Skip to main content
. 2022 Sep 26;13:936019. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.936019

Table 2.

Change in the ERP familiarity response (familiar-unfamiliar) from baseline to the 9-month follow-up as a function of treatment.

Placebo n = 9 Choline n = 10
M (SD) M (SD) t test
Nc Adaptive Mean Amplitude (μV)
Prefrontal −4.02 (9.07) 3.36 (10.56) p = 0.123
Right frontal −0.47 (3.25) −0.39 (5.97) p = 0.972
Left frontal −0.01 (7.06) 1.14 (5.43) p = 0.695
Central −3.17 (5.36) 2.06 (6.12) p = 0.065
Nc Latency Peak Amplitude (ms)
Prefrontal 53.06 (94.89) −44.08 (113.51) p = 0.061
Right frontal 8.46 (64.62) 3.18 (117.02) p = 0.906
Left frontal 44.04 (79.61) −29.45 (93.73) p = 0.085
Central 34.64 (85.44) −41.42 (98.68) p = 0.092
PSW (area under the curve)
Prefrontal −4.19 (8.77) 1.89 (13.89) p = 0.276
Right frontal 0.93 (3.03) 0.42 (5.68) p = 0.812
Left frontal 0.02 (6.12) 1.31 (4.58) p = 0.607
Central −2.36 (5.35) 2.60 (8.01) p = 0.135

These analyses include participants who had usable ERP data at both baseline and the 9-month follow-up (n = 19). Of the 24 participants with usable ERP data at follow-up, five had missing ERP data at baseline due to too few artifact-free trials.