Skip to main content
. 2022 Oct 11;22:1889. doi: 10.1186/s12889-022-14283-6

Table 3.

Fidelity to delivery of SFH intervention

Level of implementation (%)
Target barrier/driver, n (%) Full Partial – level 3 Partial – level 2 Partial – level 1 Not implemented No data a
Attitude, n = 12 9 (75.0) 1 (8.3) 0 (0.0) 1 (8.3) 1 (8.3) 0 (0.0)
Self-efficacy, n = 6 4 (66.7) 1 (16.7) 1 (16.7) 0 (0.0) 0 (0.0) 0 (0.0)
Coping planning, n = 6 4 (66.7) 1 (16.7) 1 (16.7) 0 (0.0) 0 (0.0) 0 (0.0)
Social norms, n = 6 3 (50.0) 0 (0.0) 1 (16.7) 0 (0.0) 1 (16.7) 1 (16.7)
Intention formation – action planning, n = 6 3 (50.0) 3 (50.0) 0 (0.0) 0 (0.0) 0 (0.0) 0 (0.0)

Delivery of each Ayah-message was scored 0–not implemented, 1–Ayah recited with no message, 2– Ayah recited with partial explanation of message, 3- Ayah recited with more than partial explanation but not full explanation of message, 4-fully implemented. Ayahs-messages linked to attitudes were scheduled for delivery in four weeks. The other four target barriers/drivers were scheduled for two weeks each

aNo assessment as this was scheduled during the Eid festival