Skip to main content
. 2022 Jun 7;10(10):3475–3484. doi: 10.1002/fsn3.2949

TABLE 3.

Regression coefficient (β) and fit statistics of the predicted second‐order polynomial models for flavonoids and antioxidant activity

Factor Coefficient (β)
TFC DPPH OH
F value (model) 25.83 *** 9.84 *** 7.44 ***
F value (lack of fit) 1.19 2.64 2.19
Intercept 5.70 79.61 16.85
X 1 −0.73 *** −0.84 −10.44 ***
X 2 2.06 *** −1.91 ** 6.30 ***
X 3 0.61 *** −4.42 *** 2.09
X 4 0.46 ** 2.36 ** 0.27
X 1 X 2 −0.19 1.86 −2.66
X 1 X 3 0.30 5.44 *** −4.88
X 1 X 4 0.46 * −4.02 ** 5.99 *
X 2 X 3 1.14 *** −5.92 *** 1.17
X 2 X 4 0.47 1.34 −1.98
X 3 X 4 0.74 ** 1.09 4.56
X 1 2 −0.97 *** −1.83 −0.64
X 2 2 0.44 * 1.43 −1.92
X 3 2 0.22 −0.46 −2.79
X 4 2 −0.72 ** −0.16 6.71 **
R 2 .9627 .9078 .8816
Adj. R 2 .9255 .8155 .7631
p‐value (lack of fit) .4701 .1815 .2344
p‐value (model) <.0001 <.0001 .0003

Note: X 1: ethanol concentration (%); X 2: solvent‐to‐material ratio (ml/g); X 3: ultrasonic time (min); X 4: ultrasonic power (W).

Abbreviations: TFC, total flavonoids content; OH, hydroxyl radical scavenging ability by the salicylic acid method; DPPH, 2‐2‐dipheny‐1‐picrylhydrazyl radical scavenging capacity.

*

p < .05: indicates significant level.

**

p < .01: indicates highly significant level.

***

p < .001: indicates remarkably significant level.