Skip to main content
. 2022 Oct 10;2022(10):CD012717. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD012717.pub2

Comparison 3. Dynamic splinting versus static splinting.

Outcome or subgroup title No. of studies No. of participants Statistical method Effect size
3.1 Acetabular index: angle ≥ 28° (non RCTs) 1   Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI) Totals not selected
3.2 Acetabular index:angle (non‐RCTs) 2   Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI) Totals not selected
3.2.1 Less than 6 months 1   Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI) Totals not selected
3.2.2 2 years 1   Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI) Totals not selected
3.3 Need for operative intervention (non RCTs) 3   Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI) Totals not selected
3.3.1 Prospective cohort 1   Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI) Totals not selected
3.3.2 Retrospective study 2   Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI) Totals not selected