Skip to main content
. 2022 Sep 26;12:920452. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2022.920452

Table 1.

General characteristics of included studies in the meta-analysis of DII and oral cancer risk.

Study Races/nationalities Study design Sample size(case/control) Mean/median age(case/control) Male/female(case/control) DII measurement (no. of DII components) E-DII Years of duration Study quality(NOS score)
Bao et al., 2020 (18) Chinese Matched case–control 295/425 57.80/59.22 185/295
110/130
159-item FFQ (22) Yes 8 6
Secchi et al., 2019 (19) Argentinean Matched case–control 27/86 Not reported 15/46
12/40
127-item FFQ (25) Yes 3 6
Mazul et al., 2018 (20) American Matched case–control 195/1,372 Not reported 966/945
302/427
72-item FFQ (27) Yes 4 7
Abe et al., 2018 (21) Japanese Matched case–control 255/762 60/60 826/2,466
202/615
47-item FFQ (22) No 4.8 6
Shivappa et al., 2017 (22) Italian Matched case–control 506/2,492 58/58 756/1,497
190/995
78-item FFQ (31) Yes 17 7

DII, dietary inflammatory index; FFQ, food frequency questionnaires; E-DII, energy adjusted DII; NOS, Newcastle–Ottawa Quality Assessment Scale.