Skip to main content
. 2022 Oct 6;15:1869–1886. doi: 10.2147/RMHP.S377304

Table 2.

Profile of Emergency Obstetric Referral Processes and Diagnoses

Characteristics Total, N=161
Number Percent
Referral escorted by health worker
 No 151 94
 Yes 10 6
Transport means for referral
 Private means (Taxi) 137 85
 Facility ambulance 24 15
Communication to higher facility before referral
 No 161 100
 Yes 0 0
Cadre in charge of referral (n=157)
 Doctor 6 4
 Midwives 151 96
Main reason for delay at referring facility (n=135)
 Waiting for transport means 36 27
 Waiting for referral letter 36 27
 Waiting for the doctor’s review/decision 30 22
 Many patients with few attending staff 22 16
 Others 11 8
Main reason for referral
 Power outages 79 49
 No doctor to operate on the patient 64 40
 Requiring specialized care 14 9
 Not indicated (Further management) 4 2
Main referral diagnosis
 Previous scar(s) 39 24
 Prolonged labour 33 21
 Malpresentations 17 11
 Obstructed labour 14 9
 PROM and Preterm labour 14 9
 Contracted pelvis 11 7
 Preeclampsia/eclampsia 9 6
 Others 12 8
 Not indicated 12  8

Notes: Others among referral diagnoses=antepartum hemorrhage n=5(3%), fetal distress n=3(2%), cardiac disease in pregnancy n=2(1%) and urinary tract infection n=2(1%).

Abbreviation: PROM, premature rupture of membranes.