Skip to main content
. 2022 Sep 4;36(10):e24683. doi: 10.1002/jcla.24683

TABLE 4.

Comparison of laboratory examination results and PDGF‐BB levels among control group, SAP group, and ACS group

Control group (n = 86) SAP group (n = 79) ACS group (n = 134) F/Z p
Glu (mmol/L) 5.50 ± 1.09 5.70 ± 1.53 5.69 ± 1.45 0.667 0.514
TC (mmol/L) 4.62 ± 1.13 4.50 ± 0.89 4.63 ± 1.29 0.360 0.698
TG (mmol/L) 1.58 ± 0.85 1.88 ± 1.34 1.85 ± 1.50 1.559 0.212
HDLc (mmol/L) 1.16 ± 0.33 1.01 ± 0.25Δ 1.06 ± 0.46 3.554 0.030*
LDLc (mmol/L) 2.88 ± 0.91 2.80 ± 0.81 2.92 ± 1.10 0.349 0.706
WBC (×109/L) 6.39 ± 1.49 6.49 ± 1.57 6.76 ± 1.50 1.938 0.146
Plt (×109/L) 234.25 ± 54.07 222.78 ± 55.04 231.48 ± 56.14 1.016 0.363
hsCRP (mg/L) 0.83 (0.44, 2.32) 1.02 (0.49, 2.42) 1.44 (0.75, 3.91)ab 10.653 0.005**
PDGF‐BB (pg/ml) 224.10 ± 111.83 231.00 ± 134.50 271.98 ± 129.62ab 5.262 0.006**

Note: The measurement data (Glu, TC, TG, HDLc, LDLc, WBC, Plt) were shown by mean ± SD, and those among control group, SAP group, and ACS group were analyzed by univariate ANOVA (*p < 0.05, **p < 0.01). The data of hsCRP level that did not match normal distribution were expressed as median and quartile M (P25, P75), that among three groups was analyzed by nonparametric Kruskal–Wallis univariate ANOVA test (*p < 0.05, **p < 0.01). The pairwise comparison was analyzed by q test (Δ compared with control group p < 0.05; Superscript letter a compared with control group, p < 0.01; Superscript letter b compared with SAP group, p < 0.01).

Abbreviations: ACS, acute coronary syndrome; CHD, coronary heart disease; Glu, Glucose; HDLc, high‐density lipoprotein cholesterol; hsCRP, high sensitivity C‐reactive protein; LDLc, low‐density lipoprotein cholesterol; PDGF‐BB, platelet‐derived growth factor‐BB; Plt, blood platelet; SAP, stable angina pectoria; TC, total cholesterol; TG, triglyceride; WBC, white blood cells.