Table 3.
Fidelity to delivery of SFH intervention
| Level of implementation (%) | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Target barrier/driver, n (%) | Full | Partial – level 3 | Partial – level 2 | Partial – level 1 | Not implemented | No data a |
| Attitude, n = 12 | 9 (75.0) | 1 (8.3) | 0 (0.0) | 1 (8.3) | 1 (8.3) | 0 (0.0) |
| Self-efficacy, n = 6 | 4 (66.7) | 1 (16.7) | 1 (16.7) | 0 (0.0) | 0 (0.0) | 0 (0.0) |
| Coping planning, n = 6 | 4 (66.7) | 1 (16.7) | 1 (16.7) | 0 (0.0) | 0 (0.0) | 0 (0.0) |
| Social norms, n = 6 | 3 (50.0) | 0 (0.0) | 1 (16.7) | 0 (0.0) | 1 (16.7) | 1 (16.7) |
| Intention formation – action planning, n = 6 | 3 (50.0) | 3 (50.0) | 0 (0.0) | 0 (0.0) | 0 (0.0) | 0 (0.0) |
Delivery of each Ayah-message was scored 0–not implemented, 1–Ayah recited with no message, 2– Ayah recited with partial explanation of message, 3- Ayah recited with more than partial explanation but not full explanation of message, 4-fully implemented. Ayahs-messages linked to attitudes were scheduled for delivery in four weeks. The other four target barriers/drivers were scheduled for two weeks each
aNo assessment as this was scheduled during the Eid festival