Skip to main content
. 2022 Sep 27;13:979815. doi: 10.3389/fgene.2022.979815

TABLE 2.

The performance of MVIFMDA with all comparison methods.

Metrics ( mean±std ) MDHGI ABMDA NIMGSA NIMCGCN DANE-MDA MMGCN MVIFMDA
AUC 0.8678±0.0008 0.9205±0.0036 0.8854±0.0022 0.9038±0.0064 0.9224±0.0006 0.9230±0.0023 0.9396±0.0004
AUPR 0.0817±0.0012 0.1042±0.0154 0.1189±0.0089 0.1732±0.0174 0.2024±0.0030 0.2575±0.0008 0.2696±0.0009
accuracy 0.9894±0.0004 0.9851±0.0088 0.9908±0.0008 0.9928±0.0007 0.9933±0.0008 0.9934±0.0001 0.9936±0.0002
precision 0.1428±0.0101 0.0690±0.0448 0.1680±0.0232 0.2569±0.0292 0.1559±0.0819 0.3338±0.0081 0.3494±0.0118
recall 0.2200±0.0135 0.1416±0.0932 0.1891±0.0156 0.2146±0.0203 0.1683±0.0861 0.2986±0.0067 0.2982±0.0080
F1 0.1719±0.0109 0.0751±0.0452 0.1741±0.0161 0.2305±0.0202 0.1603±0.0826 0.3141±0.0007 0.3202±0.0006
precision@5% 0.0504±0.0003 0.0553±0.0028 0.0500±0.0008 0.0589±0.0016 0.0689±0.0002 0.0695±0.0001 0.0701±0.0002
precision@10% 0.0329±0.0001 0.0382±0.0009 0.0323±0.0004 0.0371±0.0007 0.0410±0.0001 0.0412±0.0001 0.0416±0.00003
recall @5% 0.5102±0.0027 0.5607±0.0279 0.5062±0.0078 0.5961±0.0165 0.6979±0.0018 0.7038±0.0010 0.7097±0.0018
recall @10% 0.6525±0.0027 0.7579±0.0171 0.6412±0.0088 0.7370±0.0136 0.8150±0.0018 0.8179±0.0016 0.8261±0.0006

The bold values indicate the best values in rows.