Skip to main content
. 2022 Sep 26;13:936019. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.936019

Table 3.

Correlations between elicited imitation memory performance and ERP familiarity response (familiar-unfamiliar) at the end of the 9-month intervention (n = 24).

Recall of Individual Items Recall of Ordered Pairs
Nc Adaptive Mean Amplitude
Prefrontal −0.439* −0.373
Right frontal −0.417* −0.411*
Left frontal −0.140 0.001
Central −0.319 −0.339
Nc Latency to Peak Amplitude
Prefrontal 0.005 0.191
Right frontal 0.043 0.105
Left frontal −0.394 −0.371
Central −0.294 −0.299
PSW (area under the curve)
Prefrontal −0.625** −0.609**
Right frontal −0.032 −0.094
Left frontal −0.453* −0.134
Central −0.455* −0.290

Elicited imitation memory performance is standardized for age. Interpretation of a negative correlation means that better delayed recall is associated with a greater Nc amplitude for familiar stimuli (compared to unfamiliar), a shorter Nc latency to familiar stimuli (compared to unfamiliar), and a greater PSW response to unfamiliar stimuli (compared to familiar).

p < 0.10;

*

p < 0.05;

**

p < 0.01.