Table 5. Summary of observations on considerations for PSM credibility assessment in relation to V&V40 credibility factors and gradations.
Category | V&V40 Credibility factor | PSM-CT | PSM-VC |
---|---|---|---|
Verification | Software quality assurance | No unique PSM considerations identified. | |
Numerical code verification | |||
Discretization error | Gradations could account for number of patients these activities are performed on (see Table 6 & S1 Text, Section S2). | ||
Numerical solver Error | |||
Use error | For PSMs, with manual stages, there is a possibility of user variability related to subjectively chosen inputs. See S1 Text, Section S2 for example gradation accounting for this. | No unique PSM considerations identified. | |
Validation–model | Model form | No unique PSM considerations identified. | |
Model inputs–quantification of sensitivities | For PSMs, sensitivity analysis and uncertainty quantification are intimately linked, so an alternative approach is have a single sensitivity analysis and uncertainty quantification factor with possible subfactors: • Inputs analyzed • Rigor of input uncertainty characterization • Number of patients • Output quantities analyzed |
||
Model inputs–quantification of uncertainties | |||
Validation -comparator | Quantity of Test Samples | There may be unique PSM considerations, but these will be dependent on the specific validation activities performed. For some cases where a PSM is validated against clinical data, these factors could be interpreted as: • Number of validation subjects • Range of characteristics of validation subjects • Patient data • Patient measurements See S1 Text, Section S2 for example gradations. |
|
Range of Characteristics of Test Samples | |||
Characteristics of Test Samples | |||
Measurements of Test Samples | |||
Quantity of Test Conditions | There may be unique PSM considerations, but these will be dependent on the specific validation activities performed. | ||
Range of Test Conditions | |||
Measurements of Test Conditions | |||
Uncertainty of Test Condition Measurements | |||
Validation—comparison | Equivalency of Input Parameters | No unique PSM considerations identified. | |
Output Comparison–quantity | |||
Equivalency of Output Parameters | |||
Agreement of Output Comparison | |||
Rigor of Output Comparison | |||
Applicability | Relevance of the QOIs | ||
Relevance of the Validation Activities to the COU | For PSMs, assessing the relevance of the validation subjects to the full patient population / full virtual cohort is a component of applicability assessment |