Skip to main content
. 2022 Oct 3;150:106156. doi: 10.1016/j.compbiomed.2022.106156

Table 7.

Comparison of our model with the state-of-the-art methods. Note that “PneumoniaV” and “PneumoniaB” denote the disease “Viral Pneumonia” and “Bacterial Pneumonia” respectively.

Ref Cases Classes Method Accuracy (%) XAI Params. (in Millions)
[20] TB = 4248
Normal = 453
2 Transfer learning with AlexNet and GoogLeNet 85.68 No AlexNet = 61
GoogleNet = 7

[33] Normal = 8851
Covid19 = 180
Pneumonia = 6054
3 Ensemble of Xception and ResNet50 91.40 No Xception Net = 22
ResNet = 11

[52] Normal = 310
PneumoniaB = 330
PneumoniaV = 327
COVID-19 = 284
4 CNN-based CoroNet 89.60 No CNN = 33.97

[30] Normal = 1583
COVID-19 = 576
Pneumonia = 4273
TB = 155
4 Custom CNN 94.53 No CNN = 34.73

[15] Normal = 310
PneumoniaB = 330
PneumoniaV = 327
COVID-19 = 284
4 Attention based VGG 85.43 No VGG-16 = 18
VGG-19 = 21.2

[32] Normal = 1341
COVID-19 = 864
Pneumonia = 1345
3 Inception V3 with Transfer learning 93.00 Yes Binary Class = 23.8
Multiclass = 23.8

[36] Normal = 439
COVID-19 = 435
PneumoniaB = 439
PneumoniaV = 439
TB = 434
5 Transfer learning with Resnet18 91.60 No Resnet18 = 11

Ours Normal = 1583
Covid19 = 576
Pneumonia = 4273
TB = 700
4 Custom CNN 95.94 Yes CNN = 3.7