13.7%) | 16 (6.5%) |
3 mph | 46.2 | 95.2 | 58.5 | 96.6 | 37.1 | 86 (34.7%) | 59 (23.8%) | 3 (1.2%) | 100 (40.3%) |
| |||||||||
4.5 km/h | 66.1 | 75.8 | 68.5 | 89.1 | 42.7 | 123 (49.6%) | 47 (19.0%) | 15 (6.0%) | 63 (25.4%) |
5 km/h | 36.6 | 98.4 | 52.0 | 98.6 | 34.1 | 68 (27.4%) | 61 (25.0%) | 1 (0.4%) | 118 (47.6%) |
Note: The above values were calculated using the whole sample (i.e., not age specific). The optimal speed threshold for the whole sample is 1.28 m/s, and was converted into 2.87 mph or 4.61 km/h. We herein compared the classification metrics of two sets of candidate heuristic thresholds in different units for ease of interpretation. Abbreviations: METs, metabolic equivalents (1 MET = 3.5 mL/kg/min). NPV, negative predictive value; PPV, positive predictive value.